Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Obama Calls Tax-Cuts Deal the 'Right Thing to Do'; Many Democrats Disagree

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
With the Dec. 31 deadline looming for the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts, President Barack Obama has confirmed that White House and congressional negotiators have agreed to a deal that would temporarily extend the current tax rates for all households, while also extending unemployment benefits for Americans who have been out of work for more than 26 weeks.

In remarks Monday night, Obama called the bipartisan agreement "the right thing to do" and detailed the framework of the deal, which would extend for two years the Bush tax cuts for all earners -- both those making above and below $250,000 annually, while also continuing current tax rates on dividends and capital gains, also for two years. In addition, the estate tax, which expired in 2009, would be temporarily set at 35 percent with a $5 million exemption, while extended unemployment benefits would continue for 13 months. Obama also said that negotiators had agreed to a one-year, 2-percent cut in the payroll tax for all workers.

The president stressed his displeasure with several aspects of the agreement, especially the extended tax cuts for the highest earners and the 35 percent rate for the estate tax. But he said that he did not want to risk the expiration of the middle-class tax cuts in the likely event of a lengthy impasse between Democrats and Republicans in Congress.

"It would be a grave injustice to let taxes go up for these people," President Obama said of middle-class workers.

Even as Obama spoke, senior Democratic aides stressed that members of the Democratic caucus could reject the proposal. A compromise on extending the tax cuts for the highest earners would represent a painful concession for the most liberal Democrats, who fought the tax cuts when they passed Congress in 2001 and 2003 and have fought to end them ever since. Democrats had also badly wanted to make permanent the tax cuts for middle- and lower-income workers.
Even President Obama made a rollback of the Bush tax cuts for wealthy Americans a cornerstone of his campaign for president in 2007 and 2008.
bush tax cutsAfter the deal was announced, a torrent of angry reaction from liberal Democrats in the House and Senate made it clear that the compromise would not get through Congress without a heated debate. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), one of the most liberal members of the Senate, threatened to filibuster the agreement in the upper chamber, calling it politics and bad policy.

"I think for a Democratic president, a Democratic House, and a Democratic Senate to be following the Bush economic philosophy of tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires is absolutely wrong public policy and absolutely wrong politically," Sanders said in an interview on MSNBC. "I've got to tell you, I will do whatever I can to see that 60 votes are not acquired to pass this piece of legislation."

On the House side, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) said that he, too, would do whatever he could to stop the compromise from passing in the lame duck session of Congress.

"This is a fight for the heart and soul of the Democratic Party and the nation," Conyers said after the president made his announcement. "I can tell you with certainty that legislative blackmail of this kind by the Republicans will be vehemently opposed by many if not most Democrats, progressives, and some Republicans who are concerned with the country's financial budget."

Although many Democrats are loath to join Obama in a compromise on the issue, they may have little choice if they want to keep the middle-class tax cuts alive. While Democrats in the House of Representatives were able to push through a permanent extension of the cuts for income below $250,000 last week, Senate Democrats failed on Saturday to find enough votes to move to a debate on the measure.

In a rare weekend session, senators voted 36-53 against moving to the House-passed bill, seven votes short of the 60 votes needed to break the filibuster. Four Democrats -- Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Jim Webb of Virginia, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin -- voted with the Republicans to block action on the bill, as did Sen. Joe Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut.

Later, by a 37-53 vote, the Senate also stopped consideration of "the millionaires' tax," a bill that would have extended the Bush tax cuts for every American family making less than $1 million per year, while returning income taxes for everyone else to 2001 levels. Democratic Sens. Richard Durbin of Illinois, Tom Harkin of Iowa, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia and Feingold, along with Lieberman, voted with the Republicans.

After the Saturday vote, congressional negotiators, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, went back to continue talks with top Republicans and the White House. After several more meetings and discussions, President Obama felt he had enough certainty to announce the framework for the the deal publicly.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are expected to present the final proposal to their members at caucus meetings on Tuesday, while House leaders will do the same on their side of Capitol Hill on Tuesday night. Once each side has gauged the support for a compromise from their members, votes in the House and Senate are expected later this week.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Comments

865 Comments

Filter by:
Comments are no longer accepted for this topic.
aonorat

I am an independent, retired senior citizen, and very distressed over the deal with the republicans. Unfortunately, our presdident sees fit to allow the Republicans to dictate fiscal policy at the expense of the nation. The provisons of the deal (extending the tax cuts, reducing payroll taxes and the extension of unemployment) add substantially to an already out of control deficit. Exactly, the wrong thing to do!!! My wife and I have a total retirement of $65,000; we do have some qualifying capital gains for the lower rates. However, we would be willing to forgo the extension of the tax breaks for the good of the country and to reduce the deficit. The republicans' main goal is to keep the tax break for multi-millionaires in which category many of them fall. Our Presdident seems to be going along he says to maintain the tax breaaks for the middle class but at a major increase in the deficit. The suggestion that the extension is only a two year extension is intellectually dishonest. We all know that in two years, the Republicans will find a way to permanently extend the tax breaks. regretfully, my support for President Obama is at an end. I want to make clear, I am not a liberal by any stretch. Considering the politicians now in power, I say God help our nation and our children. For short-term political gains our president and the republicans are sacrificing the future of our nation and our children. I can only hope that those democrats and republicans with the interest of the nation in mind find a way to kill this crazy deal.

