Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Crash Pad Congressmen: Lawmakers Sleeping in Offices May Be Breaking Rules, Watchdogs Say

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size

Who was that weird guy wandering around in his bathrobe in the halls of the Rayburn House Office Building the other night? Oops, never mind, it's a congressman.

With a growing number of House members saving money by sleeping in their Capitol Hill offices, a watchdog group has asked the Office of Congressional Ethics to determine whether they're breaking the rules, or unfairly enjoying a tax-free benefit, with their rudimentary free housing.

"House office buildings are not dorms or frat houses," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of the nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). "If members didn't want to find housing in Washington, they shouldn't have run for Congress in the first place."

Rank and file members of the House have offices in one of three buildings adjacent to the Capitol -- the Rayburn, Longworth or Cannon -- and most of the suites have bathrooms, sinks and perhaps even a kitchenette. In the past, a handful of pennypinchers would sack out on sofas or air mattresses in their offices to avoid paying rent in Washington -- which can run $1,500 to $2,000 monthly for a one-bedroom -- or simply to show the folks back home what little they cared about the culture of the capital.

In some cases, crash pad congressmen say they do it to save time: "The job requires late nights and early mornings, and a short commute lets me focus on the work that's important to my constituents," Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) told Politico.

But it's gotten endemic this year, according to the citizens group. Crew said at least 33 representatives -- all men -- have been identified in news reports as crashing in their offices. The frugal fellows trek off to the House gym for their showers and shaves. They hail from as close to Washington as Delaware and Virginia, and from as far away as California and Arizona. Five of them represent Arizona districts, reportedly including freshman Rep. Ben Quayle, son of former Vice President Dan Quayle.

CREW questioned whether the austere lifestyle violates a ban on using taxpayer resources -- a congressional building's facilities -- for anything other than performance of official duties, which probably doesn't include sleeping and bathing. In addition, the watchdogs argued that the lodgings constitute a taxable benefit, just as legislators' reserved parking spaces at the Capitol are imputed taxable income.

Since most House members commute from their districts, many of them have the burden of assuming both a house payment and monthly rent -- or in some cases two house payments. They make $174,000 annually, but most maintain their primary residences and families in their home districts and travel back and forth throughout the year. Some save by sharing spartan apartments near the Capitol.

But CREW seemed unsympathetic to the money-saving or workaholic arguments. "If legislators are going to treat their offices as dorm rooms, at the very least they should pay the appropriate taxes," Sloan said. "In any event, it brings discredit upon the House for members of Congress to sleep in their House offices, making it more difficult for housekeeping, maintenance and construction crews to do their jobs. And really, who wants to run into a member of Congress in need of a shower wandering the halls in sweats or a robe?"

The official ethics office has not said what action, if any, it will take.

Folo Tom Diemer on Twitter http://twitter.com/tomdiemer

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

14 Comments

Filter by:
sgentilejr

These Congressmen are earning $174,000 per year and say they cannot afford to rent an apartment in Washington DC so they sleep in their offices which are US Government Property. OK you got this far now THINK. These Congressmen all have a Congressional staff of 6 to 12 workers in their Congressional Offices working for them at salaries averaging around $40,000 per year. How do the Congressman's staff survive in DC on salaries averaging only $40,00 per year, when the Congressmen say they cannot pay rent on their salaries or $174,000 per year.
How about the 200,000 federal workers who work all over DC in offices for salaries averaging $40,000 per year___Should they all be allowed to sleep where they work because their salaries are far lower than the Congressman's salaries.
Can post office workers in DC with a starting salary of $28,000 per year sleep in the post offices where they work? Can social security employees earning $35,000 per year in DC sleep in their offices to avoid paying rent??
Better yet, if it costs so much to live in Washington DC why did the President and Congress Freeze salaries of federal workers who earn way under $50,00 per year on average. How are the workers supposed to live on low salaries when their bosses the Congressmen claim they cannot live on $174,000 per year?
Look it up on Jobs USA___Federal airport security jobs starts at $9.00 per hour. Federal National Forest Service fire forest fighters start at $9.00 per hour. Federal Park rangers that work around the monuments in DC start at $8.50 per hour. Yet the Congressmen claim they cannot pay rent on their $174,00 per year salaries.

