Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Ronald Reagan Centennial

Palin Says U.S. Not in Step With Reagan Values, but Is She in His Mold?

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Sarah Palin, warning that America is on a course to economic "ruin," was received warmly Friday night in a speech in honor of the Reagan Centennial in Santa Barbara. But many conservatives continue to see her as a flawed messenger of the modern meaning of Reaganism.

Those doubters don't appear to include Palin herself. Although she lauded Ronald Reagan as "one of a kind" in her keynote, she also sprinkled the 30-minute talk with hints that, if there is indeed another Republican close to the Reagan mold, that individual might be walking among us in the form of a certain ex-governor of Alaska.

Palin told of asking former Reagan aides for tips about his leadership style, and of riding horses at the Reagan ranch Friday where "you could distinctly feel his spirit." Describing herself as a "western conservative in the spirit of Ronald Reagan," she also implored Americans to "reconnect" with the Reaganesque principles of limited government.

"Those values will lead us back to prosperity," she said, adding that they stand in sharp contrast to Washington's recent big-spending ways. "This is not the road to national greatness, it is the road to national ruin," she said. "American Exceptionalism is not exceptionally big government."

Many eyebrows were raised when it was announced a week ago that Palin had been designated as the keynote speaker for the weekend's festivities at the Reagan Ranch Center's celebration of Ronald Reagan's 100th birthday on Feb. 6. But this was not the "official" celebration organized by the Reagan Library.

Instead, Palin was speaking at a two-day event organized by the Reagan Ranch Foundation, an arm of a conservative organization named Young America's Foundation. The YAF began as an off-shoot of a group of college Republicans who formed at Vanderbilt University in the late 1960s. Their connection to Reagan? They raised the money to purchase and preserve Rancho del Cielo, the ranch in the sky in the mountains above Santa Barbara where Reagan spent nearly a year of his two-term presidency.

But even if the Reagan Ranch Foundation has established its conservative chops by saving the Reagan spread, many Americans -- including many original Reaganauts -- believe that Sarah Palin is about as far from The Gipper as one can get. Nonsense, reply Palin's defenders: she hails from a generation of Americans inspired to the cause of conservatism by Reagan, and her choice is wholly appropriate.

Former Reagan speechwriter Ken Khachigian was one of those who defended the choice of Palin, telling reporters this week that she was a teenager when Reagan became the 40th president of the United States, and was among a generation of young Americans who, as they came of age, found that their "lives and philosophy and political fortunes were shaped by the Reagan era." Khachigian added: "She can reflect on that as well as anyone could."

In the other camp was one former Reagan White House aide who told Politics Daily privately that Palin had neither Reagan's style nor depth -- and that she most certainly lacked his experience. "Reagan was governor of the most populous state in the union for eight years," this Reaganite said. "Palin was governor of one of the least populous states in the union -- and she resigned halfway through her first term."

This former Reagan advisor said he wasn't even sure Palin would be a Reagan supporter today. "He might be too pragmatic," the aide said. "He'd be seen by many of today's conservative Republicans as a moderate, a compromiser."

Stylistically, Palin differs from Reagan, too. Self-deprecating humor, Reagan's stock-in-trade, doesn't seem to come naturally to her -- and the Friday night speech had little of anything resembling Reagan's wit. Her rhetorical hyperbole is not Reaganesque, either. At the Reagan Ranch, she suggested that the Obama administration's skittishness about off-shore oil drilling is not only "dangerous," but "insane" -- a word President Reagan reserved for events such as the suicide attack on the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon. Moreover, Reagan would never have employed a crude and jargony phrase such as "WTF moments," which Palin did last week.

On the other hand, Reagan surely would have liked that line about American Exceptionalism not equating to exceptionally high federal spending. He also might have appreciated -- and secretly agreed with -- something Palin mentioned about him on Friday night:

"Today there (are) a lot of people looking around for the next Ronald Reagan, but he was one of a kind and you are not going to find his kind again," Palin said. "And the Gipper wouldn't want us to spend our time on that anyway."




Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

338 Comments

Filter by:
coreydietjournal

Remember something: In times of struggle and uncertainty, it is easy for a political figure to say, "Remember when" etc. Nothing about the Reagan administration has to do with today.

Miss Palin gets by for one reason: Same as Ann COulter and the new one on the block: Michelle Bachmann in Minnesota.

The GOP traditionally are "old white hairs" with generally conservative ideals. These three tall, very attractive women feel like since they articulate well and have exceptional educations, can influence Americans and spill little factoids to impress the average American on TV.

They get by because they are attractive women, period!

They have no solutions for problems like most. Here is the thing: Anyone can complain about how "the old days" were better and blah blah.

Here is my war cry: Either have a potential solution to our problems as a nation, namely Chinese trade leverage, Russia borrowing money on Monday and denouncing us geo-politically on Tuesday and a handful of middle-eastern nations bleeding the U.S. economically in a war they do not need to win, but rather just have to NOT LOSE.

Palin needs to either correct a problem or go clean my kitchen floor. Because bringing up facts about the 80's...unimpresses me.
Telly Savalas Blog www.myopera.com/mopery

February 26 2011 at 10:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
coreydietjournal

I get a kick out of Glenn Beck, but Michelle Bachmann from Minnesota has announced she is running for president.

What a dumb broad she is. Two words for her: Cleaning service. She should open a one and call it a day. All she talks about are tax bills and scares people to death...or aims to anyway. Discussing taxes and "fiscal discipline", Bachmann makes the simple complicated:


Palin is no better. She is one of a handful of conservative hard-line Republican women who have something which makes them stand out amongst the typical blue haired Republicans: She is physically attractive.

She, Coulter and now Bachmann think they can command attention and influence others because they articulate little factoids well and are attractive.

CLEANING SERVICES for all of them.
Here is the rest of my post before any readers assume I am a sexist or slanging false accusations.

http://my.opera.com/mopery/blog/2011/02/24/i-get-a-kick-out-of-glenn-beck-but

Telly Savalas Blog

February 26 2011 at 10:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
fpfp040408

why does Palin think the USA lost the space race & why does she think it was sputnik that led to the downfall of the USSR.

February 07 2011 at 7:12 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
outsev

sarah palin and ronald reagan in the same breath....no way he would embrace her or her followers......she is a product of 15 seconds of fame but has no touch of reality that she is a light weight!!!!

February 07 2011 at 4:20 PM Report abuse +8 rate up rate down Reply
tenderlies1

Again Sara Palin is way out of her league on Regan or Politics in General. I wish someone could tell me what this woman has accomplished that give her the right to choose one TV Station to spew her twisted knowledge on as well as tweet and every other station including the internet picks it up as some sort of truth. I have no problem with this woman making money nor do I have a problem with her campaigning and making money for the Republican Party, But I have to draw a line when her words that divide and hurt this country are a lot of lies and no back-up, If she intends to run for President then Run and stop toying with it to simply hurt others and keep the checks rolling in. Come out in the open and show you can stand toe to toe not only with the competition but the news Media as well. As for the Democrats they could care less if she runs as she won't even get past the Primaries but for gods sake lets get on with it as she will need a head start and with the way they are doing her party may need one as well. And by the way she is not the authority on Ronald Regan and she certainly will never see the day that she is anywhere like him. Its sad to say but I am totally sick of hearing and seeing this woman and I hope we can remove Bachman as well her next election. Surely we have better representivies than these two to be in the office of any goverment position.

February 07 2011 at 3:58 PM Report abuse +8 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to tenderlies1's comment
jgr414155

I'm not going to waist my time trying to explaining what Sarah has done. Go to the libary and check out her book and read it. It will make your aware of her accomplishments, how she stood up to the Republican establishment and the oil companies.

February 07 2011 at 10:10 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
coreydietjournal

You are dead right.

Only thing she has accomplished: She is a well-spoken, very polished in appearance woman the Republican party has no problem backing in hopes the average American preoccupied with Facebook and Tweeting and buying discounted nail treatments on the internet will listen to her because she is a woman and attractive.

This nation is a disappointment. Until Miss Palin has one feasible suggestion to correct a problem, she is part of the problem.

February 26 2011 at 10:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bthered

It's to bad Sarah didn't have to work and raise a family during the Reagan years. Had she had to take two or three cuts in pay and go home every night praying she would still have job in the morning, she might have a different view of Reagan..Reagan had one goal and that was to get rid of the American Middle Class.He never met an Anti-Worker Policie that didn't love.

February 07 2011 at 2:40 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to bthered's comment
mulliganta

An interesting take on the man who saved the US economy!

February 09 2011 at 8:10 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
wra3577984

Imagine.... prior to Mrs. Palin stepping onto the bridge where the shaken Captain was manning the helm; the USS McCain had suffered so much damage while running aground in earlier waters under the inept tutelage of Captain McMcain and his crew of loyalist, that the battered hulk of battered ideology and poor seamanship was beyond repair and headed for dry-dock in a safe harbor identified as; Senators Dry Dock and Port of Safety.

Now imagine this, in order to save face the loyal crew with a little so called slight of hand and a silent nod of approval from the Captain attempted to marginalize the able young female who, came to their rescue and managed to bring a little clarity to their plight, aboard a ship making its way through troubled and turbulent waters, toward the safety of shallow waters, while at the same time, steering her listed course from a port listing to a starboard port, while implementing the notion that scuttling the USS McCain in open seas was not an option she was considering.

Little did she know at the time, that the old Captain and his band of loyalist were not about to let this young vibrant Valkyrie of the seas, gain any favor regarding her heroic efforts to save them from them selves, or the ravishes of the cold sea. So the moral of this short story, shipmates is; the attempted efforts to marginalize or discount the sailing or hunting abilities of Mrs. Palin might just, prove to be an unsuitable course that will in the end, be unsettling for the shameless heretics. WFR

February 07 2011 at 7:45 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to wra3577984's comment
coreydietjournal

I am unsure as to what you are sating, but I think you mean to say Palin should be a waitress in New York City or someplace, not trying to manage this country's problems.

February 26 2011 at 10:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
wbischo

The American people were totally taken in and "snowed" by the self-serving Ronald Reagan, while he made pretty speeches and assured them that he was "doing what was best for the country". He supported dictators because he felt they were "better allies" to America. That included Saddam Hussein, to whom he supplied the arms and chemicals to murder his people. He supported the government which murdered one hundred thousand Mayans. He made deals with Iran for arms and other concessions so that they would not release American hostages until AFTER the election between himself and Jimmy Carter. Then Iran turned on Reagan and used those arms to kill 241 American Marines.

February 07 2011 at 3:11 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to wbischo's comment
jgr414155

If you know your history, Iran was the enemy at the time and was at war with Iraq, hence the weapons to Sadam. After years of Senate Investigations and media probing, Ronald Reagan could not be connected to the arms to Iran deal. The Mayan empire broke up around 900 AD. I suppose this too is Reagans fault.

February 07 2011 at 10:18 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
wbischo

I believe that the Spartacus Educational Biography of Reagan, was more accurate than all these tribute stories which idolize Reagan as if he was a God. I believe he was one of the most two faced, coniving and anti-American Presidents we have ever had. I have always believed that, and when I read the Spartacus Biography, I knew I had always been right.

February 07 2011 at 2:48 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Ray

Sarah Palin is the Norm Crosby of politics but not as smart. It is amazing to me that conservatives try to revise history and make Reagan a great President. Following are some facts for those who get their info from FOX News:

-Reagan put into law the largest tax increase in history up to that point and he
raised taxes seven of his eight years in office.
- He tripled the deficit to three trillion dollars - three times the amount over the previous 80 years
- After the Reagan tax cuts to the rich, unemployment rose to 10.8%
-He left a large deficit when he left office
-Federal spending increased substantially during his terms.
-He illegally funnelled money, secretly, to Iran
-He funded Islamist mujahidin fighters in Afghanistan. Osama and the Taliban emerged from those groups. His proxy war after the Soviets retreated played a direct role in Bin Laden's ascenency.

These are the are the facts. Those who are drinking the Kool-aid served-up by FOX news and that ilk ought to make an effort to read more and not be sucked-in to revisionists history

February 06 2011 at 9:58 PM Report abuse +11 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Ray's comment
mulliganta

Facts huh? Here are a few for you.

In January 1981 Reagan lifted remaining domestic petroleum price and allocation controls, and in August 1981 he lowered the oil windfall profits tax. Also in 1981 the Economic Recovery Act (the largest tax cuts ever enacted) included the expensing of depreciable property, incentives for small businesses, incentives for savings, slashed estate taxes, trimmed taxes paid by business corporations, decreased the marginal income tax rates across the board by 23% over three years, with the top rate falling from 70% to 50% and the bottom rate dropping from 14% to 11%. Additionally the tax rates were indexed for inflation.

As for tax increases? Let's see... Reagan temporarily increased the US gas tax from 4 cents to 9 cents in 1982 to help pay for highway repairs during the recession (gasp!). Also in 1982, the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act closed some loopholes and introduced tougher enforcement of tax rules, correcting some things from the 1981 tax cuts but keeping the lowered tax rates intact.

Reagan passed the Social Security Amendments in 1983. Without legislative action, it would not have been possible to continue paying OASDI cash benefits on time beginning in July 1983. That is, SS was going broke on his watch and it had to be "fixed". An estimated $150-$200 billion in increased revenues or reduced expenditures was needed to restore financial viability through the 1980’s. With bipartisan support the 98th Congress passed the amendments in record time.

In 1983 the Interest and Dividend Tax Compliance Act was passed. The law changed how taxes are assessed on interest and dividends. Yawn.

In 1986 the Tax Reform Act was designed to be tax revenue neutral, because individual taxes were decreased while corporate taxes were increased. (Less taxes for me! Yay! More for businesses.)

All in all, Reagan's tax cuts were far greater than his tax increases. (http://www.capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1632/reagans-tax-increases). Does anyone disagree? Find me someone.

Isn't it sad people still cling to falsehoods about Reagan's record? Even the staunchest liberals conceed Reagan's greatness nowadays! Why do you think Obama agreed to Bush's tax cuts to spur on the economy? Because he learned from Bush and Reagan!

February 07 2011 at 1:50 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
coreydietjournal

Ray's commentary is dead on. Palin is unqualified to do more than ramble on.

She gets by for one reason: The GOP loves having tall, articulate, polished attractive women promoting their ideals.

Palin, Coulter, Bachmann. They ramble on and on. Only reason they get TV slots is they are physically attractive.

Sad as hell.
Telly Savalas Blog www.myopera.com/mopery

February 26 2011 at 10:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>