AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
- The Federal Reserve for a "pivotal failure to stem the flow of toxic mortgages, which it could have done by setting prudent mortgage-lending standards." It particular, it cited former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and others, who for decades championed deregulation and self-regulation of financial institutions.And you forgot to mention that all these agencies were under the Bush Administration and every thing happened under his watch before Obama ever became President. And I didn't hear any mention of the 2 wars and the Bush Tax cuts. Also, although the economy is starting to come back, the long term effects of the housing bubble and the unemployment are still being felt to this day and will take even longer to get back to what it was. Bush really did a number on us!
January 31 2011 at 3:05 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyThe underpinnings of the recession started during the Clinton presidency, or even possibly earlier. It wasn't Bush that started easing intrest rates and began loosening credit requirements. It was Billy Boy the hero to so many of you Bush haters. I still remember hearing about those high flying stocks Lowe's and Home Depot during Clinton's era. The policies that were put in place then were the same one's that failed in the 2008. Some people don't deserve a mortgage, or a credit card. There are only so many people that should be buying houses and the first requirement should be, are you ready for this... Can you pay for it? The reason we got into this mess is because we all forgot that when we want something we need to have a way to pay for it. The govt. allowed us to forget that and even helped us to forget it by making it easier to get the things we don't need/ can't afford. This made us happier, and therefore we thought that the govt. was doing a good job. We looked like we had a healthy economy. The banks, and lending institutions were more than happy to go along too. To quote Gordon Gecko "Greed is good". Every one of those transactions generated fees for them. So.. the "great recession" is as much our own fault as a culture as it is any one particular group, or individuals fault save the SEC or our govt. whose job it is to save us from at times ourselves.
February 03 2011 at 1:18 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyjandtstarr, this in reply to you and those who are in agreement with your line of thinking.
You are either young and uninformed, you are either blinded by your political leanings, you have not been paying attention to your govt for the last 30 years or you just hate Bush.
The problems that created the financial crisis have it's foundation in the policies of the 1980's. They started under Carter and they have progressed all the way through with backings of both parties in Congress and Presidents of both parties. Clinton expanded it and Bush meekly tried to reign it in and barney Frank and the Dems who controlled the Congress the last two years of his administration stopped him.
The idea was one of good intentions, if you expand home ownership, you expand upward mobility and therefore wealth. The problem is that this was a faulty assumption. You can not excuse Human Nature.
Those who wanted a house but did not have to put any money down were going to take the biggest loan they could. Lenders under mandates of the federal Govt to lend to poorer people were going to try to find a way to make those loans and to make the biggest profit. Greed all the way around.
Greed of the Political classes looking to solidify their voting blocks as the party that made it possible for you to own that house.
Greed on the part of the lenders who divised ways to squeeze out every dime of profit by selling the most loans they could under the guise of the mandates set up by the politicians looking for those voters.
And Greed of the People who took out loans which they knew or should have known that they could never pay back.
This is a Govt that has been out of control for decades, Not doing what is good for the Nation, but doing what will get the most votes and money from those special interest groups and voting blocks.
It enticed the most base of human emotion and took advantage of them, Hope, Want and Need.
Government will provide and look at us we're the party that gave it to you!
Look Where We Are Now!
Deficits that threaten the futures of our children and their children.
Cuts everywhere and those that we're given so much will now find that losing that house that they we're put into by the Almighty Giving Govt is now going to be the least of things that they lose.
There is a reason that President Kennedy told us "ASK NOT WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU" too bad his name still brings twangs of affection but those words were forgotten.
The FOX detractors never give their sources for news! They just challenge the intellect of FOX viewers!
Would be nice to know where they get their info!!
NBC nightly= on QE2, they thrilled that the stock market was up! NO MENTION of the effect that QE2 would have on commidity prices=food,fuel etc. But they had time for "Making a Difference"!
NBC Nightly =on the meltdown report= Picture of Angelides, Failed to mention BIG time DEM from CA.,one time StateTreasurer! Mentioned that there was a minority report! BUT had time for " Making a Difference"!
Read the minority report,and how Fannie was carrying Sub-Prime loans as regular loans on their books! So the majority report says =Cra and sub-prime were not the main problem!!
If Fannie is carrying Sub-Prime loans as regular loans and the majority report does not mention this,How can the know the true cause and effect of the CRA and the Sub-Prime loans?
