Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Joe Miller Won't Oppose Certification of Murkowski as Alaska Senator

4 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Joe Miller, who has waged a long battle to wrest away Lisa Murkowski's U.S. Senate seat, now says he will not oppose state certification of her election. However, the tea party-backed Republican nominee said on his website late Sunday that he will press his federal lawsuit aiming for a recount of the Nov. 2 results because "the integrity of the election is vital and ultimately the rule of law must be our standard."

Miller defeated Murkowski in the GOP primary in August -- after receiving the endorsement of former governor Sarah Palin -- only to lose when the incumbent staged a write-in campaign in the general election. He has contested the results, based on misspellings or other irregularities on more than 8,000 ballots. But he said he decided to withdraw his opposition to the certification of the election in order to ensure "that Alaska will have its full delegation seated when the 112th Congress convenes next month." His decision to continue his court case, he added, "will allow Alaskans to focus on bringing fairness and transparency to our elections process without distraction of the certification issue."

Miller's challenge of the write-in votes is based on a strict reading of the state election law, which says that a candidate's name must be spelled correctly and that an accompanying oval on the ballot be properly filled in. The state election board, backed by subsequent court rulings, has said that voter intent should be the guiding force in counting the votes.

U.S. District Judge Ralph Beistline had stayed certification of Murkowski's election while Miller continued to pursue his challenge, but is now expected to lift that stay.

Unofficial tallies show Murkowski with a lead of over 10,000 votes. Even if the 8,000 challenged ballots were thrown out, her victory would stand.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:

Lets see now...If I have this picture correct the person counting the votes has the discretion of determining "voter intent" even though the Alaska election code states that if a write-in name is spelled incorrectly will disqualify the vote. Since a write-in candidate has very little chance to win in the first place, do you suppose that some votes for Joe were marked for Lisa because the person counting the votes wanted her to win by determining voter-intent. Just asking.

December 27 2010 at 1:04 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to AL's comment

No, I don't suppose so. My name is Sparling, but even people who know me well have spelled it Spalding, Spradling, Sperling, Sparkling, or some other variation. Trying to cheat someone out of their vote just because they can't spell very well reminds me of the literacy tests used to keep black voters out of the polls in the Jim Crow south.

December 28 2010 at 4:09 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>