AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
The Defense Authorization bill was delayed for another reason -- a request from Sen, Susan Collins to hold off on a final vote on the Defense bill until the Senate has voted on the tax cut compromise. Reid negotiated throughout the day with Collins, since her support is considered crucial to passing the bill. "I reminded the majority leader, as has Sen. Lieberman, that everyone on the Republican side wants to see the tax package completed first," Collins said Wednesday night,Let's crash the whole system down for a microscopic group. It's not enough that they could join the military in the past. BUT NOW they want to announce to the world we are here we are IN YOUR FACE and we are Gay SOLDIERS. SOLUTION: Set up homosexual military units. He would be VOLUNTARILY joining such a unit. This seems reasonable. The subversives behind this PUSH won't be happy with that because the REAL AIM BEHIND THIS is to DISTORT DISTRACT DESTROY and DECONSTRUCT and DEMORALIZE the whole country not just the military. They will keep the argument going forever. THE TRICKLE DOWN NWO VERMIN are pushing these policies. The above idea let's people keep their individuality without forcing their unwanted values on the rest of the majority. If they change the system the way they intend our enemies won't have to fire a shot or have a D-Day type invasion. Just wait in the wings of the white house and watch it crash down. This is how it is when the minority rules over the majority.
December 10 2010 at 8:42 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyKeep the country as strong as possible keep gay homosexuals out of the military. I have known many of them; they are not normal. Their behavior is not normal. Their views and thinking are not normal. I don't doubt that many of them have served well honorably. But them getting killed or maimed because they joined the army does NOT earn them some normalcy medal. If they are so proud of being homosexual and want to march in parades and make OPEN declaration, then a GAY unit where they can serve openly and proudly should be considered in earnest. If what they want is to serve there should be little or no debate. Their subversive sponsors won't settle for this because the REAL AIM is to DISTRACT, DISRUPT and DETERIORATE the quality and EFFECTIVENESS of the US military.
December 10 2010 at 12:31 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyEverything you said is is just an opinion I hope you know that. The same arguments were used when blacks wanted to be integrated in the military.
December 10 2010 at 3:08 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyThis is just political theatrics. Reid knows he doesn't have the votes to pass this. This is just for the benefit of his constituents...
December 09 2010 at 9:13 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplySir/Madame - I would like to offer my opinion on the controversy surrounding the so called "Don't ask, don't tell" legislation now causing so much differing opinion amongst our duly elected representatives in Washington. The armed forces of the world for centuries has practice separation (not segregation) between sexes and for what was considered a very good reason. Fear of rampant or even partially rampant sexual promiscuity among male and female troops was strongly discourage to prevent the spread of veneral and other sexually transmitted diseases. This is no imaginative concept, but has surfaced time and time again and even crippled nations armies in the past. Since homosexuality is known to takeplace carelessly between both sexes, and spread of sexually transmitted diseases is also known to increase under these circumstances, it is common sense to restrict those who would be prone to practice unsafe sex while serving in our armed forces. The don't ask don't tell policy allows for non-discrimination against all those serving. Contrary to what opponents say, it allows for anyone to serve as long as they don't try to impress anyone, or call attention to their sexual preferences. And except for possibly these individuals, does anyone really want to know what they are?
December 09 2010 at 1:38 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyThe self-implosion of the Dem party continues. And at this rate it will continue through 2012 because it seems Dems are already becoming exactly what they accuse the GOP of being - the obstructionist party of no.
December 08 2010 at 11:53 PM Report abuse Permalink +9 rate up rate down ReplyDid you ever hear of standing on "principles"? Even though some good republicans were willing to help Obama the past two years, their "leadership" said no on principle--same with liberal Dems.: they honestly believe the pres. is selling out to the G.O.P.
December 10 2010 at 12:37 AM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyReid did the right thing on this bill by delaying it. The tax bill, unemployment, and the budget should take priority.
December 08 2010 at 11:27 PM Report abuse Permalink +13 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
11 Comments