AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
The attempt to frame a deficit-cutting plan that can win approval on Capitol Hill follows the report on Dec. 1 of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Those recommendations for cutting and pinching government spending in the face of trillion dollar-plus annual deficits took plenty of hits from the political left and right.
The report was approved 11-7 by the president's panel, but that was three votes short of the 14 needed to guarantee consideration by Congress. The commission called for reductions in defense spending, gradually raising the retirement age for Social Security, rolling back the home mortgage deduction and numerous other cuts bound to offend one special interest or another.
Warner and Chambliss want to use that report as a starting point for what might be legislatively doable on Capitol Hill. It is important, Chambliss said, to get a plan in place next year -- before the onset of the political pressures of the 2012 presidential election campaign. In the meantime, Warner said the informal group has agreed to a "cease-fire on immediately criticizing each other's ideas."
Follow Tom Diemer on Twitter http://twitter.com/tomdiemer
The greedy goverment is now under fire to clean itsself up and if the republicans can show a meaningfull attempt at spending cuts in even small ways that add up the republicans will be in power for along time. Our democrats showed a very ugly hand again by keeping Pelosi and Reid as failures in the eyes of voters.
December 22 2010 at 1:00 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWith dems retaining the WH and Senate, I am not optimistic in the plan to reduce the deficit. The backbone of the dem party is social programs and other trillion dollar plans to create more voting blocks. Ironically the politicians resemble the right and are mostly weathly to ultra-wealthy and their programs seemed to design to assist but rarely actually lift anyone out of their social prdicaments, because that would destroy the dependent voting base.
December 21 2010 at 11:39 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyThe Republicans are truly the party of anti-intellectualism. A poll came out today that showed 52% of all Republicans believe in strict creationism, that mankind has only been here 10,000 years and that evolution is not valid. Add this to the hare-brained Republican mantra that global warming is not true and you have a scary number of ignorant people populating the Republican party. Sarah Palin is emblematic of the type of idiots we are now seeing surface in the Republican party. It's a circular firing squad and the Republicans are all crack shots! Mark Montgomery NYC, NY boboberg@nyc.rr.com
December 21 2010 at 4:24 PM Report abuse Permalink -4 rate up rate down ReplyNothing new here. As the Gallup Poll states, Most Americans believe in God, and about 85% have a religious identity. American attitudes and the basic structure of beliefs about human beings' origins is generally the same as it was in the early 1980s. Dems. and Reps. alike share these views, although to a lesser belief in creationism among Dems.
December 22 2010 at 10:08 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyCut the THOUSANDS of gov't employees added by the Obama administration, and get their pay/pensions/benefits in line with the private sector, and on the same healthcare options. There was a report yesterday that a school teacher who works to age 59 years, or for more than 20 years, and earns $78,000, will be entitled to approx $58,000 pension. One making $110,000, under the same parameters, would be entitled to $89,000. How can this be sustained? They are raising retirement for the private sector, and cutting SS and Medicare, but a gov't worked can realistically work to 55, collect a huge pension, while holding another job. This cannot continue.
December 21 2010 at 3:09 PM Report abuse Permalink +7 rate up rate down ReplyI see this playing out just like the health care debacle. They will spend a year and a half kicking this around resulting in a non-productive outcome while other issues which could actually invigorate our economy and the employment situation are ignored and they inflate the deficit further with their own payrolls and pet projects.
December 21 2010 at 1:01 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyThere hasn't been a spending bill Warner hasn't voted for, why the switch??
December 21 2010 at 12:50 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners





Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
8 Comments