Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

'Forcible Rape?' Republicans Take Puzzling Language Out of Abortion Bill

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
House Republicans have dropped language from an anti-abortion bill that critics said sounded like an attempt to redefine rape.

The offensive phrase, "forcible rape," was used in legislation seeking to permanently ban use of taxpayer funds to pay for abortions. It allows exceptions for pregnancies caused by incest or when the life of the pregnant woman is endangered. The original language also permitted an abortion exception for cases of "forcible rape," which angered women's groups who thought the term suggested some rapes were not forced.

The bill was quickly amended to cover all cases of rape, so as not to suggest that some types of sexual assaults -- statutory rape of someone underage, for instance -- were not covered.

A spokesman for chief sponsor Rep. Christopher Smith (R-N.J.) told the Washington Post the dropped language had been "misconstrued."

The bill, called the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, would simply write the "Hyde Amendment" -- an existing year-to-year ban on use of government money to pay for abortions -- into permanent law. That way, the prohibition would not need repeated reauthorization by Congress.

Folo Tom Diemer on Twitter http://twitter.com/tomdiemer

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

77 Comments

Filter by:
sfamilyent

For all you pro-lifers out there - are you willing to pay to feed, cloth, shelter, educate and provide medical care to all of the pregnant women and unwanted children? I've heard many pro-life conservatives complain about having their tax dollars go to provide sustenance for those with low or no income; and, while opposed to terminating an unwanted pregnancy, they are willing to allow children to be born into situations where they will experience poverty, be neglected and are likely to suffer from physical and mental abuse; and they are willing to pay to take care of the pregnant women. Frankly, I think it is more cruel and immoral to allow a birth into a situation where there are insufficient resources to provide for the necessary care and to force a woman to carry a fetus to full term, than it is to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. And, rather than address the cost to society that unwanted pregnancies and births impose and make rational decisions regarding the welfare of those involved and the welfare of citizens in general, our elected officials are willing to forgo the use of taxpayer dollars to terminate unwanted pregnancies and to impose the resulting burden upon all of us - with or without our consent...

February 05 2011 at 8:46 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
3 replies to sfamilyent's comment
Maureen

So where is the job creation and balanced budget the Tea Party Reps promised to work on?

February 05 2011 at 4:31 AM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
bassettgl

An abortion is a medical procedure between the woman (and husband, if married) and her doctor. No government, church, or other waco has any right to stick their nose in.

February 05 2011 at 12:20 AM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to bassettgl's comment
LuAnn

You left out one person - the baby. I agree that the government has no place in that decision; to a person with faith, they do involve the church to help them make that difficult choice. That choice should only be available in cases of incest, rape or to save the life of the mother. In my own opinion, any time a woman "chooses" to kill her unborn child, it should be combined with sterilization so as to prevent her from killing again. I would be interested in hearing your opinion on late-term abortion. In "aborting" a baby that would be viable outside the womb, if it were done a month later (after the birth) it would be termed murder. That is exactly what these morally berift "doctors" do when they remove a living child and cut its spinal cord to kill it.

February 05 2011 at 10:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dc walker

""""forcible""rape is redundant; all rapes are forced.

February 04 2011 at 11:11 PM Report abuse +11 rate up rate down Reply
Tami

The GOP really needs to start tackling the problems that currently exist, abortion, is not one of them. The GOP is wasting our money trying to hack down laws that have been enforced for years, rather then dealing with today's issues, such as, jobs/unemployment,economy, something they promised would be top priority.Yet,they still havent addressed or offered ideas on how to improve any of those things. And then, their favorite past time, to hack down healthcare laws that millions of Americans really need, we are finally on a path to somewhere and now they are wasting time addressing two issues, abortion and healthcare repeal. What year are they living in? They have NO clue as to what the people want or need,nor do they care.

February 04 2011 at 10:27 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
Walking man

Infant death caused by lack of health care is a longer, more painful, and infinitely more cruel form of abortion.

February 04 2011 at 9:37 PM Report abuse +14 rate up rate down Reply
collinfdnb

Abortion is intrisicly evil. Let's see how many progressives vote against this bill.

February 04 2011 at 9:33 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
5 replies to collinfdnb's comment
Wease

i think that if they want to rule out abortions paid for by taxpayer funds they also need to rule out sexual enhancement drugs like viagra.

February 04 2011 at 9:30 PM Report abuse +20 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Wease's comment
vdhh

Touche! How about federally funded sterilization and birth control as a remedy?

February 04 2011 at 9:42 PM Report abuse +13 rate up rate down Reply
coastie929

Talk about hypersensitivity! Do we really live in a society that gets "Puzzled" so easily? I'm no genius, but when I read the term "Forcible Rape" it sounded pretty self explanatory the same as just saying rape. In no way did my stupid little brain did I think, "OMG! I didn't realize that not all rape was forced, I have now been instructed by the evil Republicans that you can have rape that is consensually peaceful and in no way forced mentally or physically". I guess I'm not some mindless progressive American who takes everything so literal that I cannot for one second think out side of the box to come up with a reasonable and common sense driven conclusion about what the term "Forcible Rape" meant. What a ridiculous and un-news worthy article. Those in congress who think that such a debate was the best use of time and tax payer dollars should be ashamed of themselves.

February 04 2011 at 9:05 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
5 replies to coastie929's comment
jelink

"Forcible rape" has long been a common legal term. Here's an example: "Forcible rape, as defined in the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, is the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. Attempts or assaults to commit rape by force or threat of force are also included; however, statutory rape (without force) and other sex offenses are excluded."

Sorry, no GOP machinations at work. Move along, nothing to see here..............

February 04 2011 at 9:02 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jelink's comment
Linda K

Who decides what constitutes "forcible"? My now 25 year old daughter with mental retardation was raped by a neighbor. She apparently didn't resist. She was determined to be incapable of consenting. Is this force or not? My guess is that different judges would come up with different answers, based on their own definition of "forcible."

February 04 2011 at 11:22 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners