Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

New Mexico Sen. Jeff Bingaman's Decision Not to Run is Setback for Democrats

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
New Mexico Sen. Jeff Bingaman has decided against running for a sixth term in 2012, handing Democrats another challenge in their effort to hold the majority in the U.S. Senate.

Bingaman, a 67-year-old lawyer, has represented the southwestern swing state for nearly three decades. The low profile senator is chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. "The end of this Congress is the right time for me to step aside and allow someone else to serve," he said on Friday.

Bingaman is the third Democratic senator to take a pass on reelection, following Sens. Jim Webb of Virginia and Kent Conrad of North Dakota. All represent states that Republicans think they can capture in 2012. Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, who caucuses with the Democratic majority, has also announced his retirement. Counting Lieberman and one other independent who usually votes with them, the Democrats hold a 53-47 edge in the Senate.

Brian Walsh, spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said Bingaman's decision "immediately presents another strong pickup opportunity for Senate Republicans" in a battleground state.

Bingaman, as chairman of the energy panel, was in the middle of the failed effort in the last Congress to pass cap-and-trade legislation regulating greenhouse gases. He is working with the Obama administration this year on clean energy initiatives. He also is also senior member of the Finance Committee.

After learning of Bingaman's retirement, President Obama called the senator a respected and "tireless advocate for preserving America's natural resources and promoting a clean energy future."'

Folo Tom Diemer on Twitter http://twitter.com/tomdiemer

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

115 Comments

Filter by:
tmor3224

A nice, naive, intellectual lightweight wil be gone. Its practically certain that New Mexico can do better, regardless of the party label.

February 22 2011 at 10:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael

The Democrats' greatest problem is their policy record of metastatic growth of the Federal government, record borrowing, record spending, record unemployment, and every performance target missed. New Federal jobs have not made Americans' lives better on the whole and have been particularly bad for those they have failed: regulators did not protect Madoff's investors, nor homeowners, nor workers, nor student achievement, nor stop the banksters' mortgage schemes. In fact, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd shouted down Republican attempts to rein the risk. Maxine Waters also chimed in, not mentioning the sweetheart deal her husband's bank was getting. I have my problems with Republicans, but on the record, no hope for Democrats.

February 20 2011 at 7:21 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
tistolaugh

Based on the Dems' decision to quickly become the party of no following the 2010 elections, I believe it will be less about who is running than America booting Dems simply for being Dems again.

February 18 2011 at 11:48 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
ironwulf

Wait and watch. He just sees the writing on the wall. 2012, the senate is going Rep. Not necessarily because people are pro Rep, but because they are becoming more and more anti- Dem.

February 18 2011 at 7:54 PM Report abuse +19 rate up rate down Reply
mooncop1

Three decades as a politician no wonder things are so messed up. He should have been gone years ago.

February 18 2011 at 7:37 PM Report abuse +25 rate up rate down Reply
sseldorado

I would say republicans shouldn't count their gains just yet. We will see how the people like being played for fools in 2012. No real action on anything positive for the country and economy just culture war crap they drag around with them and roll out every election!

February 18 2011 at 7:07 PM Report abuse -31 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to sseldorado's comment
oldengineera2

The people were certainly successfully played for fools in the 2008 campaign: "Not one dime in new taxes", "sustainability", "transparency", "every bill posted online 5 days before a vote", "I will go through the budget line by line to eliminate waste", "we will eliminate programs that aren't working", and so on ad nauseum.
Some voters are wising up a bit. It'll be hard to float that scenario again given the light of 21 months of unemployment over 9% following a hasty and ill-targeted, borrowed trillion down the rabbit hole.

February 20 2011 at 9:53 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
edrahe

In my opinion he has certainly overstayed his welcome. Perhaps he can now persue a career in the real world, but of course he need not since his pension far exceeds those of us who get one week for each year worked.

February 18 2011 at 6:39 PM Report abuse +36 rate up rate down Reply
glasses60

Let's hope a few more Democratic Senators will see the light and decide not to run
in 2012. A Republican Senate will ensure that spending will drastically be cut, the deficit will be reduced, Obama Care will be nullified and illegal immigration and entitlements to illegals will be addressed. We need to take back our Country
before it is too late.

February 18 2011 at 6:04 PM Report abuse +49 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to glasses60's comment
licwinko

I think they have already seen that light, they already fled Wisconsin, police are looking for them as we speak....LOL

February 18 2011 at 7:26 PM Report abuse +24 rate up rate down Reply
canienaga

Boy, talk about wishful thinking. The last time we had a Republican controlled congress, they did nothing to control the financial industry or to help reform health care. They just made sure that big business and Wall Street were taken care of and look what that got us. Remember the recession started in early 2006, but it was the policies that occurred in the prior years that got us where we are today. Considering that they cater to the top 2% of income earners, I hope you are in that group. If not, your screwed.... I was in that top 2%, but still felt like they didn't do much to help the rest of the country.

February 18 2011 at 7:27 PM Report abuse -28 rate up rate down Reply
jay love

yes, this senator most likly has a fancy lobby, or private sector job all lined up in advance, someone he was cozy with during his six terms in the senate? so this slug will have a rich pension and health care for life and also make a suitcase full of money on the side? great job, ruin our country and then abandon ship as it all falls? seems like he has all our interests at heart all along?

February 18 2011 at 5:58 PM Report abuse +42 rate up rate down Reply
thescot

He is not going to run because he knows he will lose.

February 18 2011 at 5:47 PM Report abuse +43 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners