Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Elizabeth Edwards' Harshest Critics: Are They Sorry Now?

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
On the day Elizabeth Edwards died, Time magazine's Mark Halperin eulogized her on "Hardball with Chris Matthews" as "one of the most public and valiant cancer survivors" he had ever known, an advocate who had used her spotlight to champion issues dear to her, including health care and gay rights. Movingly, Halperin described Edwards as an "incredible testament" to strength and courage and a mother who had worked to keep her family's life as normal as possible during the last days of her illness.

In fact, unless you were one of the millions who read "Game Change," the '08 presidential campaign book Halperin co-authored with John Heilemann, you'd never have guessed that this was the same guy whose lightly attributed, literally bodice-ripping account of Elizabeth Edwards portrayed her, in unbelievably lurid detail, as a scheming and unstable she-devil. The illustrations that accompanied a New York Magazine excerpt of the chapter about the Edwardses only added to the portrait of a political wife gone mad.

As she neared death, Elizabeth was surrounded by and in contact with many former Edwards aides who have spoken of her all along as a friend and mother figure. But in the broad-brush portrayal of her in the "Game Change" excerpt published in New York Magazine, the authors painted John Edwards' staff as weary of "the lie of Saint Elizabeth:"
"No one in the Edwardses' political circle felt anything less than complete sympathy for Elizabeth's plight. And yet the romance between her and the electorate struck them as ironic nonetheless -- because their own relationships with her were so unpleasant that they felt like battered spouses. The nearly universal assessment among them was that there was no one on the national stage for whom the disparity between public image and private reality was vaster or more disturbing."

"During the 2004 race, Elizabeth badgered and berated John's advisers around the clock. She called Nick Baldick, his campaign manager, an idiot. ... She would stay up late scouring the Web, pulling down negative stories ... about her husband, forwarding them with vicious messages to the communications team. She routinely unleashed profanity-laced tirades on conference calls."
Halperin and Heilemann also described in excruciating detail an extremely personal marital fight between John and Elizabeth, describing her as "out of control" and "incoherent" who yelled at an aide when stories of John's affair became public, 'You stay away from our family! You are poison! You're dead to us!' "

There was no shortage of criticism of Edwards in the media, of course, and some of it was deserved. Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker called Elizabeth a hypocrite, suggesting that she had essentially committed fraud against the American voters when her husband ran for president. And Sally Quinn, in her Washington Post column On Faith, called Elizabeth out for enabling what she called John's "immoral behavior" and for not being responsible enough to keep her husband out of the 2008 presidential race after learning of his affair, blaming her for the decision:
"The problem is SHE LET HIM DO IT [emphasis in original]. ... Not only did she allow him to run, exposing herself and her children to the pain and humiliation that that would inevitably come, she could have allowed him to destroy the Democratic party in the process. ... She stood by him and let him lie and lie and lie."
But even the hit job by the authors of "Game Change" was a drive-by compared to the looooong campaign waged by Mickey Kaus, then at Slate, who day after day (after day after day) wrote blog posts with such titles as "Elizabeth Edwards' Chutzpah," "How Big a Victim Is Elizabeth?" and "St. Elizabeth, Mythmaker," all asking whether Elizabeth was wearing a cloak of victimhood for her own political benefit.

"Even when by all rights she should be reassuming her position as a highly sympathetic figure,'' he wrote, "Edwards finds a way to be annoying" because she was tired of the media poking into her personal life. In another Slate article, he continued his portrayal of Eizabeth as a faux victim, writing:
"Elizabeth Edwards has a bushelful of chutzpah chastising the mainstream campaign press for its shallow news coverage after the mainstream campaign press cut her and her husband a huge break on one of the great shallow stories of 2008 -- the Mysterious Edwards Love Child."
And now? Speaking of denial, did her harshest and most committed critics think this day would never come? Halperin and Quinn declined to comment, Heilemann didn't respond to a request for comment, and Parker took quite a different tone on CNN this week, saying it was completely understandable to her "as a woman" that Elizabeth encouraged her husband to stay in the race even after her cancer had returned because she wanted to "see her family in place and be able to leave with a peaceful heart."

Kaus, however, said he has no second thoughts at all; every one of those pieces was completely fair, he said in an e-mail, in light of her status as a public figure, and especially because he felt both John and Elizabeth Edwards had put the Democratic Party at risk in the 2008 presidential election with their "recklessness."

Anyway, said Kaus, who recently went to work for Newsweek, this isn't the appropriate time to assess his past coverage. But if not now, when?

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

40 Comments

Filter by:
patty

Elizabeth Edwards,was a brave, couragous, woman. I don't care what she did wrong,
she went through a lot suffering with Cancer, and the way her husband treated her.
I had the high hopes, of John Edwards, becoming President, because he was or is
a smart man. But since he treated his FAMILY, as he did, he is no where close to being the person I thought he was. He disappointed a lot of people.
Elizabeth Edwards, did the right thing for her Kids. Those children have lost their Mother, forever, while John Edwards, can live on and continue, the hurtful things he does. He treated her so dirty. He don't even deserve to raise those children.
Elizabeth Edwards, you will always remain, a Beautiful lady in my eyes and you was a one-of kind Mother to your children. I will always remember you.
Rest in the arms of Jesus.

