Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker Has a Choice: Union Buster or Real Leader?

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Quick, which new Republican governor said earnestly in a campaign ad last year, "Real leadership means bringing people together to solve problems"? That would be Wisconsin's Scott Walker, whose plan to sharply curtail bargaining and political rights for unions has set off daily mass protests in Madison, an exodus of Democratic state lawmakers to Illinois, and broad questions about the future of organized labor.

Give Walker credit for taking a cue from President Barack Obama and not letting a crisis go to waste. Confronted with the Great Recession, Obama used that crisis to pursue some of his top goals. Walker is faced with a $3.6 billion budget deficit and is doing likewise. Conservatives, beyond thrilled, say turnabout is fair play. "Elections have consequences! LOL," as one newspaper commenter wrote.

Obama signed a stimulus law laden with his priorities: high-speed rail, high-speed Internet, energy conservation, renewable energy, education reforms. He crammed a lot of his 2008 campaign platform – things he talked about incessantly as needed for future prosperity -- into that $800 billion package.

Is that what Walker is doing? Trying to do what he told voters he'd do? I'm not so sure.

Byron Shafer, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, said in an e-mail that "the present conflict seems very straightforward" because Walker's theme throughout the campaign was that "public-sector workers are now making more than private-sector workers, while having less competition and more security -- and that the state budget would never get fixed if this were not fixed."

And Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Sunday on NBC's "Meet The Press" that Walker specifically put "renegotiating and reforming collective bargaining" on the table during his campaign. Graham even held out a campaign flyer in which "Wisconsin unions said if you elect this guy Scott Walker, he's going to reform or limit collective bargaining."

Yet it's hard to find evidence of Walker's intentions in his ads, on his campaign website, in write-ups of debates, anywhere. It is safe to say that he didn't focus his campaign on "taking decades of union law and throwing it out the window and trying to bust the unions altogether," as Democratic state Sen. Jon Erpenbach – one of the exiles trying to prevent action on Walker's bill -- put it Monday on the CBS "Early Show."

The details came in a Feb. 11 letter from Walker to state employees. Bargaining would be limited to base pay (no bargaining over benefits). Contracts would be limited to one year. Unions would have to take annual votes to keep their certification as unions. Employers would be barred from collecting dues and members would not be required to pay them. "Local police and fire employees and State Patrol Troopers and Inspectors are exempted from these changes," Walker wrote.

Walker's bill also would require public employees to contribute more to their health insurance and pension funds. He talked about that often during his campaign and he's now getting no argument on it. "Money issues are off the table," Mary Bell, president of the Wisconsin Education Association Council, said Sunday. "Public employees have agreed to Governor Walker's pension and health care concessions, which he says will solve the budget challenge."

The clash, therefore, is no longer about cash. At this point, with a Republican House and GOP governors looking to Walker and Wisconsin to show them the way, it is about the survival of unions as an economic and political force.

Walker said Monday on MSNBC that he is not comfortable being called a union buster (interviewer Chuck Todd's phrase) because "in the end what I am is, I'm a budget balancer." It was a typical segue, or conflation, or perhaps evasion. Throughout the interview, asked repeatedly about his bargaining, dues and certification proposals, Walker usually responded by talking about the need to cut pension and health costs – which union members already have agreed to do.

Asked specifically about exemptions for the unions that backed him, Walker called that a bogus issue because only four of 314 police and fire unions supported him. Voters might have gotten a different impression, however, from a TV ad that featured leaders of Milwaukee police and firefighter unions criticizing Walker's Democratic opponent, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett. "The union members that work for Barrett now support Scott Walker," a narrator says.

Judging by that ad and others, some voters may have thought they were electing a compassionately conservative, consensus-building union sympathizer. What is perhaps surprising, given the leadership image Walker tried to project in the campaign, is the hardness of the conflict (Barrett said Monday that Walker has ignited an "ideological war") and Walker's unwillingness to compromise.

