Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Rahm Emanuel Back On Chicago Mayoral Ballot for Now as Court Issues Stay

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The Illinois Supreme Court on Tuesday temporarily put Chicago mayoral hopeful Rahm Emanuel back on the ballot, issuing a stay of Monday's ruling that the former White House chief of staff gave up his local residency when he moved to Washington to work for President Obama.

The seven-member state Supreme Court also decided later on Tuesday to hear the case, and Emanuel's lawyers asked it to rule on an expedited basis. The court said there would be no oral arguments and the case will be decided by the briefs already on file in the Illinois Appellate Court.

In the filing asking the state Supreme Court to take the case, Emanuel lawyers argued that the 2-1 ruling by an Illinois appellate panel was "one of the most far-reaching election law rulings ever to be issued by an Illinois court," one that imposes "unprecedented restrictions" of future candidates to run in Illinois municipal elections. Emanuel was tossed off the ballot Monday on the grounds that he did not meet residency requirements to run for mayor.

A day later, the state Supreme Court, in a one-page order, said the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners should include Emanuel's name on any ballots being printed in advance of the Feb. 22 primary.
The order said that "the emergency motion by petitioner Rahm Emanuel for stay pending appeal is allowed in part. The appellate court decision is stayed. The Board of Elections is directed that if any ballots are printed while this Court is considering this case, the ballots should include the name of petitioner Rahm Emanuel as a candidate for Mayor of the City of Chicago. That part of the motion requesting expedited consideration of the petition for leave to appeal remains pending."

The Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, which started printing ballots without Emanuel's name, reversed course with the high court order.

"Shortly before noon, we called the printer, Lake County Press, and essentially told them, 'Stop the presses,' '' board chairman Langdon Neal told the Chicago Sun-Times.


"Almost 300,000 [of the 2 million total] ballots had actually already been printed. Now, they're re-formatting the ballot to include the name of Rahm Emanuel on the ballot and that printing will then begin again."

Meanwhile on Tuesday, Emanuel continued with his campaign, pushing on as the fate of his candidacy now sits with the state justices -- one of whom is married to a powerful Chicago alderman who backs one of Emanuel's top rivals.

Chicago is a big union town and some unions have been cool to Emanuel's bid. He did, however, pick up the endorsement Tuesday of the Chicago Teamsters Joint Council 25. President John Coli said at a press conference that "we are ready to support this candidacy at all costs."

Rival Gery Chico won the backing Tuesday morning of the Chicago firefighters union.

Emanuel said at the Teamsters press conference that he will push ahead. "The most important thing, as you know, is my determination and my sense of certainty -- not certainty, but confidence -- in the sense that in the end we will be on the ballot so that people will have that option to vote."

In a related matter, White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett said Tuesday that President Obama believes his former chief of staff should be eligible to run for mayor.

Jarrett's remark came on ABC's "Good Morning America" when co-host George Stephanopoulos asked her what Obama thought of the appellate decision.

"We haven't talked to Rahm," she said, "but I'll tell you one thing we know is that he's going to vigorously appeal. Rahm is a fighter, and I'm sure . . . he will vigorously make [his] case."

Stephanopoulos asked if it is "fair assume . . . that the president did believe that Rahm is eligible and the appeals court is wrong?"

Replied Jarrett: "Well, I think that he believes that he's eligible, and I believe that he believes that Rahm will pursue his appeal in the courts. And as he said then, he thinks Rahm would make a terrific mayor."

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

150 Comments

Filter by:
rosemaryram

There were three Appellate Judges, two who were black ladies and one white male. The two black Appellate Judges voted against Emanuel while the white Appellate Judge voted for Emanuel. Yes, even in the high court, there is, unfortunately, racial divide. I think these ladies should be investigated for their true motive.

January 27 2011 at 7:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ajallenky

Being a " FORMER " resident of Chicago, I can now sit back and chuckle about the political hacks and all the underhanded Democratic controlled tricks to control the city - hope he gets the boot - and if he does, then look for his buddy, THE ANOINTED ONE, to put him back on the Gov't payroll in Washington - he WILL be on someone's payroll, you can make book on that !!!!

January 26 2011 at 6:26 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Frank

The big question isn't what the law says, but what the intent of the law is. The intent of the law is to prevent outsiders, non-Chicagoans, persons without knowledge of Chicago and without daily living in Chicago from running for mayor. I'm not a Rahm fan, but if justice is fair I think he should be allowed to run. Chicago was, is and will be his home. Being "at the service of the President" should not disqualify him.

January 26 2011 at 2:40 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
chaosseed

This whole situation is an attempt to subvert the peoples choices. Let him on the ballot and give the people the choice. If we want him as mayor we want him. We don't need political wrangling to limit our options. It would be grievously wrong to punish him for going to Washington to serve the people and we use it as an excuse to say he is no longer a "Chicagoan." I'm sure when he finished serving the people of the United States he would return home to Chicago. I'm assuming people would apply this same logic to others who choose to serve the larger populous as a whole. Would you all feel the same way if the same logic was applied to the troops that serve our country? This whole argument against his candidacy is a sad manipulation,

January 26 2011 at 12:32 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
joe

When they told Ole Rahm that he could not run for Mayor in Chicago he simply went out and bought a few dead fish at the market. He wrapped each one in newspaper and delivered them and presto Ole Rahm is back on the ballot.

January 26 2011 at 12:30 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
barrettm107a1

In support of common sense, he has deep roots and ties to Chicago for decades. The intent of the law was to keep carpet baggers out and the power structure in place. The law does make it clear he cannot become Mayor this time but that doesn't matter here in Chitown. He will be on the ballot.

January 25 2011 at 11:02 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
girvan1234

This type behavior is what turns most Americans off. Corruption is at the root of this situation. He is above the law being from Chicago, and having a White House background, I can't begin to think of the political mischief he'll engage in. To think that the presidential 2012 re-election campaign HQ will be in Chicago, is an outright insult to our intelligence.

January 25 2011 at 10:30 PM Report abuse +15 rate up rate down Reply
ddan8719

As i commented two weeks ago..this crook has friends in high places..and in reality could declare him-self the winner right now with no election..and the illinois supreme court would agree..and the citizens would simply shake there heads in agreement..well.. he would have won anyway, why go to all that trouble..
congrats chicago you deserve everthing you get..and more..

January 25 2011 at 9:58 PM Report abuse +20 rate up rate down Reply
jsrfire

I work for the city of Chicago. I am required by my employment to RESIDE within the city limits. I CANNOT own a house here, rent it out, and live in another municipality. If I did, it would most assuredly cost me my employment. Why does anyone think that just because this individual is running for public office, that he can skirt the very rule of employment that ALL city workers must adhere to? The one and only reason that he may still be running for mayor is that he is part of the famous Chicago Machine. I hope that our Good Judges sitting on this issue uphold the very worthy decision of the lower court. Rahm Emanuel will ruin this city worse than his predecessor has already done.

January 25 2011 at 9:53 PM Report abuse +18 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jsrfire's comment
chaosseed

You fail to point out that the Chicago employment policy allows new employees a time frame to establish a residency in the city limits. They do not restrict their hiring to current city residents. This is a poor analogy.

January 26 2011 at 12:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ocbrog

Why don't you people understand this is not about "residency"? It's about occupancy. It doesn't matter where you vote or where you pay taxes. The law is clear. You have to have LIVED in the city for the last year. He's not being penalized by taking a position with the president. He voluntarily stepped down from his white house position. He made a choice and now he has to live with it. He should have checked the rules before he quit his job. Lesson learned.

January 25 2011 at 9:24 PM Report abuse +17 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>