AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Gingrich, 67, and Callista, 44, have a high-profile partnership producing homages to conservative causes and heroes. The latest books from Gingrich Productions are about Ronald Reagan and George Washington. The subjects of the latest films are Reagan, terrorism, religion in America and how Pope John Paul II's 1979 trip to Poland helped lead to the fall of Communism there (Gingrich became a Catholic two years ago after having had his first two marriages annulled). Fans can keep up with their travels, their restaurant meals and their films, books and articles at Newt.org or on Twitter (@NewtGingrich and @CallyGingrich).how desperate can a woman be nowadays to marry a cheater/philanderer? catholics beware. if you lie to your wives,desert them in their time of need,what apatheic human being. a great politician. he belongs back in washington with that guy whosolicited sex from a male in an airport toilet. what a despicable way to live
March 13 2011 at 12:35 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyBack in the '90s, Ms. Jackie was my math teacher as well. To this day, I credit her with teaching me something useful in Geometry. When Newt became Speaker, Hard Copy came to our school and EVERY employee there wore a button that declared them to be Jackie Gingrich. That says a lot for the integrity of Ms. Jackie- everyone wanted to protect her and the girls. Where I'm from, everyone knows Newt and you either love him or hate him. Let's just say he won't be receiving a vote from me should he actually make it on the ballot.
March 05 2011 at 9:19 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThree marriages and cheating on the first two while married to them makes him a conservative republican but doesn't make him Christian. He has done more to hurt traditional marriage than any gay marriage could do. Huckabee denying that Obama is an American when it has been proven that he is an American; Newt claiming to be a conservative christian and Sarah Palin just lying all the time doesn't speak well for the choices of conservatives.
March 02 2011 at 6:47 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyHaving just read the Article regarding Newt and his Wife..and being an extremely educated and "Middle of the Road" Female...Its arrogant and not at all in the Best Interest of this Country for Newt to run for the GOP Nomination...We do have a need to hold our Leaders to a High Standard and we are ALL respomsible for the Chices we make...We.ve had enough of hearing about Politicians dirty "Laundry"..which we would all be subjected to again if He chooses to run.
February 27 2011 at 3:36 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down Replyfirst off does he have any children from the 2 marriages before? Reason for this question is Newt had both of his previous marriages annuled. So he is not acknowledging the sacred marriages, the commitment he made to his wives and with God,or what marriage stands for and if there were children born out of either marriage, what does he call them? Believe you have to be responsible in your personal and professional life equally to have a even balance and to uphold your integrity. No I would not consider him a candidate for Presidency. Sorry!
February 23 2011 at 8:19 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyThe children of the previous marriages are legitimate, according to Catholic canon law. Legitimacy really has more to do with a LEGAL marriage in the eyes of civil law. A child born to a couple who are married by the laws of the state is considered legitimate. An annulment has to do with a SACRAMENTAL marriage. If the Church tribunal rules that the previous marriage(s) were never sacramental in the eyes of God, they may rule that a sacramental marriage never existed. That is what an annulment is. Sometimes the tribunal rules the previous marriage WAS sacramental, and an annulment is not granted (which means any subsequent marriage is considered adultery). However, an annulment has no bearing whatsoever in regard to civil laws concerning divorce, or the legitimacy of children.
February 27 2011 at 1:18 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyI have alot of respect for Newt's knowledge and patriotism. He and the 94 congress did balance the budget as the house makes the budget not the president. Some one needs to make difficult choices and make big cuts or we are going under like it or not
February 23 2011 at 7:28 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyI do but afraid it wont be posted. ted kennedy served for alot of years and alot of people would say he served his country well. But he had scandals, why cant newt have a chance
February 23 2011 at 7:25 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyWow, let's give Newt a chance, he's morally bankrupt, but who cares, President Clinton had an affair, why not? wilbur, that way of thinking is exactly why our country and our politics are so messed up. Weren't you taught, two wrongs don't make a right?
February 23 2011 at 7:34 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyNO!!!!!! Not this woman!!!
February 23 2011 at 6:47 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyThis woman would not suport Newt whether he had affairs or not! Let's all remember the past in the political arena.
February 23 2011 at 6:41 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyI doubt that anyone can make a good case for conservatives being any less moral than other segments of our culture. It's just that conservatives have mouthed off so loudly and consistently about everyone else's sins, that when they, themselves, do something kinky, it makes them look ridiculously pathetic. It is a mystery thus far unexplained by anyone. How can ultra-conservatives---who purport to represent a non-judgmental philosophy---spend their entire political, talk-show, pundit or commentator career harshly judging other people? Can any Christian take seriously anyone who claims to be Christian who represents virtually none of the principles of that religion? Not judging; just asking; you decide. If I were a conservative Republican I would have to wonder if my "leaders" are really what they claim to be, or are they just putting me on.
February 23 2011 at 6:10 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
87 Comments