Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Julian Assange and Bradley Manning: A Tale of Two Arrests

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
LONDON -- On the face of it, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and Pfc. Bradley Manning have a great deal in common. Both are thought to be guilty of leaking sensitive government information that allegedly jeopardizes U.S. national security. Both are currently in custody. And both can boast the support of renegade filmmaker Michael Moore. But there the similarities end.

Assange's "prison" is a lush, 600-acre estate north of London that boasts a housekeeper, a carp lake and a fully-stocked wine cellar. (Check out these Christmas photos at the Daily Mail.) Sure, Assange is wearing an electronic tagging device and must report daily to the local authorities. But in the month following his arrest in London for extradition to Sweden over allegations of sexual assault, Assange has managed to wrangle both a million-dollar book contract and screen rights to a movie deal.

Meanwhile, Manning -- the young soldier accused of leaking the secret U.S. documents that made WikiLeaks a household name -- has, since July, spent his days locked up at the Quantico Marine Corps Base in Virginia.

Because he has been termed a "maximum security risk,"
Manning is confined to his single-person cell 23 hours per day. He has one hour to exercise, one hour to watch television, and is permitted reading material. But he is shackled at the hands and legs during all visits and denied opportunities to work. Guards also check him every five minutes during the day and Manning is required to respond.

For a few days last week, Manning was placed on "suicide watch," which meant he was confined to his cell 24 hours a day, stripped of all clothing except for underwear, and deprived of his reading glasses. This, despite the fact that three psychiatrists have examined him since August and all say Manning is not a suicide risk. At the urging of U.S. Army lawyers, the suicide watch was lifted.

Earlier this week, NBC News reported that the U.S. government has been unable to find evidence directly linking Manning to Assange. Among other things, this would weaken the chances of extraditing and prosecuting Assange on espionage charges. (Assange will fight his extradition to Sweden on sex charges at a hearing in London on Feb. 7.)

As for Manning, he awaits trial on charges that could put him in prison for 52 years, according to the Army.

Meanwhile, his lawyer, David Coombs, has filed a complaint that Manning is being unfairly treated at Quantico, and requested that Manning no longer be deemed a maximum security risk. Amnesty International has also written to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, asking that Manning's restrictions be reviewed. In its letter, Amnesty noted that Manning is classified as a "maximum custody" detainee despite having no history of violence or disciplinary offenses while in custody.

Others, like the progressive blog Fire Dog Lake, are likening Manning's treatment to the alleged abuse and torture of other detainees by the U.S. government. On Sunday, Manning's close friend David House -- the only person to visit him in prison in July other than his lawyers -- brought to Quantico a petition signed by 42,000 people protesting the conditions under which his friend is being held. (House was detained by military police for questioning and did not get inside to see Manning.)

Military officials have repeatedly denied that Manning is in any way being tortured or denied due process. But senior military officials did tell NBC News that a U.S. Marine commander violated procedure when he placed Manning on suicide watch last week.

There are, without a doubt, significant differences between these two cases. For starters, Assange has yet to be charged with a crime -- he is merely wanted for questioning. And Manning, because he is a member of the United States Army, must be held in a military brig while he awaits trial.

Still, one can't help but be struck by the parallel universes that these whistleblowers now inhabit. And I'm left wondering: Where's Pfc. Manning's movie deal?


Follow Delia on Twitter.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

2 Comments

Filter by:
jamieo555

julian assange is no different than jared loughner. one killed and maimed a group of innocents and is branded as pure evil and the other destroys and threatens the lives and stability of millions and is deemed a hero activist. he hides behind free speech and open government, but in reality he is an anarchist and a nilhist, bent on destroying western society as we know it. he is a lonely misfit outsider wanting to wreak havoc and exact revenge on the world he sees as having shunned him. i think it says alot about michael moore, that he supports this.

January 27 2011 at 2:13 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
wikileakscrime

What movie deal for the traitor?

There are numerous societies, armies and various groups in this world, Bradley Manning has chosen to be in U.S. military and has submitted to army' rules and laws. He did not choose to be in some other group, he has chosen to commit treason and break the law in the U.S. army, so he shall face the justice of the army and be jailed or left free, all depends of the court and if he was guilty.

Now, Julian Assange, does not take any care at all about Bradley Manning, as Bradley, was just one of his victims. Julian Assange is "hacker", or better word cracker, as he is the one that enjoys making fraud and scam with people like Bradley Manning. Cracker like Assange is proud on his social engineering trick, on tricking out the person in authority to get onto the information.

Only for the sake of public image, Assange is sending Bradley some money.

But the whole theater about Wikileaks is scam for money,

January 27 2011 at 2:05 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>