On Monday he rejected a Republican state senator's proposal to curtail collective bargaining for two years rather than permanently, see how it plays out and have a longer discussion. "Short-term fixes are why we're in this trouble," Walker said on MSNBC. "We're passing the buck on if we don't make long-term sustainable changes."

Walker's appetite for conflict is triggering concerns from a wide range of people and groups. Jennifer Alexander, president of the Greater Madison Chamber of Commerce, said the chamber does not support "the adversarial way" elected officials are approaching the deficit problem. "Given this state's long history of collective bargaining, policy changes of this magnitude should be thoroughly debated for an adequate period of time, in good faith by both sides, with all potential consequences considered. Currently, that is not happening," she said in a statement.

Tracy Fuller, executive board president of the Wisconsin Law Enforcement Association, went public last week with multiple regrets. "I specifically regret the endorsement of the Wisconsin Troopers' Association for Governor Scott Walker," he said. "I regret the governor's decision to 'endorse' the troopers and inspectors of the Wisconsin State Patrol. I regret being the recipient of any of the perceived benefits provided by the governor's anointing." Later, with his regrets on record, he said he was not authorized to speak for the troopers' association and removed the statement.

Even before Walker launched what Obama said seems like an "assault" on unions, they were in decline. It seems strange to be worrying about the very existence of unions – the engine that built the middle class -- in the context of rampant joblessness, decades of income stagnation and increasingly vast concentrations of wealth at the top.

This is not an argument for unions to be shielded against "shared sacrifice" during a miserable recession. It is, however, an argument for Walker to show "real leadership" as he defined it in his campaign.

Follow Jill Lawrence on Facebook and Twitter

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

208 Comments

Filter by:
billrenaud77

Its hard to believe what Walker is doing is "democracy in action"as mentioned earlier. It seems anything but. I do feel unions had grown to powerful over the years but that power has eroded. They have agreed to the concessions Walker wanted but he is adamant that is not enough, that collective bargaining must be eliminated. Now the pendulum is swinging to hard the other way. Walker is talking about total control. Very Scary, Some on here need a history lesson, that is why the unions fought the way they did in the 20s and 30s as we were becoming a have and have not society. With the union interference the middle class was born and our society developed a better standard of living for the majority. So many on here dont seem to realize that the fact their own parents paid for their education and middle class lifestyle due to the unions accomplishments. Guess we will move towards the haves and the have nots. So many are blind to this till its too late, Walmart will love to pay you 8.00 and hour so the big boys at the top and the politicians can live in luxury. Their are achieveing their goal and controlling both the work enviroment and the political landscape.

February 28 2011 at 12:41 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
mpd2550

proper action is to eliminate public employees union, and match same benefits of the private sector,only way to reduce corruption,end of been supported by the tax payers.

February 28 2011 at 10:28 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
gnajac

I hope all the officials who are pushing for the union reforms and changes in health benefits for state workers are going to include themselves to the exact same changes.

February 27 2011 at 10:24 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
inasctg56

Former Governor Granholm (D) of Michigan just stated that when bargaining in Michigan, it was union workers who came up with over a billion in savings from contractors. Teachers and police officers do the same in bargaining. They are part of the solution - not the problem.

February 26 2011 at 11:32 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
inasctg56

In the governor's phone conversation he mentioned planting troublemakers in the crowd, he acknowledged encouraging other states to bust unions, and is looking forward to spending time with Koch in California. Could Koch be the no bid beneficiary of the legislation that was just passed? A red flag should come up when no bid contracts come up - look how halliburton stole millions from taxpayers from the no bid contracts they received under Bush/Cheney in Iraq. More of the same failed Bush/gop policies.

February 26 2011 at 11:29 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
joe

The labor unions support the Democrats . In turn the Democrat politicians install the labor unions in the government employment systems. The unions collect dues and the money is used to elect Demcratic Party candidates. Now the politicians in charge are Republicans. Even in the absence of a budget crisis the Republicans would have a legitimate cause to rid the state of Wisconsin of labor unions in government jobs.