February 22 2011 at 2:56 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
trb2244

Much ado about nothing...

February 16 2011 at 6:16 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
B

There is no reason for being opposed to this except to stir up controversy!
Sleep where you want...

February 15 2011 at 11:03 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
rcwolkens

They have an office assigned to them and they make use of it 24 hours a day. If they are that frugal with their time and expenses, they are probably spending our money economically. We need more congressmen like that.

February 15 2011 at 10:54 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
exnyorker

SHAME SHAME SHAME. My 26 yr old daughter lives and works in DC. She currently earns $1300 per week (and taxes are high in DC!). NO BENEFITS. She rents a safe and secure 2 BR and 2 bath apt with a friend (doorman for security, laundry facilities etc) and being at Mt Vernon Sq, is walkable to the Capitol. She splits the rent and pays $1050 per month. My 23 yr old son also lives and works in DC - $850 per week in salary (NO BENEFITS) and pays $950 per month rent in a historic row house in one of DC's trendiest centrally located areas.

February 15 2011 at 9:19 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to exnyorker's comment
atlasusa

Our representatives need to take some budgeting lessons from your children. Our representatives are proving themselves to be an incompetent bunch if they can't find affordable housing like your kids have.

February 15 2011 at 9:42 PM Report abuse +10 rate up rate down Reply
chasingheather1

174k annually, plus all benefits- that is not including all of the lobbyists- try more like 250k- they should have to have a place to live- or made to quit the job- would your boss allow you to sleep at work just because you do not have a place to live by choice?!? I say- take all of their salaries away- wouldn't that help reduce the deficit- working in congress should be for free- after all do they not want what is best for the country.

February 15 2011 at 8:28 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
djtkhay

Are there no homeless shelters or boarding house to which these poor congressmen may adjourn to? I suppose cutting non-defense spending has reduced the number of surplus homeless shelters thus necessitating their bunking in their Capital Hill offices. Very frugal. I wondered if I as a tax payer could also get a place. I Googled room reservations on Capital Hill, but to no avail. I kept getting directed to a Citizens United web site. Can't figure that one out.

Anyway, at least they have a gym to go to in the morning. Our founding fathers were well ahead of their times. Imagine designing a gym into the Capital. It must not be original as I can't envision our early members of Congress pumping iron in between voting on the Sedition Acts and complaining about Barbary Coast terrorists. From what I can gather from my old Virginia History text book, the gym was most likely added right after the Spanish burned Washington during the French and Indian War of 1912. Nevertheless, extraordinary foresight and quite useful in building strength to battle runaway spending and reduce the national debt.

February 15 2011 at 8:18 PM Report abuse +13 rate up rate down Reply
BOSS

If I moved for my job, would not allow me to sleep in the office. Bunk together, that is what a lot of others do. Live outside the DC area. Charles County is w/in 45 minutes and rents are cheaper. Get over it. You have a job, be grateful.

February 15 2011 at 8:06 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
wjs27skeet

So lets see if I have this right. Congressmen can have a residence in expensive DC paid for by the taxpayers, or sleep in THEIR office free, and a private organization CREW objects to saving the taxpayer money. HMMMMMM

February 15 2011 at 7:57 PM Report abuse -6 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to wjs27skeet's comment
sadieloo

No you don't have it right. The taxpayers are paying his salary and instead of using it to pay rent they are sleeping in their offices also paid for by the taxpayer. How does that save us any money. Might save them but not us.

February 15 2011 at 8:51 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
fuelflea

They make the $174K, plus a per diem. The perdiem covers the cost of lodging, plus a MIE (meals and incidental expenses) stipened. If they are not using the lodging money for lodging, they should pay that portion back. Their expenses in Washington are no different than if your employer sends you on a business trip, and reimburses your expenses. Their employers are their constituents back home.

February 15 2011 at 10:02 PM Report abuse +10 rate up rate down Reply
Margarita

Margarita-
No wonder these guys have no idea how the rest of us live. I am on Social Security and they all want to cut my check. Guys, I clear @%980 dollars a nonth, less than a month's rent in DC. I get noooooo freebies. Come on, start spending your own money for a change and leave my paltry sum alone.

February 15 2011 at 7:54 PM Report abuse +14 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners