AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
It was clear that Bachmann was still struggling with her some of her facts. She spent several minutes discussing the national debt, explaining the difference between billions and trillions, claiming that since 2006 it has been the Democratic Congress that was at fault for the ballooning of the deficit. She conveniently left out of her remarks that one of the biggest contributors to the deficit were the major tax cuts in the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, signed by George W. Bush.She was the rallying cheerleader, the great keynote speaker......but she got her facts wrong. As far as I am concerned the facts are important, unless our desire is to leave the big decisions up to those who don't know the facts. Does anyone else think we have a problem?
February 16 2011 at 4:41 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyHonestly, she makes me embarrassed to be from Minnesota. I mean God forbid anyone does anything to help the people of this country if it doesn't directly benefit them, financially or politically. By throwing words out there (like Socialism and Obamacare) that sound big and scary and, by telling people that the government wants control every aspect of your life, is retarding (Definition of RETARD transitive verb
1: to slow up especially by preventing or hindering advance or accomplishment:impede (http://www.merriam-webster.com)) this country. It really is. I wish these politicians (Left and right) would just stop all of this negative rhetoric and finger pointing and work together to make America the greatest country in the world again!
Michele Bachmann is another Sarah Palin. Sarah and Michele lack history and fact background. These two should go back to study 111 History.
February 13 2011 at 3:10 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyA good well written piece Joanne, But the one line equating or at least associating GWB with conservatism when he passed that prescription drug entitlement was as progressive as they get, and a long way from conservatism.
February 10 2011 at 8:52 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyShe is going to over shadow Palin. Palin is nothing compared to her.
February 10 2011 at 6:41 PM Report abuse Permalink +7 rate up rate down ReplyIdentifying and understanding are 2 different things. Maybe her staff she be doing more reseach so she will stop getting the facts wrong. Or maybe she knows the fact sbut would prefer to lie, as it fits her agenda better.
February 16 2011 at 4:45 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplySo... given the posts here.. Our government is running fine and has not problems with over spending.
There are alot of people who would be for across the board spending cuts... We don't have a problem with undertaxing... we have a problem with overspending.
Reagan raised taxes 9 times. He tripled the size of government and left the largest deficit ever. This was larger than the last 80 budgets combined!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
February 13 2011 at 9:18 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyThis Congresswoman has a deep penchant for overloading her mouth, and more recently her ill-advised rhetoric to cut benefits was directed to veterans. Well, guess what? She's not fond of me, but then I'm not fond of her either so we're even. For her to be an attorney, she's sorely lacking. Most attorneys' I know, are keenly familiar with the historical events of our Constitution. Moreover, she had to take an oath of office before becoming a member of Congress yet she has an extremely poor account of historical events leading up to the Constitutioin, and that's sad - sad for me and sad for her Minnesota constituents.
February 10 2011 at 5:18 PM Report abuse Permalink +15 rate up rate down ReplyI always love how these Tea Party Republicans talk about small government, but seem to think it's okay for government to set a social agenda.
February 10 2011 at 5:11 PM Report abuse Permalink +13 rate up rate down ReplyWow... I think i missed the part where she said she was for socialism...Please point that out for all of us.
February 10 2011 at 5:43 PM Report abuse Permalink -9 rate up rate down ReplyI don't know much about her, except she is the only Congress person, who with her staff has gone thru the budget and identified $432 billion of cuts for discussion. If every person in Congress did that, we would be amazed at the cuts that they could actually agree on.
February 10 2011 at 1:41 PM Report abuse Permalink -13 rate up rate down ReplyHer plans included a proposed $4.5 billion cut in veterans' benefits. She only backed off when several vets' groups turned the spotlight on her little scheme to turn our soldiers' small rewards into personal political capital. As a veteran, rest assured I will never turn my back on this woman.
February 10 2011 at 3:35 PM Report abuse Permalink +25 rate up rate down ReplyI think its time the Republicans roll over Miss Bachmann. Isn't she the one who called for an invistagation of members of Congress and in a raving statement on "Hard Ball" acted like the head of the Nazi Party. Now the Republicans should put a stop to this out of control member of their party. I wouldn't even call her a Ms she is way out of touch....
February 10 2011 at 1:26 PM Report abuse Permalink +16 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
17 Comments