AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!Of course she wants it now, before the Republicans are in the majority and might hand out some more serious punishment. She is a crook and should be in jail, not in Congress.
December 01 2010 at 12:58 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI'm guessing Mrs Waters wants the current senate to judge her before the New Senate takes office next session. She wont get the same kids gloves treatment from the new incoming group.
November 30 2010 at 8:54 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyTell her she needs to hide her faux paus better and pat her on the back, the voters in her distrct would elect her if she robbed a bank, might ever get her more votes. What a joke, the ethics committee will give her a pass
November 30 2010 at 5:38 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyNo Linda, Americans have done nothing. These people who are elected to represent Americans do it to themselves because they place themselves above the law, above their constitutients and think they can do no wrong. I don't trust government at all, period! I am ready for another election and ready to throw all the bums that are left out.
November 30 2010 at 2:49 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyLet Maxine Waters have her day in court and then expel both her and Rangel and send them packing!!! Forget "censure", that's a slap on the wrist!
November 30 2010 at 2:43 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down Replylet's not forget Maxine's role in the "everyone is entitled to own a home even if they are unable or unwilling to pay" subprime motgage fiasco!
November 30 2010 at 1:42 PM Report abuse Permalink +20 rate up rate down ReplyWhy wasn't Maxine demanding a trial back in August or September prior to the election? She has been accused for over a year and has stalled and stalled. The Democrats refused to hold the trials of her and Rangel prior to the election because they didn't want the publicity. Suddenly, now that a Republican majority might oversee her sentencing, she wants "due process" from the lame duck Congress that has been rejected by the people. Her violations are blatant with zero degrees of separation between her actions and her family's finances. Democrats attack Republicans for helping major U.S. industries and shriek when the obvious company gets an emergency contract for something that only it can provide (ie. contracts to Caterpillar and Halliburton), but the Democrats keep getting caught enriching themselves by forgetting to pay taxes, awarding THEMSELF a government grant, or taking outright bribes.
November 30 2010 at 1:33 PM Report abuse Permalink +20 rate up rate down ReplyIt seems like these politicians who commit a crime and found guilty and sent to prison still can receive a pension. What kind of cover up is our government producing. Something is wrong here. I for one have no trust in our government any more.
November 30 2010 at 1:27 PM Report abuse Permalink +25 rate up rate down ReplyLet's see: DeLay convicted. Rangel censured. Waters _______(to be determined). Seems Rangel and Waters should be tried in court and face same as DeLay who may end up in prison if his appeal fails.
November 30 2010 at 12:48 PM Report abuse Permalink +36 rate up rate down ReplyI think anyone who is convicted of wrong doing while serving the people should be denied any retirement, health benefits for life, and any other perks you get while serving the PEOPLE. It's time people of her ilk are made to pay for their wrong doings....if this is the case.
November 30 2010 at 12:45 PM Report abuse Permalink +37 rate up rate down ReplyDavid, what country do you live in? Here in America our law pronounces people innocent till proven guilty at a trial. I bet you hate living in a lawless country? Is it Russia, or Communist China or North Korea?
November 30 2010 at 1:07 PM Report abuse Permalink -29 rate up rate down Replywhat is wrong with you?? David said "if" and repeated it at the end of his statement..."if this is the case." How did you derive that he was convicting her without a trial?? read it again!!!
November 30 2010 at 1:31 PM Report abuse Permalink +24 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
66 Comments