AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Yet Monday, Palin insisted to Hannity that she was "being falsely accused, of being accessory to murder." Meanwhile, she called Loughner a "left-leaning criminal who killed these innocents."Sarah Palin hit pieces is about all this liberal AOL "journalist" ( among others) writes about. Palin and her family are almost daily bombarded wiith hit pieces from TV,blogs and the liberal AOL writers
January 19 2011 at 8:07 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyWhen is this obsession with Sarah Palin going to end , I have nothing against her but the Media's obsession with her is just driving me to just stop watching TV because there is never a station that just will not go a day without trashing her . They say she is spreading hate but as I listen to her I here no such thing coming out of her mouth at all . They want people to hate her so they just seem to fear her and I can't understand why?
January 18 2011 at 10:55 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyEvery time I hear people criticize Sarah Palin I think, wow, she must be terrible. So I listen to her with more intense interest. Every time I listen to her I think she is really very sound with a very good message. I admire her confidence, her resiliance, and her inteeligence. It is the media that loses my respect every time they talk about her. That is because what they are saying is not supported when i watch and listen to her. Why are they so inclined to criticize her? That is the bewilderment here. If she were so incapable the media would pass her up as a harmless home maker busy with her children. But the media refuses to stop focusing on her. That is very telling. That is where Sarah wants to be. Good job, Sarah!
January 18 2011 at 9:19 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyAnd what exactly is her messege? For a few years now I have listened to her blab about how terrible the government is, how we need to take out country back(from who), but never ever says what she would do to fix things. I woudl never vote for someone that only knows how to undermne everyone else without them explaining what they would do. This woman is so full of herself, makes huge demands to listen to her speak (best Hotel rooms, 1st class airfare ect..) just some of her demands. Then she laughs all the way to the bank on the backs of all the people she is duping.
January 18 2011 at 10:23 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyI live in Tucson where "Crosshair Rhetoric" inflames those with very limited judgement capabilities. It is very easy for Sarah Palin to deny her culpability. If she really believed in her message, she wouldn't be back peddaling so hard. But the truth is that she has blood on her hands and is now trying to wash it off. Gabby called her out on the "Crosshair Ad" back in March. She voiced her concern about those who are swayed by this kind of rhetoric. Ironiclly our community has suffered many losses because of a madman with a gun. Ideology created by a "Lock and Load" mindset about gun control that continues to lead our children to the slaughter.
January 18 2011 at 8:17 PM Report abuse Permalink +9 rate up rate down ReplyMs. Palin loves her some freedom of speech. what she doesn't seem to like is the responsibility that goes with that freedom. it is illegal to yell "fire" in a crowded theater unless of course if there actually is fire in said theater. it is not illegal to use inflammatory rhetoric, to "target" polical opponents or say that there are "second amendment remedies"; however, not using such language is the responsible thing to do. to expect some civility in our political discourse is not censorship nor is it an attempt to curb freedom of speech. it is an attempt to make things less volitile and nasty and violent.
.
All of this reminds me of something I read recently. It is a joke that harkens back to a day when people really knew how to insult each other with style.
.
George Bernard Shaw to Winston Churchill: "I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend...if you have one."
Winston Churchill, in response: "Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second...if there is one."
.
And then there is this quote from William Karr: "He had delusions of adequacy".
Sarah was just letting everyone know that she is not going to be silenced by the verbal attacks on her nor is she going to alter the language that she uses because some critics say she is not politically correct. Would the people that are constantly spouting the hate speech against Sarah be willing to take the blame if Sarah was physically attacked????
January 18 2011 at 7:26 PM Report abuse Permalink -16 rate up rate down ReplyPalin is a personality and nothing else. She has very little else to give the country.
January 18 2011 at 7:11 PM Report abuse Permalink +12 rate up rate down ReplyCritics have probably tanked Palin's political candidate prospects with a barrage of parodies and snarky attacks. That does not mean that she has nothing to offer, or that her political policy thinking is invalid. Think of it this way: she was running for Joe Biden's job...
January 18 2011 at 7:08 PM Report abuse Permalink -14 rate up rate down ReplySara Palin tanked her own Political Career. The interview with Catic Curic started it all. She cannot be sucessful as a national candidate on a local or specific media base. She cannot speak only to her own belief's and not addresss why she would be against others and answer questions that are involved in thoes issues. Her appearance on Fox is planned with pre-planned answers and as a top political candadate or even running as President she has to be able to stand on her feet in front of all and stand her ground and she is unable to do that. Her interview that flubbed with Catie Couric still has her afraid to truly Meet The Press and that a President does not Make
January 18 2011 at 7:37 PM Report abuse Permalink +17 rate up rate down ReplyWhile is was not her fault Palin now admits that they were crosshairs. I was trying to rembember who was the first person to equate Palin's name with rhetoric with potential for violence. Oh yes, it was Gabrielle Giffords. Hard to argue with her.
January 18 2011 at 6:59 PM Report abuse Permalink +18 rate up rate down ReplyBut was Giffords also decrying the hateful rhetoric from the left? Perhaps she should have been, since apparently the madman who shot her was left leaning! Neither Palin nor Giffords is responsible for this mass murder...Jarid Loughner was a mentally ill man who had been angry with Giffords since talking to her in 2007, long before the last presidential election, much less the last midterm election!
January 18 2011 at 8:46 PM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyI liked watching the Alaska Show. It's a beautiful place. A better narrator could have been used. Sarah Palin should stay in Alaska and raise her nice family. Enjoy her aging parents. The policical arena will chew her up. No chance at winning..Running would be a waste of energy and a unnecessay selfish burden on her family..Be a good Wife and Mother stay home.
January 18 2011 at 6:26 PM Report abuse Permalink +20 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners





Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
160 Comments