Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Arizona's Stormy Senate Race: Why the National GOP Is Watching

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
When Rep. Jeff Flake, a pro-immigration-reform Arizona Republican, said earlier this week he would run for the U.S. Senate in 2012, he immediately set off a chain of political storms inside and outside his own party, both in his state and in Washington.

His campaign is no home-state affair. It could be a barometer of GOP unity nationwide, illustrating how the party would navigate the divisions between its two major wings -- its hard-line tea party advocates and its traditional conservatives.

Arizona already has been a player at the national presidential level, and Flake's candidacy may be the GOP's first electoral test of conservative solidarity after its triumph in the midterm elections last year. Fractures are already in evidence in the U.S. House, where newcomers elected in large part with tea party support are breaking ranks with establishment leaders.
It wasn't a surprise that once Flake, 48, a fiscal conservative, announced his decision to run for the seat of retiring conservative Sen. Jon Kyl, the Senate minority whip, the extreme right wing that has dominated Arizona politics lately didn't waste time denouncing him for bucking key items in their political agenda.

On three wedge issues -- immigration, gays in the military, and Cuba – Flake defies the conventional conservative line. He supports immigration reform, voted to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," and supports ending the Cuba trade embargo and travel ban.

Still, some Republican organizations climbed on the Flake bandwagon early on. He already won the endorsement of the Tea Party group Freedom Works and the Club for Growth, which has raised more than $100,000 for his campaign.

Flake can certainly expect heavy primary opposition from candidates to his right, including the anti-immigrant Maricopa County (Phoenix) Sheriff Joe Arpaio and former Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-Ariz.), who gave Sen. John McCain, the 2008 GOP presidential candidate, a run for his money last year.

Hayworth's popularity with Arizona's hardline conservatives ended up pushing McCain toward tougher views on immigration, gays in the military and other issues on which McCain, once celebrated as a maverick Republican, had taken moderate stands in the past.

The Democrats, likely to spot an opportunity in the split within the Arizona GOP, will probably try to put forward a brand name. Already, Janet Napolitano, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and former Arizona governor, is being talked up in the political rumor mills. The Hill reported on Thursday that GOP operatives were looking for political documents from the Department of Homeland Security to use against Napolitano.

But some political commentators are starting to talk about Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, 41, for the U.S. Senate seat. Giffords is recovering at a Houston rehabilitation hospital from the gunshot wound to her head she suffered in an assassination attempt in Tucson on Jan. 8.

With no regard for good taste and sensitivity, a Washington Post blogger, Aaron Blake, endorsed the talk of Giffords for the Senate seat, saying: "There are several examples of politicians dying but still winning their next election."

That comment and others along those lines brought a rebuke from Ken Rudin, an NPR blogger. "Let's wait for her to come out of the hospital before we start anointing her as the Democratic great hope to win a Senate seat,'' he wrote. "It just feels unseemly. Or just plain icky."

As to the Republicans, at this early point in the race, Flake is the favorite. On the Democrats' side, only Napolitano and Giffords are seen as having a good chance to win.

Flake will have to soft-pedal some of his views in a state where immigration hardliners have wanted to get him out of office. He will have to turn around many in the large majority of fellow Arizonans (88 percent of registered Republicans) who supported the state's tough immigration law in a poll last year.

It won't be easy. Flake sponsored the failed Strive Act in 2006 and 2007, a bill that included opening a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. This is sacrilege in Arizona, which sees itself as the last frontier against illegal immigration and is now proposing further legislation that would require hospitals to require immigrants seeking medical attention to present documentation on their status.

Asked on Tuesday if he would still defend his views on immigration, he told Mother Jones magazine, "I've always felt that nearly half of those who are here illegally didn't sneak across the border. They came here and overstayed." He emphasized that border security would have to come first.

Though he is a fiscal conservative and pro-life, he said he would campaign as a social moderate, regardless of retaliation from the right. Maybe Flake is Arizona's new political maverick.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

5 Comments

Filter by:
mit62

THE HOPE THAT THE ARIZONA RACE DIVIDES REPUBS, IS A HOPE, OR MORE ACCURATELY, A DREAM. MOST OF THE PEOPLE THAT WANT OPEN BORDERS MUST NOT LIVE IN THE SOUTHWEST BUT ONLY WANT TO SETUP THE DEMS WITH THE FUTURE LATIN VOTE. SOUNDS LIKE TAMANNY HALL AT THE TURN OF THE 20th CENTURY.
I HAVE A SUGGESTION, HAVE LAW-ABIDING ILLEGALS APPLY FOR LEGAL STATUS: ONE CONDITION IS THAT NEVER BECOME CITIZENS AND THEREFORE CAN NEVER VOTE. THEY ALSO PAY A FINE OF $5,000/YEAR THEY'VE BEEN HERE; $10000 EVERY YEAR THEREAFTER MINUS THE U.S. INCOME TAX THEY'VE PAID. THEIR CHILDREN CAN BECOME CITIZENS BY JOINING THE MILITARY FOR 4 YEARS. YEARS IN COLLEGE DON'T COUNT. THEN WE CAN EXPLAIN TO AMERICANS WHO CAN'T FIND WORK WHY THIS IS A GOOD IDEA.

February 18 2011 at 4:22 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
cae973

As Independents who lives in Az both my husband and I and our adult children will not vote for Flake due to his record of support for illegals while so many citizens of this state are unemployed, losing their homes and struggling to Feed their families!

February 18 2011 at 4:05 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
bdinsight

If AZ conservatives don't like him he may be worth supporting.

February 18 2011 at 12:51 PM Report abuse -9 rate up rate down Reply
ettu

All that has been said in this article holds true for both the Hard Left faction of the Dem Party, and the Hard Right of the Republican Party. They cause trouble, but neither fringe group will ever gain the power they seek. We are a majority huddled near the center, and thus we will remain.

February 18 2011 at 11:12 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
dirgraphic

Napolitano?? Are we crazy??

February 18 2011 at 10:31 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>