Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Bishop Says Hospital That Aborted Dying Fetus to Save Mother No Longer Catholic

3 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The Roman Catholic Bishop of Phoenix has stripped St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center of its 115-year church affiliation because administrators -- including a nun -- allowed doctors to remove a dying 11-week-old fetus from a mother of four because she would have died without the procedure.

Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted said the procedure was an abortion, which can never be justified under church teaching. He added that because the hospital would not agree to demands to acknowledge the error and operate under his direct supervision it could no longer use the "Catholic" label or have Mass celebrated at the chapel.

"It is my duty to decree that, in the Diocese of Phoenix, at St. Joseph's Hospital, CHW [Catholic Healthcare West] is not committed to following the teaching of the Catholic Church and therefore this hospital cannot be considered Catholic," Olmsted said at a news conference.

Catholic Healthcare West is the San Francisco-based parent company of St. Joseph's.

"The Catholic faithful are free to seek care or to offer care at St. Joseph's Hospital," he added, "but I cannot guarantee that the care provided will be in full accord with the teachings of the Church."

Hospital president Linda Hunt said the medical center was "deeply disappointed" by Olmsted's action and pledged that St. Joseph's "will continue through our words and deeds to carry out the healing ministry of Jesus."

"Consistent with our values of dignity and justice, if we are presented with a situation in which a pregnancy threatens a woman's life, our first priority is to save both patients," Hunt said in a statement. "If that is not possible we will always save the life we can save, and that is what we did in this case."

"We continue to stand by the decision, which was made in collaboration with the patient, her family, her caregivers, and our Ethics Committee. Morally, ethically, and legally we simply cannot stand by and let someone die whose life we might be able to save."

Olmsted disagreed. "There is no way to rationalize this," he said. "It would have been best to try to save them both."

He did not say what should be done if that were not possible. Olmsted also said the hospital was violating other Catholic directives by affiliating with facilities that provided sterilization, contraceptives and in vitro fertilization. But ending the pregnancy was the tipping point in his problematic relationship with St. Joseph's.

The case in question concerned a 27-year-old woman, a Catholic, who was already a mother of four and had become pregnant again despite efforts not to conceive because she suffered from pulmonary hypertension that could endanger her life and that of her fetus.

A 24-page report on the case prepared for the hospital and Bishop Olmsted by a Catholic moral theologian -- and published late Tuesday by the website of Commonweal magazine -- reveals that when the woman consulted her pulmonologist on Oct. 12, 2009, when she was seven weeks pregnant, he advised her to have an abortion because of the risks.

Because of her moral objections, she declined. Three weeks later, on Nov. 3, 2009, the woman was admitted to St. Joseph's Hospital with worsening symptoms that included "severe, life-threatening pulmonary hypertension," "right heart failure," and "cardiogenic shock."

She was told by several different doctors that her chance of dying "approaches 100 percent" if she were to continue the pregnancy.

Moreover, according to the report by moral theologian M. Therese Lysaught of Marquette University, by Nov. 5, "mother and fetus were both in the process of dying" and only the mother could be saved.
"Due to the age of the fetus, there was no possibility that it could survive outside the womb," Lysaught wrote. "Nor, due to the mother's heart failure and cardiogenic shock, was there any possibility that the fetus could survive inside the womb."

"In short, in spite of the best efforts of the mother and of her medical staff, the fetus had become terminal, not because of a pathology of its own but because of a pathology in its maternal environment. There was no longer any chance that the life of this child could be saved."

"This is crucial to note insofar as it establishes that at the point of decision, it was not a case of saving the mother or the child. It was not a matter of choosing one life or the other. The child's life, because of natural causes, was in the process of ending."
The hospital's ethics committee, which included Sister Margaret Mary McBride, a hospital administrator, agreed that surgeons could perform a procedure that would remove the placenta, which was the creating the toxic situation for the fetus and mother. Under accepted Catholic medical directives, that would obviously result in the death of the fetus but would ostensibly not be considered a "direct abortion" -- that is, killing the fetus as a primary objective -- because the fetus would die as the result of another procedure.