February 23 2011 at 12:31 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
Jesse

Actually, this is what makes him a "real leader". Not afraid to make the tough decisions. Not trying to bust a union, just trying to make negotiating fair when it comes to public unions. Just ask General Motors how well giving the unions everything they wanted for so many years what that got them. Should have let them go bankrupt, instead, we bail them out, for what??? They brought in on themselves.

February 23 2011 at 2:11 AM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
jdac18

This is the first intelligent piece I have read on the crisis Gov. Walker created here in Wisconsin. He has no interest in talking with anyone about anything, those are his words.

February 22 2011 at 10:47 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
phanntom

There has never been a need for public employee unions. They've been covered by civil service laws, and while even in the private sector, with all the laws protecting workers they've become passe'.

This isn't an issue that is in the hearts and minds of the general population, in fact, if it weren't for the Rent A Rioter program the unions use to make the crowds look large for the media, there wouldn't even be anyone there but a few union members.

Currently, unions only make up about 7% of workers, 13% when you add in public employees. The unions have made their own beds. In the private sector they've caused the very products they make to become uncompetitive, and in the public sector have created unsustainable costs. As was prominently headlined on one of the CA public employee union websites..."We Hire Our Bosses". That line, in and of itself tells why public employees shouldn't have collective bargining. They control the Democrat legislators thereby controlling the process, and THAT'S where it becomes unfair to taxpayers.

I don't know a single person personally, that feels any sympathy for the public employee unions.

February 22 2011 at 10:47 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to phanntom's comment
pdiablo06

I agree. The purpose of a union is to consolidate resources and labor to negotiate fair compensation and acceptable working conditions. Government agencies already have bureaucracies in place that evaluate employee compensation. If the public feels the bureaucracy is undervaluing them, then that agency needs to be privatized (which would allow them to unionize effectively). This is precisely why the fire and police department haven't been asked to weaken their unions: their jobs can't be privatized practically, so Governor Walker is stuck with the system he's got.

February 23 2011 at 12:17 PM Report abuse -6 rate up rate down Reply
pmbalele

I love Scott Walker. But I am sorry he has spoilt future of GOP. Republican WH bid has been pre-empted by Scott Walker. American people, including TEA Partiers, now regret they campaigned and voted for Walker in Wisconsin. There were 70,000 people picketing against Walker last week. Say if each of these 70,000 people have 10 relatives, you are talking about 700,000 that hate Walker and republicans as whole. Indeed I met a few people who had joined the TEA Party picketing at Wisconsin capital. I asked them if they remembered what I had blogged. They now regret voting republican. American people will never again elect republican as lawmakers or leaders. Republicans are finished. American people now fear republicans. On the other hand Walker is confusing me. His actions show that he wants socialism in Wisconsin. That's all people should be paid and have same benefits regardless of work they do. That means if you went to college and say you have MS or PhD you should be paid and have same benefits as one who finished high school working at a department store. In China and communist countries people have same pay and benefits regardless education or work backgrounds. America is land of opportunity. You work hard and you're rewarded for your hard work. These teachers, police officers, nurses, fire fighters, professors, and medical professionals invested in education more than we who finished high school and are working in factories or department stores. I do not think we should claim to be paid and have same benefits as those who invested in higher education. If Republicans enact laws that everybody should have same benefits then they are secretly injecting socialism in this country. What further surprises me is that Wisconsin governor and his attorney-general do not want to implement the federal Affordable Heath Care law. The law would have reduced cost of health services in Wisconsin. They call it socialism. Is that not hypocrisy when same people want everybody to have the same pay and benefits in Wisconsin. I am sorry for any republican now planning for WH bid. Those plans are now DOA for republicans.

February 22 2011 at 10:40 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>