AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Dukakis had mentioned both ideas in a descriptive summary of what he said Americans had a right to expect from their leaders: Competence, job creation, opportunity, and "American values. Old fashioned values like accountability and responsibility and respect for the truth."Dukakis regularly turned killers loose from prison, including Willie Horton, because he believed that people could be reformed. Then, during the campaign, he rode on the top of a tank, looking like a monkey, and wanted people to believe that he could be the commander in chief. Went over as very poorly done and had the opposite reaction.
February 20 2011 at 9:27 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThis may be one reason Dukakis lost: I was so furious after watching the debates that I voted for Jesse Jackson. Neither Dukakis nor Bush would answer a single question. They had their rehearsed one-liners and that was all they could say. Debaters should be made to answer the questions or be cut off. If they can't come up with something unprogrammed, they are too stupid to be president. We have had enough of stupid presidents.
February 20 2011 at 6:34 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyDon't think I like Mitch Daniel's Math. After all, this war is truly what emptied the surplus. And as far as raising taxes, all the GOP are going to realize that the tax give aways to everyone are going to have to be RECALLED. All my tax breaks this year will put a LITTLE gas in my car. Think about it. Forget charisma we need a president who can do the MATH. The GOP MATH only helps the RICH,not the middle class.
February 20 2011 at 11:13 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyI remember Don Meredith saying once that if there was a personality contest between Bud Grant (then coach of the Minnesota Vikings) and Tom Landry (coach of the Dallas cowboys) both of whom were very competent coaches, there wouldn't be a winner. That reminds me of Mitch Daniels.
February 20 2011 at 10:12 AM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyI used to religiously read Will. He was a pulitzer prize winning columnist that I admired for 20 years. George F Will is a lying republican shill. He will change his opinion the moment the republican party changes its policies. He has never met a republican idea he doesn't like. Again,example:1998 was the warmest year in weather history until 2005, so for 7 years Will said the Earth is cooling down. That's like saying a guy with a temperature of 102 doesn't have a fever because an hour ago it was 104.
February 20 2011 at 10:05 AM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyIf you're a democrat, Will would be a bad choice--About global warming
this horse is almost dead-You libs well have to find some thing else to
con money out of --Weather you like it or not weather changes every 7 years
we're in the cool cycle-- asbestos is bad, well we the only country not using it --Learn how to use it etc.
We seem to be free of significant indications of competence in Washington today. I am reminded of the old cartoon in which the door of the School for the Gifted labelled "Pull" won't open for the student who is pushing with all his might.
That summarizes the results of administration's attempts to borrow our way to financial responsibility and spend our way to thrift.
your talking about Bush right? because that is exactly what he did
February 20 2011 at 1:20 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyHere's what missing from the above article: In his op-ed dealing with the "charisma of competence", Geo. Will cites excerpts from Daniels' speech at the recent CPAC Convention. It's worth the time to find that speech and see how certain of its contents echo then-candidate Obama in 2008 when he had that exchange with Joe (the plumber) Wertzelbacher; i.e. an more equitable distribution of wealth, re-building the middle class, and giving people at low levels on the economic ladder a chance to earn more and rise. It's all there in Daniels' speech. How is it then that this Republican, touted as presidential timber, isn't a socialist??? The answer, of course, is that he isn't and neither is Obama, conservatives' frothing at the mouth notwithstanding.
February 20 2011 at 8:42 AM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyPlease, I beg of George Will and any American voter who might be considering Mitch Daniel as your presidential candidate, ask the people of Indiana. Daniel was considered by many of his employees as an incompetent executive at Eli Lily and is intensely disliked by a large portion of Indiana residents. You turned your noses up at Indiana's Richard Lugar as a presidential candidate a few years ago - someone who would have been so competent and responsible- don't be taken in by Mitch Daniels so called 'charisma'. He would be a disaster.
February 20 2011 at 7:14 AM Report abuse Permalink +10 rate up rate down ReplyAs a fellow Hoosier, I agree. But, don't worry there are MANY more issues that he and his family don't care to have exposed. I don't even think he'll run. If he does, he won't win. Trust me. If he does, his wife will divorce him. Again.
February 20 2011 at 8:07 AM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down Reply"Dukakis had mentioned both ideas in a descriptive summary of what he said Americans had a right to expect from their leaders: Competence, job creation, opportunity, and "American values. Old fashioned values like accountability and responsibility and respect for the truth."
By that measure, Obama is batting 0 for his term so far. More jobs have been lost since Nancy Pelosi became Speaker in 2007 than were lost in the Great Depression. Look it up.
Follow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
17 Comments