Did noit see mention of the Andrew Cuomo,Clinton HUD secretary or Franklin Raines the book cooker at Fannie! Cuomo had filed and threatened lawsuits against lenders that DID NOT LEND TO WHO THE ADMINSTRATION thought they should lend to! He can be found stating that the policy of lending to the previously NON-QUALIFIED,would lead to losses, But it would be worth it!
Obama added to the melt down with his stimulus plan and creating economic insecurity. He should have been working on our economy for our unemployed. NO, he spent all that time running all over the country and world on air force1 making speeches and campaigning.
January 28 2011 at 4:48 AM Report abuse Permalink -10 rate up rate down Replythe first 700 billion stimulus was not obama's but bssh's with his treasury sec doling out the money not to buy toxic mortgages as was planned but to help the bootom line of wall street
January 28 2011 at 6:27 PM Report abuse Permalink +15 rate up rate down ReplyThe Republicans always wamted to get of regulation, They feel regulations hamper the prosuit of making money, regardless if the regulations were intended to protect them from their own folly. This crap about cutting government spending is nothing but a lot of bull. They better wake up to the fact the Republican era is now coming to an end.
January 28 2011 at 3:43 AM Report abuse Permalink +12 rate up rate down ReplyActually it was the Republicans who pushed for reform. Both McCain and Bush introduced bills to provide more oversight to Fannie and Freddie predicting the housing disaster if they didn't. Both times it was voted down by a party line vote from the dems. Don't you remember Barney Frank standing there proclaiming there was nothing wrong?
January 28 2011 at 8:50 AM Report abuse Permalink -7 rate up rate down ReplyHas anyone ever heard of the Federal Financial Modernization Act of 1999? - look it up it really tells a lot.
February 03 2011 at 12:04 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyThe problem is that both Parties are in a constant battle to win over the "swing" votes which are usually held by the entitlement class. These people have to be rewared for their vote by such things as giving them assistance to buy homes that they cannot afford. All you have to do is to realize that when the entitlement class holds the key to our elections this country is in serious trouble.
January 28 2011 at 12:26 AM Report abuse Permalink -9 rate up rate down ReplyA repost to correct an error.
We had warnings in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Two events in particular: 1. The savings and loan scandal at link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savings_and_loan_crisis and 2. The Whitewater scandal at link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy Laws were supposed to be in place to prevent these. Once again I ask the question: Who is going to write me a check for the $500,000 (of real, good faith money) that I lost or that evaporated due to no fault of my own?
We had warnings in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Two events in particular: 1. The savings and loan scandal at link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savings_and_loan_crisis and 2. The Whitewater scandal at link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savings_and_loan_crisis Laws were supposed to be in place to prevent these. Once again I ask the question: Who is going to write me a check for the $500,000 (of real, good faith money) that I loss or that evaporated due to no fault of my own?
January 27 2011 at 10:45 PM Report abuse Permalink -12 rate up rate down ReplyWhoops link #2 should have been http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy
January 27 2011 at 11:05 PM Report abuse Permalink -11 rate up rate down ReplyIf you really want to find out when the financial crisis could have been avoided google "Brooksley Born". She was a Clinton appointee who tried to bring to light the problems with derivatives in 1996 and 1998 (when the U.S. came within 2-3 days of having the financial crisis then. She was re-buffed by the Repub congressional hearing commitees and Greenspan and Summers. In 1998 the Fed dumped in $250 bil. The result of hearings were "move along folks, there's nothing here". BOTH parties have screwed us. I think we need a large gallows erected in D.C.
January 27 2011 at 10:26 PM Report abuse Permalink +15 rate up rate down ReplyI blame the financial crisis on the federal government's failure to control the size of US corporations. The crisis wasn't caused by the small and medium size financial companys, but by the gigantic financial companys. The giant companys knew the government couldn't afford to let them fail, because they are too big, so they took unreasonable risks knowing that if things went well they would profit and if things went badly, the government would be forced to bail them out to avoid a total collapse of the economy. Giant companys don't have enough competition to make them operate efficiently and their executive compensation gets out of control. I also blame companys that are too big for the cost of health care growing faster than the cost of living.
January 27 2011 at 9:49 PM Report abuse Permalink +17 rate up rate down ReplyI agree. These mega companies are gobbling up all the small companies at an alarming rate. What ever happened to the good old rules about monopolies? There was a very good reason for the monopoly polices. We need to force the government to protect us from this monstrous deception and make these greedy companies pay every last penny back!
January 27 2011 at 10:00 PM Report abuse Permalink +17 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
101 Comments