January 06 2011 at 7:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
fridleygal

Have you seen someone who has cancer?Oh,I don't mean on tv, or sitting next to you. Have you seen a woman whose breasts have been removed? Have you watched someone vomit in the kitchen sink because they couldn't walk a step further? Have you watched the tears, the anger, the pain? I watched my sister do all of the above. Elizabeth deserves our respect for the fight she fought, for the Mother she was, for the friend and the sister she was. The rest of you political hacks make me ill. Leave her family in peace, leave her name alone and most of all walk a mile in her shoes before you make one more asnine comment!

December 11 2010 at 8:21 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
mlrrbs

I think that Elizabeth Edwaeds was a wonderful person. She continued to support in the political arena a husband that did not deserve her supoort. At a time when a Elizabeth Edwards needed her husband the most he humuliated her in the worse possible way by continuing his relation with his mistress and having a child with her. So, for John Edwards, I will say that if it barks like a dog, wags it tail like a dog, then it must be a dog. For Elizabeth Edwards children, my wish for them is that they know thier mother faced life challenges with dignity and grace. Rest in Peace Elizabeth Edwards.

December 11 2010 at 7:08 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
rent30458

As is true with most strong personalities, both sides of Elizabeth Edwards that have been portrayed are probably true. Human beings tend to have multi-personalities. I imagine she was aware of it too.

December 11 2010 at 6:25 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
lorebayz

Whatever happened to "walk a mile in my shoes"? Unbelievable.

December 11 2010 at 5:55 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
connie997

I actually had written a blog when Edwards was promoting her book on Oprah, with some of the same criticisms. I took it down for one day when I realized she was dying. After I saw the first eulogy, I put it back up, along with an explanation. Why did I write it if it was not relevant? I found her blame of the "other woman" over her husband ridiculous, her excuse for living in a 28,000 sq. ft. house laughable and her involvement in a $57 million dollar fraud against her husband's campaign supporters to be criminal. That did not change just because she was dead. However, I do feel great sympathy for the children she left behind who are grieving today for their mother.

December 11 2010 at 12:05 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Patricia

It is always very sad when a family member or friend dies of cancer, however since Elizabeth admitted she didn't get Mammograms and an egg size lump was discovered in her breast she obviously didn't even go for papsmears. She could have done a great deal for women in promoting the annual mammograms and the consequenses of not doing so. This seems to be ignored.

December 11 2010 at 11:57 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Patricia's comment
mobilfam

It's up to you to take care of you.

December 11 2010 at 6:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
aangerome4

You know all this because you knew her personally and she told you, right? For you to make such a statement is unbelievable. You have no idea if that woman was misdiagnosed or if she had an aggressive type of cancer. My mother went for annual colonoscopies and less than a year after having one, was diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer and lost her life to it 18 months later. Speak about things you know, don't speculate. Especially about something so horrible.

December 11 2010 at 8:53 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Paula

Dealing with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer is incredibly difficult, as is making decisons about treatment, and trying to keep yourself together emotionally. Doing all of this in the public view makes it harder. This woman needed her husband for support yet found he was having an affair. Give her a break, she had more than her share to deal with and did the best she could.

December 11 2010 at 11:21 AM Report abuse +15 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Paula's comment
luapmi2

Amen

December 11 2010 at 3:29 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Avice

Dealing with a very small, noninvasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer is incredibly difficult. While I was very lucky physically, it was very hard emotionally. I had quit my job to begin an MBA program (at age 48) and found a lump one week later, which made me feel like God was slapping me down for doing such a foolish thing. If it weren't for COBRA, I would have never had the care I received. I used to look at clothing, think it was too expensive, and then think, "they can bury me in it." I didn't have the support I needed because everybody thought I was tough and could/would take care of myself. If you haven't suddenly been forced to confront your mortality in this way, you have no right to comment on Elizabeth Edward's state of mind or actions.

December 11 2010 at 11:31 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
stevenmkingusaf

No one's happy about Ms Edwards' tragic death, but what we're seeing here is a magnitude above the usual post-mortem hoopla over a celebrity's passing. I'm certain beyond doubt that she was a wonderful mother, friend and scholar, but the unfortunate truth is that Elizabeth Edwards public persona deserves little more than an astericks in America's rogues gallery of political scandals.

December 11 2010 at 11:17 AM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
Nconstinc

Though as deeply sorry I am about her fight and loss to cancer, that doe not make me sorry for not agreeing wiht her views! Thats a cheap shot! Shes human and it a tragic loss, but we all have diffrences and opinions and I won;t be made to feel quilty for that! As a person she was fantastic, with views that were diffrent than mine. God bless her and I am sorry she is gone.

December 11 2010 at 11:16 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners