Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Boehner in Wonderland: Kill Health Care Before Reviewing the Evidence

3 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Now that Speaker John Boehner has been handed Hagrid's gavel, the first order of policy business for the newly empowered House Republicans is eradicating President Obama's health care reform package by passing HR 2, which is titled -- seriously -- "Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act."

The measure, scheduled for a quick vote next Wednesday, will pass with Republican votes, but it won't go anywhere: Democrats in the Senate won't bother with it, and Obama has already vowed to veto the measure, if it ever reaches his desk. Which it won't. But this stunt -- being conducted instead of real business (such as proposing alternative legislation that would address the nation's health care woes or bills that might spur job creation) -- has placed GOP hypocrisy on display.

The Republicans, who have proclaimed fealty to congressional due process and deficit tracking, are rushing ahead with a vote on the bill without holding hearings or a committee mark-up and without submitting it to the nonprofit Congressional Budget Office to determine its impact on deficits. Still, the CBO has issued a statement stating that repeal of the health care law will add $230 billion to the deficits through the next ten years.

So the games have begun. But perhaps the biggest (bad) joke is in the name of this bill. The Republicans are once again trying to win an argument by making a provocative assertion they cannot prove -- such as when they falsely claimed Obama's recovery package had not created a single new job. (The CBO calculated the legislation had saved or created about 3.5 million jobs.)

This time, the assertion is another simplistic mantra: Obamacare kills jobs. On Thursday, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the new House majority leader, indicated that undoing the health care measure is the GOP's top priority when it comes to dealing with the country's economic troubles: "Obamacare spends a trillion dollars that we don't have and kills jobs at a time when our top priority must be getting people back to work. This job-killing health care law has caused great uncertainty for employers small and large and has put our country on a path to fiscal insolvency."

Cantor didn't say anything about the screw-ups that led to the Bush-Cheney crash that threw the economy into a ravine. The true problem with the economy is not a health care bill that has yet to be fully implemented. That aside, Cantor's specific charge that the bill is a job-killer is empty rhetoric.

On Thursday, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a Washington think tank that supports the bill, released a report noting that according to the CBO's conclusions Obama health care reform will not be a destroyer of jobs The CBO estimates that health care reform will have little effect on health care premiums for businesses and will likely reduce them between 0 and 3 percent in 2016 for businesses with more than 50 workers (which is 70 percent of the total insurance market). Smaller businesses, the CBO projects, will see premiums change in the range from a 1-percent hike to a 2-percent drop. The CBPP report quotes a Moody's Analytics finding concluding that "the net long-run impact [of the health care law] on the economy will be minor."

CBPP maintains, "House Republicans are crying wolf about potential negative effects of health reform on labor markets." It also points out that Cantor and Co. are ignoring the aspects of the health care measure that could have a positive effect on the economy, such as greater labor flexibility and healthier workers.

CBPP analysts are honest enough to admit that the law could wield some negative impacts on the labor market, but it seconds CBO's bottom-line conclusion that overall the effects (both positive and negative) will be modest. The GOPers don't engage in such intellectual candor. They opt for brazen exaggeration when they dub the measure a "job-killer," let alone place that term in the title of the bill. (By the way, here's a fun fact: In the short speech Boehner delivered when he became speaker on Wednesday, he did not once mention "jobs.")

Are CBPP and CBO correct in their appraisals of Obama's health care law? There's no way to know for certain. The same, though, has to be said for the GOP's apocalyptic prediction. Which is why the GOP's approach to legislating is fundamentally phony. If the Republicans truly believe there is a solid case for their claim that the health care bill will (further) wreck the economy, they ought to hold hearings and invite experts from all sides. Let their favorite analysts mix it up with folks from CBO, CBPP, and Moody's. Live on C-SPAN!

Boehner and his crew should try to win the argument with facts, not hyperbolic statements. If they are indeed fans of responsible read-the-bill-first governing, as they claim, this is the least they can do. Instead, they're behaving like the Red Queen: "sentence first -- verdict afterward." Actually, there won't be any verdict (that is, hearings) afterward. Just the sentence: kill it.

Welcome to Boehner's wonderland. You can fill in your own joke about a tea party.

You can follow David Corn's postings and media appearances via Twitter.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

40 Comments

Filter by:
Pat

Since the days of Ronald Reagan's hyperbole about "trickle down economics" the Republicans have been expertly using hyperbole to cloak everything they stand for in a shroud of cloud so that people could not see the reality of their goals. Unfortunately for Republicans, they have spent so much time and energy on hyperbole they haven't put any intelligent thought into anything. Hence, we have people like John Boehner and his cohort in the House of Representatives who clearly do not take time and make the effort to think anything through. Their mouths are always in motion but their brains are never in gear.

January 18 2011 at 5:04 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
jwdenson

Thank you David for your level statements.
I am concerned about the misinformation and the hot retoric that is all around me. I have been traveling in Rural Texas on business and I overhear conversations. The people out there are sold on the propaganda. It is the only information available. I ask for the source of the statements. Most deny the source of say they heard it on the news. It looks darker and darker for cool heads to prevail.

January 16 2011 at 1:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Peter

Being covered by Health Insurance when lossing a job, makes all the diffeence in the life of a working family that pays taxes, that is asked to send its sons & daughters to war

January 14 2011 at 8:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Peter

WHY do the laws of Supply & Demand not apply to Medical treatment?
Why is training youth to be snipers more appealing than healthcare proessionals?
Why would the Government spend billions on weapons, but Diagnostic Labs & technology NO WAY? THe answer is GOP Greedy Old People

January 14 2011 at 8:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dux4susi

Has a Gov't program ever cost what is projected? (or less)

January 09 2011 at 7:35 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
luapmi2

I understand why Corn wants to see what happens first...there is a gutteral excitement in watching all train wrecks.

January 09 2011 at 6:56 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
rat5678

Boehner: Where are the jobs?

January 09 2011 at 6:07 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rob & Kathy

Well, the Democrats passed it before reviewing the evidence...

January 08 2011 at 9:18 PM Report abuse -8 rate up rate down Reply
jdb1955

The massive increases that are occurring in medical premiums since Obama Care was signed by the Whitehouse is the best leading indicator as to the cost of the bill. Insurers are facing adverse selection and the inability to under write coverage for individuals and small groups. People who have preexisting conditions (diagnosed when they have no insurance or minimal coverage's) will be buying the broadest coverage that the insurer has. This is why underwriters are having to build reserves to cover the mass of minimally insured's who will be demanding coverage's.
From the tone and half truths that David Corn has woven into his article its obvious that he has a liberal progressive attitude and cannot produce a meaningful article that at least brings up the areas of the bill that most creditable journalists have determined will cost considerably more that originally claimed by the backers of the bill. The bill has to be changed/modified so that we don't end up with a system like Canada or Great Britten have where drugs are rationed, services are restricted and waiting times for procedures are weeks or months. Why do many Canadians come to this side of the border when the need serious medical care. The bill will destroy the World's best medical system

January 08 2011 at 1:38 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
joe

Maybe it is best to kill Obamacare before the severe lack of physician support kills it. There is already a plan for "other medical professionals" to see the patient before the patient is given access to the doctor. Then what happens if that other medical professional misdiagnoses the patients problem and the patient dies? Oh well there will be absolutely no possiblity that the patient's family can sue the government. Right?. Which puts the trial lawyers out of business. Right? There will be no insurance companies to sue because they will all be out of business too. What else does anyone need to know before they support repeal of this monstrous, confusing and unworkable mess?

January 08 2011 at 1:30 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>