Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Will 'Gay' Issue Create a Conservative Schism?

4 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Fresh on the heels of Congress repealing "Don't ask, don't tell," there are reverberations within the conservative movement that have gone largely unnoticed by the media.

First (though probably least interesting), is news that the Family Research Council and Concerned Women for America will boycott the Conservative Political Action Conference -- the largest gathering of conservatives each year in Washington. Socially conservative groups -- and FRC and CWA are among the more prominent ones -- are upset that GOProud, a conservative gay group, will play a prominent role at the conference, set for Feb. 10-12.

Regardless of where you come down on the fundamental issue at hand, my contention that social-conservative groups are not terribly savvy was probably confirmed when news of their boycott was first reported by World Net Daily, considered by many to be on the fringe of the conservative movement.

The boycotters might have instead talked to National Review or Townhall (where I formerly worked). But by leaking to (or breaking the story with) World Net Daily, these groups have symbolically cast their cause as outside the mainstream of conservatism (while CPAC now occupies the mainstream turf, at least for now).

While GOProud's involvement with CPAC has clearly created tension within various conservative groups, conservative bloggers and thinkers are still debating the repeal of "Don't ask, don't tell." (The notion that conservatives are monolithic is a canard, and the debate taking place on the blogs makes that painfully clear.)

On one side of the argument is Jonah Goldberg, who, in an L.A. Times column, makes a nuanced argument that the very notion that homosexuals want to engage in "bourgeois" institutions such as monogamous marriage and the military proves conservatism has, in a sense, won.

As Goldberg jokes, "So now openly gay soldiers get to fight and die in neocon-imperialist wars too?" He later suggests we "look at the decision to let gays openly serve in the military through the eyes of a principled hater of all things military. From that perspective, gays have just been co-opted by the Man."

But conservative blogger Robert Stacy McCain disagrees, writing,
what is happening is not the bourgeoisification of radicalism; rather, it's the radicalization of the bourgeoisie. If the American middle class adopts more and more the radical-egalitarian worldview of the Left, this cannot be sold as a triumph of conservatism, no matter how cleverly Jonah Goldberg or any other Official Conservative Spokesman frames that argument.
Clearly there are disagreements taking place among conservatives over the "gay" issue. It is unclear whether these are mere bumps in the road, or if they will lead to a major schism on the right.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:
Pajaro de Llames

And so....@Log­CabinGOP, @GOProud..­.why are you conservati­ve again? Oh, that's riiight, you think being white & male is enough to pretend the world revolves around you.mmGues­s not---acco­rding to CPAC, the biggest right-wing political fundraiser outside of the U.S.Chambe­r of Commerce..­..Still doesn't explain minority, nor female conservati­ves though---u­nless they just aren't aware of what they truly represent.­{?} GOFigure.

December 29 2010 at 4:23 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

We may be witnessing a civil war brewing within the Republican Party, which is now stuck in a quandary. The party's base is overwhemingly white, middle and upper class and deeply religious. The evangelical element in all of this is not to be underestimated, ever since Ronald Reagan piggybacked the evangelicals onto the party in 1980 (remember the moral majority?). To accept homosexuality is to spit at the party base.

But there are gay republicans, which is why the fringe is going nutbags over it.

December 29 2010 at 3:20 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

The social conservatives in the Republican party keep those of us who support fiscal conservatism voting for the Democrats; conscience over wallet, as it were.

December 29 2010 at 11:10 AM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to pgbrooke's comment

Yes, it would be nice if both sides could put away the playground mentality of "my team is better than yours" and act like adults. My wife and I are on the same page fiscally but, as I am apparently something of a Neanderthal, we seldom agree on social issues and yet have been married for almost 25 years. You don't have to agree completely with the other side, just respect their opinion and find middle ground. That, in my opinion, is what's missing not just from politics but from contemporary American culture.

December 29 2010 at 11:31 AM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>