Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Government Sues BP, Others Over Gulf Oil Spill

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The Obama administration filed a civil lawsuit Wednesday against BP and eight other companies, seeking money for fines and clean-up costs in April's disastrous Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

The complaint, filed in federal court in New Orleans, accuses the firms of a number of regulatory violations in the April 20 explosion and fire on the Deepwater Horizon rig, The Los Angeles Times reported.

"We intend to prove that these defendants are responsible for government removal costs, economic losses and environmental damages without limitation,'' said Atty. Gen. Eric Holder.

The government's claim seeks penalties and damages under the Clean Water act and the Oil Pollution Act.

No pricetag has been put on the amount of damage caused by the spill because assessments are still ongoing. The suit is sure to ask for billions of dollars.

The Wall Street Journal
said the other defendants are subsidiaries of Transocean Ltd., which owned and operated the Deepwater Horizon; Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and MOEX Offshore 2007, which had financial stakes in the well; and the insurance conglomerate QBE Underwriting Ltd./Lloyd's Syndicate.

The April 20 explosion killed 11 workers at BP's Macondo well and caused oil to spew from the ocean floor for months.

In October a presidential commission's reports criticized the Obama administration's response to the oil spill.
Filed Under: Environment

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

10 Comments

Filter by:
rickard0508

I knew it....I read the headline and I just couldn't wait to see how many of you would rush to BP's defense. If this lawsuit ruins BP, then so be it. Let it be a lesson on cutting corners to rake in more profit. It will be interesting to see if BP will then go after Halliburton. As far as those British investors are concerned......sorry about your tough luck.

December 15 2010 at 9:54 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
hshomeofbargains

I'll bet next time if we have any accident, no business will voluntarily put up billions ahead of time. Why should they? BP gave billions already to take care of this, and there is still money left in that pot. But now Obama sues for billions more? It's almost double jeopardy. Why even consider helping to start with if you know you'll get sued later anyway. Someone needs to tell Obama that he spent trillions and these billions he's now suing for won't even cover the interest on the money he's blown thru in 2 years.

December 15 2010 at 8:20 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to hshomeofbargains's comment
lillyluminatus

I'll bet next time, companies will think twice about blatantly cutting corners in basic safety in pursuit of an ever-larger profit margin. Which, by the way, is the ENTIRE point of our "market-based" regulatory regime--instead of making these actions outright illegal (as in most countries), we are supposed to have made them cost-prohibitive. If neglecting basic industry standards isn't criminal, and it isn't cost-prohibitive, what on earth will deter such behavior?

December 15 2010 at 9:21 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
Annalisa

BP gave billions? Am I missing something here? Wasn't it thier neglect and them cutting corners that created the catastrophy in the first place? How is it then that they have "given" anything? If someone destroys something are they not supposed to be held financially responsible? Attacking the president is really backwards on this one. BP is not footing the whole bill for this clean up and they certainly are not compensating those who make thier living in this region due to the fishing or tourist industries. The economy in that area has taken a devastating blow as a result of BP's actions and negligence. How do you figure they were helping? Since when do you destroy an economy and then "help" fix it. NO! "You" destroyed it, "you" fix it! Or you get sued! Either way you're going to fix it and that is as it should be!
Just My Humble Opinion,
JAZZEE

December 16 2010 at 12:10 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
David Doerr

Let us not be displeased with the President, who didn't screw up his duties. Rather, let's point the finger at those who failed to live up to the standards of business for which they are most exceedingly highly paid. It's like turning the responsibility for the Catholic Church's huge child sex scandal away from the "overseers" (as bishops were once known) and then seeing to it that now of the Church's hierarchy are considered to be liable for failure to act in due course of their obligations. People tolerate a considerable amount of evil. Fix it. Hold those responsible who made the mistakes - not the victims.

December 15 2010 at 7:51 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
totalep

If BP had know this was going to come down on them I wonder if they would have been so willing to put up all the money they already put up to clean up the mess and make good on many claims of those whose buisness was hurt by the spill.

December 15 2010 at 7:12 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
sfields435

Matt: "harrassment"? You're joking ,right? Just because the gov't has "already gotten billions from BP" doesn't mean that BP has COVERED the costs of all damages it inflicted upon American taxpayers. Are you suggesting that American TAXPAYERS should be forced to pick up the tab for ANY PORTION of BP's unconscionable negligence??

December 15 2010 at 7:03 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
joe

The government's actions could ruin BP financially. It is a well known fact that British retirement funds are heavily invested in BP and if Obama's actions against BP causes damage to those retirement funds the Brits are going to be very very displeased with Obama.

December 15 2010 at 6:35 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to joe's comment
mac102751

Well joe I guess that means you and I and our kids will have to pay for the cleanup.

December 15 2010 at 6:53 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
jbanderson4249

Mac, BP has already said they will pay for the clean up. They have already set aside funds, this is a power and money grab from the Obama group.

December 15 2010 at 7:40 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
Matt

The government has already gotten billions from BP. I do not understand the point of further harassment. I have seen this time and again, the government sues after some disaster and it just denies benefits from the families because it shrinks the pot.

December 15 2010 at 6:12 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Matt's comment
tenderlies1

The biggest mistake they made was trying to cheap out, if it was a realtive of yours that dies that day whats their life worth to you. Second mistake was the laxed regulations and procedures they did this well under thanks to the Bush period with a big helping hand from Chenney. People all got mad because Obama stopped the drilling but to allow this to go on with a high risk of this happening over and over again will hurt this Country in a lot of worse ways than higher pricies on fuel and even if you had the crude we don't have enough refinieries and they don't won't more because they use that to jump the price up and down all the time and we all know they have made record profitsfor several years now at the cost of driving our economy out the roof from the increase of all the products we ship which is pretty much everything we buy

December 15 2010 at 7:58 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
lillyluminatus

Actually, the government hasn't gotten anything from BP; the individuals and businesses affected have. This isn't harassment, it is defense of the law. Why does that become harassing when the criminals involved are corporations?

December 15 2010 at 9:08 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>