AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Over the weekend, President Obama telephoned the leaders of Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom to reiterate "his focus on opposing violence and calling for restraint; supporting universal rights, including the right to peaceful assembly, association and speech; and supporting an orderly transition to a government that is responsive to the aspirations of the Egyptian people," the White House said in a statement.The real difference between the Eastern block and egypt is HISTORY. The eastern block was always an abberation caused by WWII. Before that these coutries were part of Europe and democracies or monarhies but certainly going back 400-500 years. (Think austro-hungarian empire etc, etc. After the Berlin wall came down Eastern Europe had 500 years of 'western' tradition behind it and carried on from where it was 50 years before.
Lets get real, the past [500 years] of history of Egypt reflects none of this and it ain't gonna go that way either.
How the marginally-educated Egyptian masses will be able to govern themselves democratically when communications are cut off by the government is problematic. Why is it the Obama administration wants to gain control of an internet "kill switch" in defiance of our first amendment rights to a free flow of information? I for one am scandalized by the suggestion this might even be under consideration.
January 31 2011 at 7:48 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhile I agree with a great dealm of what has already been said, we are (the US) of continuing the sins of our past foreign policy errors. We forget that the Shah of Iran (like Mubarak) was one of the most brutak rulers in the Middle East. Mubarak is not any better,and has been supported in a similiar fashion as the Shah. This is another damned if we don't damned if we do scenario. I believe the military would not support an ultra extremist regime,however, the potential for unrest is great because the amount of time the people have been oppressed, and the rampant poverty in this country. The danger exists that other countries (particularly Israel) might feel compelled to act to support the status quo. As usual what appears to be simple on the surface is complicated by the history both internally, and externally involving this country.
January 31 2011 at 5:30 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down Replyand what "for life" leader will they "elect"?
January 31 2011 at 4:25 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyElBaradei is supported by the fanatical Muslim Brotherhood: what better reason to listen to NOTHING the man says?
January 31 2011 at 4:09 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyThis guy better go back and work for the U.N. This is NEVER going to be a democracy What it will be is a muslim state run by Iran
January 31 2011 at 4:08 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyMoslem Brotherhood in control of Egypt? Scary, Scary.
Will the military intefere? Stay tuned.
Is Baradei a good go, or a no. Does anyone know at this point? One thing we do know, the Egyptian majority want Murbarak out, and the US has to help find a replacement that will not allow the "brotherhood" to gain a stronghold. Of course, whatever we do, it will have to be on the down-low.
January 31 2011 at 3:55 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyrrboyle: I just have to disagree, with this observation: The Egyptian military, which is the largest, most organized and powerful in the entire Middle East, is NOT "fundamentalist Islamic" oriented. It has always been closely allied to the West, and especially to the USA (from which is gets over a $1 billion a year). In any "final confrontation" with a threatened "takeover" by the Muslim Brotherhood (or any other "extremist" group), it will simply move to crush it. The Egyptian military structure is, IMO, the BEST hope for a "smooth transition" from Mubarak to a stable future for Egypt.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you know rrboyle, you have a good point here; I like this concept because it can be done. The military is their best defense.
This is a never ending situation that we seem to get ourselves into. When other countries get into a mess, why are we the first to go bail them out? Now if that were us, how many other countries would come to our rescue? Think about it. And those people that chose to go live in those countries that have no stablity, they should not depend on the rest of us to get them out. It's think before you do here people!!!!
January 31 2011 at 2:44 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down Replylatinlace, we haven't made a move yet; but if the brotherhood takes root and power you can bet your bottom that not just our government will act covertly but I fear, others will also. Obama's aware and consensus seems to be: working to help the Iraqi's and afghani people rebuild and re-educate. If we can re-educate and help them they in turn (I HOPE!) will back us when needed... but we need to make sure that they can sustain their own governments and not collapse agin.
January 31 2011 at 3:06 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
67 Comments