Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

State of the Union Winners and Losers: How Did Liberals, Corporate America Do?

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Who won and who lost in President Obama's hour-long State of the Union address? It was less of a laundry list than some presidents indulge in, but still there were plenty of signals to interpret and points to put on the board (or not).

WINNERS

Nerds and entrepreneurs. Obama talked repeatedly about how he wants to sink money not just into education, but also into biomedical research, information technology and clean energy technology. "We need to teach our kids that it's not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated, but the winner of the science fair," he said.

Moderates. Obama's many signals to them included calls for simplifying the tax system, lowering the corporate tax rate, ending earmarks and streamlining the government bureaucracy. He also reiterated his support for education reforms controversial with teacher unions, and said that "we want to reward good teachers and stop making excuses for bad ones." He pushed for free-trade agreements all over the world, and urged colleges to welcome ROTC back on campus now that "Don't ask, don't tell" has been repealed.

College students and their parents. Obama asked Congress to make permanent a tuition tax credit for individuals with income up to $80,000 and households up to $160,000. The maximum benefit is $10,000 over four years. The Treasury Department says 9.4 million families with college students will benefit this year.

Business, labor and the construction industry. Obama last fall proposed a $50 billion plan to rebuild infrastructure across the country. He made clear he is still interested in spending money on infrastructure and cited gains in other countries to try to get resistant Republicans on board. "South Korean homes now have greater Internet access than we do. Countries in Europe and Russia invest more in their roads and railways than we do. China is building faster trains and newer airports," he said.

He set goals -- high-speed rail access within 25 years for 80 percent of Americans ("faster than flying -- without the pat-down"), high-speed wireless coverage for 98 percent of all Americans within five years. Among those welcoming the commitment: the American Society of Civil Engineers, the American Road & Transportation Builders Association, the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the AFL-CIO.

Farmers. There was no word in the speech about cutting nearly $5 billion in agricultural subsidies, even though they are classic examples of corporate welfare. That's not to say they won't be on the chopping block in Obama's budget blueprint, due in mid-February.

LOSERS

Liberals. They didn't hear many fighting words or much about their causes. Obama did not say he would work to ease climate change, or close Guantanamo Bay prison, or put new restrictions on guns. He didn't suddenly become a champion of gay marriage. He didn't complain or even joke about Republican obstructionism and, unlike last year, there was no critique of rulings from the majority-conservative Supreme Court.

Oil companies. "I'm asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies. I don't know if you've noticed, but they're doing just fine on their own," Obama said. The remark was greeted pretty much with silence in the House chamber. Jack Gerard, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, later issued a statement saying the U.S. oil and natural gas industry "pays taxes at effective rates far higher than most other industries" and receives tax deductions "similar to those enjoyed by other industries to encourage energy production and new jobs."

The unemployed. The jobless rate has been above 9 percent for more than 20 months, and some 14.5 million people were unemployed last month. Obama briefly mentioned them and their hardships, but this was not a speech suffused with feel-your-pain moments. Nor did he propose a new Works Progress Administration or any other direct federal involvement in making sure people have work.

Serious deficit hawks. Though Obama proposed a five-year freeze on domestic non-security discretionary spending, he mentioned only in the most general terms his own debt commission's work on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and defense spending. That earned him a gentle scolding from Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. "It would have made more sense for the president to have used his commission's report to begin the national discussion on deficit reduction in earnest," she said.

Trial lawyers. Obama said he is willing to look at new ideas to bring down health care costs, "including one that Republicans suggested last year: medical malpractice reform to rein in frivolous lawsuits." That drew a rebuke from Gibson Vance, president of the American Association for Justice. He said up to 98,000 people die every year from preventable medical errors and "countless more" are injured. "President Obama should direct his focus towards tackling this startling figure, not promoting efforts that could eliminate the legal rights of patients," he said.