December 07 2010 at 12:10 PM
jeanbaker0

I want fairness p that's all I want. All these "agreements" and deals always benefit some more than others. That's what really ticks me off. We should all pay the same rate. It's fair.

December 07 2010 at 12:09 PM
Archaeoone

If they are so desperate for work, why are so many of the unemployment offices and employment agencies supplying data that confirms that people are not taking jobs until they are at the end of their unemployment check cycle and then magically, finding positions?

December 07 2010 at 12:08 PM
Ron

Tax cuts help pay the mortgage brother!

December 07 2010 at 12:01 PM
clarissa49

Both Democrats and Republican share the blame. I support keeping tax cuts for below 250K. I did not compeltely understand everything that was discussed regarding small business and taxes;I am for encouraging small business. I am also for taxing the really rich. People don't have to make millions and billions to have a comfortable living standard. The problem is greed!!!!! I live in an area where jobs are not to be had unless you know someone who CAN hire you. I am disqualified for unemployment benefits because I have an injury; one has to be physically able to accept a fulltime job offer. I tried to get into a retraining problem. I have two college degrees already. My efforts were a failure; people I contacted were ignorant of a state retraining initiative, etc. My husband has three college degrees and works partime jobs. He has been doing this for ten years+/-.So some of you should not assume what you think is the answer is feasible.

December 07 2010 at 11:52 AM
carl

what about the other 300 million americans that are getting screwed Think before you vote next time

December 07 2010 at 11:36 AM
barbinne

This will be where the rubber meets the road as far as the tea party is concerned. According to them they sent repubs to DC to bring spending and the deficit under control. Well about 700 billion was just added to it with the blessings of the republicans. This is democracy in action, folks! From now on we need to work together to get things done. Too long it has been republicans v. democrats in gridlock while Rome burns and rest of the world passes us by.

December 07 2010 at 11:34 AM -1
1 reply to barbinne's comment
bthered

The TEA Party was never anything but another way of saying Republican Party.

December 07 2010 at 11:57 AM -1
bigideaadpr

So essentially what the government is going to do is keep spending, keep printing money, keep government entitlements going and keep those people who actually pay income taxes from getting even more aggrevated. Wow! What a bold new approach to leadership.

December 07 2010 at 11:24 AM +11
Don

Its for reasons like this that I plan to retire outside of this country with in the next 5 to 8 years. I think that most if not all of these problems are a result of the USA being in recline. If we are still a world leading country, and I'm not too sure we still are, we won't be within the next 10 to 15 years. Through out history, no empire has ever lasted much more than 200 years. We as a nation have had our run. Evidence of this is all around us. Just one example is the disappearing middle class. In third world countries, typically about 90% of the population are poor, about 8% are middle class, and about 2% are wealthy. We'll be there before you know it. I think the beginning of the eny started sometime inbetween the events of 9/11/01 and the governments condoning of torture of POWs. With a Republican party that is only for big business and nothing else, and a Democratic party that has no backbone, I don't see a change in course anytime within our lifetimes.

December 07 2010 at 11:21 AM -4
Archaeoone

It has been pointed out that many of those who are now getting years of unemployment could use that time to further their educations, increasing the likelihood of qualifying for a job. There are a multitude of educational opportunities out there - colleges and universitites, technical schools, training programs, etc. What is apparent to me is that few are taking advantage of these resources, and are just content to sit with their hands out, quite happy to have a free ride on the taxpayers' backs. If necessary, one takes a lower paying job, perhaps even more than one, and then looks to improve and advance, either through education and/or industriousness. I see many lower paying jobs going wanting because many find it easier to just collect unemployment checks and vociferously complain about the many injustices they have had to endure.

December 07 2010 at 11:21 AM +2
2 replies to Archaeoone's comment
hersk21

Your entire take on the situation is absurd. You're so worried of people taking advantage. Don't be. Such people are few and far between. Most of the unemployed are desperate for work.

December 07 2010 at 11:37 AM -3
rwebb44232

Sure thing, archaeoone. People with no income except for their meager unemployment check should suck it up and spend thousands of dollars on all the educational opportunities out there. Oops, forgot, the republicans have been dismantling our educational system since Reagan was in office.

December 07 2010 at 12:05 PM

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners