AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
As a result, the House Rules Committee agreed Wednesday night that the House will take up an amendment to modify the estate-tax piece of the package before the chamber votes on final passage of the overall tax-cut compromise Thursday afternoon.There should have never been an estate tax. You work so hard during your life to make a better life for your family and gain assets along the way that will gain in value for the purpose to leave to your children. Why should they have to be taxed on the value of the will you are leaving. This would only cause to start adding their childrens names to things before they die so they would have ownership.
December 16 2010 at 1:20 PM Report abuse Permalink +7 rate up rate down ReplyYou can now give away a fixed amount of your accumulated wealth to your heirs and others. Not sure of the limits or timing, I consider them quite a good way to get around the "final solution". Why wait, greedy or controlling???
December 16 2010 at 6:32 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyIf the house turns it down then just wait until Jan 3 and bring it up for a vote.
December 16 2010 at 1:16 PM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyWho is taking everybody hostage this time. Democrats are you calling farmers the enemy now. Dairy farmers works 7 days a week to earn a living. With cows, equipment, land, barnes and milk house. Thier farm would be valued higher than that. But they make very little money so thier children would lose or have to sell the business to pay the death tax. They have payed taxes thier whole life to see government take it from thier children. This is evil
December 16 2010 at 1:15 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyI agree the estate tax is ridiculous no government should be allowed to tax what has already been taxed local, state and the fed period. But I must add these farmers get fedral subsidies corresponding to there size and build wealth off the tax payers back which should be stopped. We the people pay subsidies for more and more businesses even to relocate overseas hence free market?
December 22 2010 at 6:49 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyObama may need to delay his Hawaii vacation; but I think he will make his negotiated deal stick.
December 16 2010 at 12:45 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyIt is time to stand up to the Republicans who have made it clear that they do not care about 98% of the people in this country. If they could raise taxes on the working 98% and end all taxes on the richest 2% thats what they would do. It is time for the 2% that get the most from the gov't to start paying their fair share.
December 16 2010 at 12:37 PM Report abuse Permalink -10 rate up rate down Replyright on the money mr motorprops
December 16 2010 at 1:06 PM Report abuse Permalink -6 rate up rate down ReplyActually its quite clear the Democrats in the House are the obstructionists. A bill was sent to them that was negotiated by THEIR President and passed the Senate 81-19 with bi-partisan support. Now Speaker Pelosi refuses to allow that bill to advance for an up or down vote. It seems the Democrats are really the "Party of NO".
December 16 2010 at 1:14 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyWhen beneficiaries have to sell their inherited property to pay taxes to the government, something is seriously wrong...
December 16 2010 at 12:20 PM Report abuse Permalink +10 rate up rate down ReplyObama shook hands on this deal. Like world leaders, his own Party does not respect him enough to honor his deal.
December 16 2010 at 12:10 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyAaaa,maybe its a bad deal?
December 16 2010 at 12:49 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyRule One in the art of the compromise - Make sure all parties to the deal are involved in making the deal. The White House foolishly made this deal with Senate Republicans, without any involvement of House Democrats. It is a fiscally irresponsible deal to give any tax cuts at a time of massive budget deficits. The deal should be voted down - period.
December 16 2010 at 10:09 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThere should be NO estate tax. If it was earned it should be able to be passed on without the government taking 35 - 45 % Once again it's the government taking something they don't deserve to spend on something they don't need.
December 16 2010 at 9:45 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
20 Comments