Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Senate Votes to Keep Earmarks Alive -- With GOP Support

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The U.S. Senate voted 56 to 39 Tuesday to continue to allow congressional earmarking, the practice that lets individual lawmakers designate federal funds for specific projects, usually in their home states.

Although Senate Republicans recently adopted a nonbinding resolution to prevent GOP senators from requesting or supporting earmarks, the bill proposed Tuesday -- by two Democrats and two Republicans -- would have formally changed Senate rules to make it impossible for the chamber to move any bill with an earmark attached.

Despite the GOP caucus' official stand against the practice earlier this month, eight Republicans joined a majority of Democrats to keep earmarking alive, including Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski. She defended the practice on the campaign trail this year, arguing that the millions of earmarked dollars that her state gets help with everything from air-mail delivery for remote islands to basic infrastructure projects. Also voting yes were Republicans Susan Collins (Maine), Jim Inhofe (Okla.), Richard Shelby (Ala.), Richard Lugar (Ind.), Robert Bennett (Utah), George Voinovich (Ohio), and Thad Cochran (Miss.), the top Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Susan Collins, earmarksDemocrats were no more united than the GOP on the issue Tuesday. Although Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid defended congressional earmarks earlier this month as the constitutional obligation of every member of Congress, six Democrats bucked Reid and voted to end the practice, at least temporarily.

Russ Feingold (Wis.), Evan Bayh (Ind.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), and Mark Warner (Va.) joined Claire McCaskill (Mo.) and Mark Udall (Colo.) in voting against earmarks. McCaskill and Udall introduced the measure with GOP Sens. Tom Coburn (Okla.) and John McCain (Ariz.), two longtime critics of pork-barrel spending.

The issue has roiled both Democrats and Republicans this year as they balanced the chance to send federal funds back to their states and districts with the increasing anger of American voters, who have complained more and more that federal spending is out of control.

But critics say that even if Congress did ban earmarking, the larger question remains as to whether it would reduce overall federal spending or simply move decision-making about federal dollars from Congress to federal agencies.

Sen. Richard Durbin (Ill.), the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate and a member of the Appropriations Committee, argued before Tuesday's vote that senators are already making voluntary efforts to increase transparency in earmarking and that the effort is "virtually unprecedented."

He added that the real abuses in earmarking happened under Republican leadership in the House of Representatives, and that past abuses of the system should not affect his or anyone else's chance to send funding home to their states.

"I believe that I have an important responsibility to the state of Illinois and the people I represent to direct federal dollars into projects that are critically important to the direction of our state and its future," he said.
Filed Under: The Capitolist

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

50 Comments

Filter by:
ogltr13

LOL where is my TEA PARTY AT.

December 06 2010 at 3:46 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
toecheese44

ELECTION OVER,PROMISES FORGOTTEN,WELCOME THE NEXT 2 YRS SHOULD BE VERY INTERESTING

December 02 2010 at 2:50 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
neptus10

Our republic allows us as citzens to elect respectable candidates to the legistlature, for the sole purpose of voting the will of the people. This is a very wise, constitutional, legal, transparent process. Earmarking/ ie pork barrel spending is a process that attaches itself to a legal, earnest well debated peice of legislation that wont hold up to muster of debate as a stand alone bill, so it attaches itself to, and in so doing subverts the process that was so greatly and wisely devised by our founding fathers. It isnt debated and agreed upon, rather it is stealth and hasnt aired itself to be ruled on as the peoples will by the elected officials. Is there any question that the process subverts the constitutional safe guards of majority vote, as our founding fathers so wisely instituted? ans. NO. None at all. Is there any doubt the process is part of the larger problem we the people have,that being the 15 trillion dollar deficiet that we the people owe ??? Your responses are welcomed. Merry Christmas and a Happy NewYear to all. Signed Concerned American Citizen.

December 02 2010 at 2:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael

This is a nuanced topic. Earmarks, while widely abused, do have the useful effect of seeing to it that funds are directed as congress intends rather than at the whim of bureaucrats. Let's have a statesmanlike congress that directs spending to the essential and proper constitutionally authorized purposes that are legitimately in the public interest, and not just pork for poloitical gain.

December 01 2010 at 8:38 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
BIFF JONES

Its time the Senate started doing the people's business instead of providing sweet deals to their states in order to be re-elected. In the House you have two year terms, once they get elected most of their time is spent fundraising for the next election. I'm sure many come to Washington with good intentions, but are soon seduced by the power, corruption, and the self gratification that comes with it.

December 01 2010 at 6:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
trb2244

Hey folks... do you really expect politicians to change? The election is only step one; you have to keep paying attention, and you have to remember who betrayed your trust. Another election comes along in 2012. A lot of those senators will be running, both Dems and Republicans. They count on you to forget or to be distracted by an issue of the moment. Stay awake!

December 01 2010 at 2:09 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
enrico26xls

The time for the two-party system should be over! More parties and diverse opinions should be represented in our country. A democracy where two parties rule is not a true democracy. Both parties hold a monopoly on government! Vote more independents, more greens, more moderates!

December 01 2010 at 12:27 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to enrico26xls's comment
trb2244

This isn't a democracy. It's a Republic.

December 01 2010 at 1:56 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
cybrwalker

ABSOLUTELY enrico...The two parties need each other and live off the finger pointing; They blame each other and do nothing....for the American people, now corporations and rich people (basically synonymous) are a different matter. Take away the political money and you have an entirely new government.

December 02 2010 at 1:39 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
John Vilvens

The republicans that were voted in are not ther yet. So do not blame them yet. But look to see who voted for earmarks and vote them out next time. Makes no different if they are democrats or republicans. Every bill should be passed on it own merits. These who think it is alright to put earmaks on other bills because they cannot stand on thier own merit need voted out. Save are grand childrens money for them.

December 01 2010 at 8:51 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to John Vilvens's comment
Betty

I agree all that voted ear marks and any other favors needs to b e out next election .It took years for us to get to this point and its going to take years for them to realise we mean business .

December 01 2010 at 2:09 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
JOHNNY B

just cant beleive how stupid we are to think that the republicans would ever change , they lie and the country keeps falling for it , this trend is really starting to scare me , the only bright spot of the day is not one mention of palin how refreshing, and im sure no mention of her is driving her nuts

November 30 2010 at 10:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kenneth

They all talk about the defecate and cutting spending but they refuse to put a hold on earmarks and pork spending. These two items should be suspended until our budget is under control and our defecate is seriously reduced. Bringing home pork money does not make you a good representative.

November 30 2010 at 7:21 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Kenneth's comment
cybrwalker

When are people going to wake up. HELLO, HELLO, is anyone there? These politicians are concerned with ONLY two things. Money and getting re-elected. The first provides the second. The corporations, contract kick backs, rich donors--all from GUESS WHAT!!!! EARMARKS...money that gets "recirculated" back to the politicians. YOU THINK YOU,,YES YOU...misearable puny frickin voter is going to stop this money churn??? Goldman Sachs "employees" contributed over $1 million to Barack Obama's campaign (I belive that is the approximate figures) You wonder why Goldman Sachs former employee, head of the NY Federal Reserve is selling bonds to Goldman Sachs? Dudley dufus,,,criminal extraordinaire. The one simple thing that is nice is the super rich are easy to find.

December 02 2010 at 1:47 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners