Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Where Are All the GOP 2012 Candidates? Blame Sarah Palin

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The politerati are all a-flutter. Why are there no GOP presidential candidates yet? There sure are plenty -- it seems like dozens -- of 2012 wannabes. But so far not one of the conventional possible contenders (probable or improbable) have officially tossed a hat (or checkbook) into the ring.

By this point in the 2008 campaign, much of the Democratic and Republican field was in place -- or close to it. John Edwards (remember him?) announced his run for the presidency on Dec. 26, 2006, at an event with kids in flood-ravaged New Orleans. Hillary Rodham Clinton lifted off with a Web video posted on Jan. 20, 2007 (two years prior to the next inauguration day). Barack Obama began his campaign with a speech in frosty Springfield, Illinois, on Feb. 10. On the GOP side, Mike Huckabee took the plunge on "Meet the Press" on Jan. 28, 2007. Mitt Romney started his engine with an announcement in Michigan on Feb. 13. John McCain, who had been running since he lost to George W. Bush in the 2000 Republican primaries, informally gave the thumbs-up on David Letterman's show on Feb. 28, 2007.

This week, Romney appeared on "Letterman" and tried to hide his hand, claiming he had "no plans for" another presidential bid "at this point." Oh, the things politicians say. Of course, he has plans. In fact, he has an assortment of political action committees cooking up these plans and spreading contributions about to set up his presidential bid. Romney has signaled no ambivalence about wanting to become the CEO of the USA.

So why the slow (official) start-up for him and the others? I think I know who to blame: Sarah Palin.

She's the 800-pound grizzly. If she enters the race -- and don't ask me to wager one way or another on whether she will -- she will become the gravitational center of the contest. It's impossible to game anything out without knowing if she's a candidate. And with her appeal to grassroots social conservatives, who dominate two of the three early primaries, she probably can get away with not joining the race until late in the process. (In fact, it might be to her advantage to sit out the initial debates and then proclaim, "I haven't heard anyone say what's needing to be said, so, heck, guess I gotta run for this thing myself.")

With a field that could well include 10 or more candidates, any designated front-runner will also be the designated pinata -- attacked from all directions. Why would Romney want to be in that position any longer than necessary -- especially while Palin ducks such attacks, racking up speaking fees, pontificating on Fox News, issuing Facebook proclamations, and having the media hang on every tweet she dispatches? He's better off playing it coy, while raising mucho bucks and putting an operation into place. Besides, with Obama on a decent roll these days, does Romney want to have to address every White House move? An official, front-running candidate would be expected to do so. As a not-yet-official aspirant, he can decide when to poke at the president and when not to.

Huckabee has a similar problem. In a Palinated presidential contest, he and the former half-term Alaska governor would be competing for the same social conservatives. Huckabee won many of these primary voters in 2008. But the slogging will be tougher if he's up against the Queen of the Tea Party. His chances are far more affected by the P-factor than those of the other possible candidates.

And Huckabee has to worry about cash flow. Not his campaign's -- his own. In December, the Arkansas Times reported that he and his wife are building a $3 million home in a Florida beach development, with a $2.5 million mortgage. With such a financial burden, he probably doesn't want to give up his day job as a Fox News personality. Not too soon, at least.

Other possible GOP candidates are probably waiting to announce because they're not going to announce. But the longer they don't announce, the more publicity they will receive. Put Rep. Michele Bachmann and former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton in this category. Newt Gingrich might also be a presidential teaser who's just after the attention. Former advisers to Gingrich tell me that they think he's actually going to jump in. But can a fellow who dumped not one but two wives when they were ill truly win the nomination of the purported party of family values? (Richard Land, a prominent religious right leader, put it this way: "Two ex-wives is one ex-wife too many for most evangelicals.")

As for some of the others -- Mitch Daniels, John Thune, Haley Barbour, Rick Santorum -- it's hard to figure out what's taking so long. (Jon Huntsman just resigned as U.S. ambassador to China to enter the presidential guessing game, but can a GOPer who spent two years working for Obama and who has supported civil unions for gays and lesbians and cap-and-trade climate legislation be a credible candidate in a tea partied GOP?) And there's Tim Pawlenty, the former governor of Minnesota -- he seems serious about a run, but with his low name recognition, he should have announced last summer. Any of these folks feeling cold in the feet?

Finally, why is Palin, who has turned her entire life into a reality show that earns millions, taking so long to decide? To ask the question that way is to answer it. But maybe it's also because she realizes that when it comes to the GOP presidential bus, she can sit anywhere she wants to.

You can follow David Corn's postings and media appearances via Twitter.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

20 Comments

Filter by:
CherMoeLin

Sarah might "run" but she can't hide. And since she thinks everyone else is stupid or out to get her, she'll never be able to find any "handlers" who can make her look good or smart enough to handle a presidency.

February 18 2011 at 12:53 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
tpatl5

I don't spend a lot of time on left wing web sites, but happened on this one by accident and, inevitable snark aside, David Corn has it about right. What he may not know is that, implicitly, he's proclaiming Palin the shrewdest and smartest politician out there. Not only is she getting paid to run for President, but is effectively locking out all other contenders while she goes about her business doing only what she wants to do, ignoring the rest of the political world, except when she wants to rock the politicos from her Blackberry! You couldn't make this up, no one would believe the scenario.

February 13 2011 at 7:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to tpatl5's comment
harjacobhar

I sure hope Sarah Palin wins the repub nomination..... OBAMA 2012

March 01 2011 at 6:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ericccclark

Not sure what all the worry is about Sarah. As before, give her enough rope and she'll hang herself. Hey, I can see Australia from here right next to Russia LOL! But seriously, as a Republican for nearly 40 years, it would be a very sad moment for someone like me to switch sides but really now, Sarah for President? Surely we can do better because I don't think we can do much worse. Please fellow Republicans, lets get real and get a worthwhile candidate.

February 10 2011 at 1:03 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
AL

Just to try and balance the rhetoric from the left by suggesting the leftist "progressives" lining up to challenge Obama in the socialist convention in N.C. let me suggest a few. Geo Soros will probably make it to the first ballot Ariana Huffington will probably toss her hat in the ring at the urging of Rev Wright and Hillary will sit in the front of the bus with Bill sitting just behind her urging her to name him her running mate. The platform will probably be revised to eliminate all of the constitution except the commerce clause which comes in handy to force the citizens to eat broccoli, and other disgusting things.

February 06 2011 at 11:27 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
tistolaugh

Maybe both sides got the message that America is sick and tired of the endless campaigning and will wait until a year out to besiege us with all the phony promises and pandering this time. One can hope anyway.

February 05 2011 at 5:57 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
jjjohnblack570

lol vminch007 You think that just because I am not naive and gullible like you and don't support Sarah Palin I am bitter? If that's your idea of bitter then you are my idea of a fool. Why would I want to support anybody as ridiculous and clueless as this woman? joe the only people you speak for art ill informed tea party people like you. You certainly don't speak for real America. And sysphaus71 you say I poseess the liberal thought process? Thank you for saying that liberals think. I just wish I could say the same for you. All you ever seem to do is follow misleading talking points because you don't have a brain to think with.

February 05 2011 at 5:42 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
AL

Guess the media has exhausted the trash bin on sarah and getting antsy on who to dig up dirt on to entertain the George Soros machine. The only way the left could win in 2012 is to promote another McCain. So I urge all conservatives to support the one that the main media is scrambling to trash and you will have a winner.

February 05 2011 at 2:36 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to AL's comment
lillyluminatus

AL, this progressive couldn't agree more. RUN, SARAH, RUN!!!!!! We are BEGGING you!

February 05 2011 at 2:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
harjacobhar

obama 2012

March 01 2011 at 6:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
joe

Where are all the GOP candidates for 2012? I would guess that they are being held secret so that the mainstream media will have less time to trash them before the elections. Sarah is working well as a decoy and the media is frothing at the mouth over Sarah which proves my point.

February 04 2011 at 7:01 PM Report abuse -8 rate up rate down Reply
wendy013

I think possible Republican contenders are much more interested in Obama and the economy than in Sarah Palin. It's tough to beat a sitting president. Why waste the time unless you have a good chance of winning?

February 04 2011 at 5:24 PM Report abuse +29 rate up rate down Reply
Rogell

The last sentence in the last paragraph of David Corn's article, is inaccurate. He seems to suggest that Sarah Palin can sit anywhere she chooses on the GOP presidential bus. Given her inability to effectively articulate any substantive topic would be her achiles heel. Again, taking a page from Peggy Noonan's assessment, "Sarah Palin doesn't demonstrate the tools, the equipment, the knowledge, or the philosophical grounding one hopes for, and expects, in a holder of high office." Thus, Sarah Palin, in my view, has no standing on where she might sit on the GOP presidential bus. Instead, she'll sit wherever the front runner will want her to sit, if at all. She's by far from being a contending heavyweight, but instead a wannabe much like Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, another wannabe with no standing. An attorney who lacks very little understanding of historical events. Being an attorney, the U.S. Constitution should be her bible, so-called, and yet she lacks familiarity with it too...

February 04 2011 at 5:12 PM Report abuse +19 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>