The wealthy. Though he just signed a two-year extension of Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans as part of a compromise with Republicans, Obama said a country serious about deficit reduction "simply cannot afford" making them permanent. "Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break," he said. "It's not a matter of punishing their success. It's about promoting America's success."

Follow Jill Lawrence on Facebook and Twitter

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

45 Comments

Filter by:
Mekhong Kurt

From the story:

Jack Gerard, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, later issued a statement saying the U.S. oil and natural gas industry "pays taxes at effective rates far higher than most other industries" and receives tax deductions "similar to those enjoyed by other industries to encourage energy production and new jobs."

If it were possible to graduate from a single course magna cum laude, Mr. Gerard undoubtedly would have done so -- in Doublespeak.

January 27 2011 at 8:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
oldengineera2

During a 46 year career, corporate America paid my salary, assisted in my continuing education, provided health and dental care for me and my family, helped me save for retirement, and aided in stock investments in the company. Liberals did zero for me. For whom should I be rooting?

January 26 2011 at 9:40 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to oldengineera2's comment
Mekhong Kurt

There obviously were some powerful liberal prossives in your company. Having dental care alone is a strong indciator of that.

Just as I believe liberals ought not dismiss conservatives out of hand, neither should conservatives out not reject liberals simply as a matter of personal preference.

January 27 2011 at 9:02 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
MARTHARUBYT

mrtr
We must encourage civil and respect dialogues among any human being, and if you do not know how then start the search now!!

Many prominent politicians as JBoehner, spender of taxpayer money for whom the notion or idea of small government is just something to say in front of the camaras, or when the public money in question might go to poor people or immigrants or others. At this time Republicans will or must choose between raising the debt to heaven or just shutting down the governments! think hard! mrtr

January 26 2011 at 7:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Al P.

Special Interests run this country. Look at the billions going to the oil companies. This has been going on since the Bush days when he decided the enrich his friends. Some complain about Obama, but what president can you point to that has done so much for the middle class. All the Party of NO does is support special interests, just look at their voting record the facts don't lie. All the Party of NO does is complain about the spending and deficit, they think we forgot who got us into this problem in the first place. They never say what would have happened to this country if Obama didn't spend all this money. They just want to forget about those FACTS !

January 26 2011 at 6:04 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
bltcarbiz

Oh the good old finger pointing and name calling is back. Did anyone REALLY believed that it would calm down??

January 26 2011 at 4:45 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Brian Andrew Priest

Where exactly do liberals start and corporate America end? They are tethered together, joined at the hip.Crony capitalism is the cause of this incestuous alliance.With so much regulation and subsidies running amuck do we even have a true free market anymore?
The whole state of the union address has become so scripted and phony.We the people know what the state of the union is far more than the insulated beltway crowd.It takes a lot of sugar cane to coat this economy.You can put a tuxedo on a turd and say its James Bond but people know better.

January 26 2011 at 4:16 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
tistolaugh

The losers are always the same, we the American people whose backs always carry the burden of any incompetence by the president and Congress.

January 26 2011 at 4:08 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
Tom

libs must be upset...on minute he is so far left saul alinsky would have been ashamed...next minute he is almost center....next state of the union he will be in the gop...we hope

January 26 2011 at 3:55 PM Report abuse -8 rate up rate down Reply
vobox3343

That line about not punishing the wealthy for their successes but promoting American success was brilliant. That's why Barack Obama is our President.

January 26 2011 at 2:33 PM Report abuse +12 rate up rate down Reply
donnellyddo

Winners and loosers from a speech? What? We are all the loosers from this speech. Another fine campaign speech and you actually assign winners and loosers?

January 26 2011 at 12:51 PM Report abuse -11 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to donnellyddo's comment
Charlie

You know, I actually feel looser after listening to the speech. I'm cool, I'm calm, I could dance... I'm much looser.

(Psst: Loser, one who loses, has one o. You just said that we're all more relaxed, "looser," as in the verb, "to loosen.")

January 26 2011 at 3:16 PM Report abuse +18 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>