AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
But no legitimate political conversation is advanced by sexist name calling.Michell thinks we need less Wall Street regulation. Regulation caused all of the Great Recession? She also said something to the effect that the US was blackmailng BP! Then she wanted Minnsotan armed and dangerous after Obama was elected. She also wanted people not to get involved with the census. This woman is not the brightest bulb on the chandalier. He outrageous statments don't get as much play as they should. Pretty is as pretty does and does ain't doing it.
February 01 2011 at 10:42 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyBalloon head is an alliteration for "AIR HEAD" but with that added inference to a cartoon character, ergo an air-headed Blondie who probably dyed her hair that mousy brown to disguise her blondness. Guess what ? IT DIDN'T WORK !
January 27 2011 at 10:12 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyAgreed that Bachmann is a revisionist and needs to get in touch with reality. I disagree with pretty much all of her political positions. The point is this -- so many people resort to name calling when criticizing a woman, but not when it's a man. That's sexism. I don't hear Matthews or anyone else wondering about the male balloon heads, suggesting that the head of the Tea Party reminds him of a make-up salesperson or that any of the men in the Obama administration are "nagging bitches."
January 27 2011 at 8:14 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyIt is not that she is a woman, but she is a conservative woman. Clinton got in obamas way so she was demonized. I am sure you hace read rules for raticals and understand what happened. I agree with Bachmann on her politicial views and disagree with Obama. But I should have a right to express my views with out being demonized and so should Bachmann and you should have the same write to express yours as long as you make it clear your articles take a liberal slant.
January 27 2011 at 12:20 PM Report abuse Permalink -4 rate up rate down Replyobviously, you dont watch matthews....he totally calls out the male balloon heads, just uses different adjectives...but he calls them out....
January 29 2011 at 7:11 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyThis article is Total Rubbish and a classic diversion technique. This has nothing to do with sexism. The woman is an avowed creationist and historical revisionist. Please don't diminish the extent and corrosive power of her ignorance by turning this into a discussion about sexism. Focus on what is important.
January 27 2011 at 6:10 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyHow is "balloon head" sexist? If balloon head is female, what is the male terminology? Plus, she IS a balloon head.
January 26 2011 at 8:24 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down Replyexactly, since when does balloon head exclusively refer to a woman?
January 29 2011 at 7:12 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyNot every political pundit has a rational case to make. Bamberger may be among them.
January 26 2011 at 8:24 PM Report abuse Permalink +7 rate up rate down ReplyEvidently Joanne Bamberger considers baloon head a sexist remark. I wonder if she had any problems with Palin, Angle et al and their 'grow a pair', 'put your man pants on' and 'man up' comments all through the last election?
January 26 2011 at 7:59 PM Report abuse Permalink +17 rate up rate down ReplyWhat is sexist about calling Bachmann a ballon head? Making dumb statements, whether you are a man or women, warrants being a ballon head. So this writer, to me, is making something out of nothing. Unfortunately, Michelle Bachmann has shown time and time again to be a "ballon head" Right on Chris!
January 26 2011 at 7:52 PM Report abuse Permalink +14 rate up rate down ReplyI understand the writer's comments regarding sexism, but as a female, I personally don't want to be judged by the likes of Bachmann and Palin. They are too vain and interested in their own personal agendas and take any and every opportunity to comment when sometimes silence would be golden. When females such as these use winking, lipstick and "cutesy" to further themselves sexism is a moot isssue where they're concerned. They asked for it!
January 26 2011 at 7:31 PM Report abuse Permalink +11 rate up rate down ReplyThank you breezy62253 because their own individual actions exploit themselves and not women such as Hillary Clinton who has the knowledge, skills and abilities to become president. In other words, there's a very big difference between Hillary, Michele and Sarah. The latter two couldn't touch Hillary even if they wanted to.
January 26 2011 at 10:35 PM Report abuse Permalink +7 rate up rate down ReplyWho would want too, she is dumb as a box of rocks. Claiming she had experience in the White House, just because she was married to the president. To use her logic, if she had married a brain surgeon, she should be able to do his job too.
January 27 2011 at 2:54 AM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyMr. Matthews is absolutely correct. Do people like her no anything about American history?...No need to answer, she already answered it. Lol...
January 26 2011 at 7:18 PM Report abuse Permalink +7 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
17 Comments