The ethical thinking here is akin to a pregnant woman who has a cancerous uterus removed. Even if she is pregnant, the death of the fetus would be considered a "secondary effect" from the cancer treatment and therefore acceptable under Catholic medical directives approved by the nation's bishops.

But Olmsted and his ethics advisers disagreed with the arguments both by the hospital and Lysaught.

"In this case, the baby was healthy and there were no problems with the pregnancy; rather, the mother had a disease that needed to be treated," Olmsted said. "But instead of treating the disease, St. Joseph's medical staff and ethics committee decided that the healthy, 11-week-old baby should be directly killed."

So after months of what were described as "complex" talks, the bishop moved to strip the hospital of its Catholic designation.

Late Tuesday, Sister Carol Keehan, head of the Catholic Health Association, which represents more than 600 Catholic hospitals around the country, issued a statement saying that St. Joseph's had "correctly applied" Catholic medical directives in this case.

Olmsted only found out about the case in May of this year, several months after the pregnancy was terminated, and when he did he said that Sister McBride was automatically excommunicated for her part in the decision and had her reassigned.

The case generated national coverage and put a spotlight on Olmsted, a strongly conservative bishop who was described in a profile last spring in the National Catholic Reporter as a punctilious, policy-driven churchman who insists everyone play by the rules.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

42 Comments

Filter by:
ADRIENNE

removing a dead fetus from a live person is not an abortion. it's called saving a life. an abortion is removing a live fetus from a person who does not wish to have that fetus develop and born.

January 24 2011 at 3:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
N.A. Pacione

I am a Pentacostal, and believe that Abortion is murder. This is one of those that I have to say was under the circumstance that she was going to end up meeting thy maker if the fetus wasn't removed. I have disturbing nightmares about having a mother of my son birthing a stillborn. This dying fetus would have been a stillborn.

January 11 2011 at 12:15 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
haileinar

This bishop is a fool ; this is the type of thing which will ultimately result in the demise of catholicism .

January 08 2011 at 1:02 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
kloel

If you're not a Catholic, there's no way you could understand the teachings, and it does not concern you anyway. Why don't you try to do something to stop the abortions of the innocents that has killed 50,000,000 babies, and still goes on today?

December 30 2010 at 6:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mbrahms26

One of the mnay reasons I am glad I am no longer a Catholic. This church is nothing more than a perverted, misogynistic cult and has been from the beginning.

Ecrasez l'enfame.

Voltaire

December 30 2010 at 3:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bobpell

This is probably the best thing that could happen to the hospital. Who would really want to be associated with an organization that would do such a thing. Like Rodney Dangerfield said "I don't want to be a member of a club that would allow someone like me to be a member".

December 30 2010 at 12:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mimi

when will the catholic church start respecting women and stop allowing them to die?

December 29 2010 at 10:25 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
gwhjelm

After all of the Sexual Child Molestations by the Catholic Church and they want to discredit a hospital for saqving a life when baby was dying in his/her mother. All I can say is wow, and what a bunch of inconsiderate bastards who run the American Cathloic Church. When God has "The Judgement Day", I wouldn't want to be a leader in the Cathloic Church.

December 29 2010 at 2:45 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Moonwind

I am not Catholic, but know many that I love dearly, and I am very pro life, but my God, it seems to me that there are situations where the church must step back and show a caring side, and this is totally ridiculous. So the mother dies before the baby can survive out side of her womb. Now the baby is four or five months into gestation, so the baby still dies. The church tries to play God, and judge, and I think that is God's job, to act like God.

December 28 2010 at 11:42 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
jake191218

This bishop has a problem. He sees nothing wrong with letting the mother die. What about her four other children. They would be left without a mother.If men were the ones that gave birth we would be playing by a whole different set of rules.

December 28 2010 at 8:47 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>