Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Poland in 1980 and Wisconsin in 2011: History Rhymes

4 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Mentioning the campaign against unions by a Republican governor in 2011 in the same breath as the anti-labor repression by Communist authorities in Poland in 1980 is sure to raise eyebrows. Yet as Mark Twain supposedly said, if history doesn't repeat itself, it sometimes rhymes.

And there are some striking similarities between that Communist-era episode and the ongoing standoff between Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and the state's public employees. They were not lost on the current president of the Solidarity trade union in Poland, who sent a letter of support for public workers on behalf of the union's 700,000 members.

"We are witnessing yet another attempt of transferring the costs of the economic crisis and of the failed financial policies to working people and their families," wrote Piotr Duda, president of Solidarnosc, the Polish word for Solidarity. "Your victory is our victory as well."

Indeed, both in Communist Poland and in Wisconsin today, the target was unions and their collective bargaining rights. And in both cases, we see the Roman Catholic Church supporting organized labor.

Led by the gutsy electrician Lech Walesa, workers of the Solidarity trade union movement went on strike in August 1980 to regain their freedom and their rights. Over 18 days, they negotiated with Communist party officials, who were actually more willing to make concessions than Walker has been to this point.

The governor is obviously not a Communist. His pro-business credentials are undeniable, as evidenced by his cozy relationship with the billionaire Koch brothers and his corporate tax cuts (which are arguably a cause of Wisconsin's fiscal crisis). Yet, he sure is acting like the Polish Communists in one real way: they, too, staunchly opposed free trade unions and collective bargaining.

Walesa and other Solidarity leaders did not relent. They insisted that free trade unions and the right to collective bargaining were absolutely essential to guaranteeing freedom in Poland. Yes, they wanted wages that would feed their families. Yes, they wanted to work in safe conditions. But above all they wanted a voice in assuring the dignity of work. "Everything else would follow," argued Walesa.

According to Timothy Garton Ash's eyewitness account in "The Polish Revolution," when it was all over Walesa told the throngs of workers "we now have the most important thing: Our Independent Self-Governing Trades Unions. That is our guarantee for the future." The workers in Wisconsin are on the same page: they are willing to concede economic benefits, but they will not budge on their right to collective bargaining.

In its steadfast demands, Solidarity had a strong and venerable ally: the Catholic Church. Labor rights had been a pillar of Catholic social teaching since the 19th century, and Cardinal Karol Wojtyla of Krakow and the Primate of Poland, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski, had for decades proclaimed the church's support for a broad human rights agenda, including the rights of workers.

Wojtyla was elected Pope John Paul II in 1978, two years before Walesa led the Gdansk strike, and the pontiff's 1981 encyclical on human labor, "Laborem Exercens" -- published while Poland's internal struggle was growing -- buoyed Solidarity's case for independent unions. In the pontiff's words, workers have the "right ... to form associations for the purpose of defending the vital interests of those employed in various professions."

Moreover, the pontiff declared unions are a "mouthpiece for the struggle for social justice, for the just rights of working people." The Polish government wanted to keep this mouthpiece silent. Likewise, Walker is attempting to squelch the voice of workers by eviscerating unions' primary purpose: negotiation of wages and benefits. He also wants to break their backs by forcing unions to hold annual recertification votes and to collect membership dues outside of payroll deductions.

Just as the church leaders stood up for Solidarity, Archbishop Jerome Listecki of Milwaukee has raised his voice. In a recent statement, he quoted Pope Benedict XVI, who has argued that unions are more necessary than ever in the global economy, especially given the tendency of governments to limit the "negotiating capacity" of workers in the name of "economic utility."

Listecki also cited John Paul II's positive appraisal of the role that unions play in promoting social justice and the common good. The archbishop exhorted his fellow citizens to realize that "hard times do not nullify the moral obligation each of us has to respect the legitimate rights of workers" and that it is wrong to "marginalize or dismiss unions as impediments to economic growth."

He echoed what the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote long ago, namely that economic decisions must not take place over the heads of workers whose livelihoods depend on them. On Thursday, the point man on social justice issues for the American hierarchy, Bishop Stephen Blaire of Stockton, also reiterated that point in a letter to Listecki expressing "support for and solidarity" with the statement of the Wisconsin bishops.

"Catholic teaching and your statement remind us these are not just political conflicts or economic choices; they are moral choices with enormous human dimensions," Bishop Blaire wrote. "The debates over worker representation and collective bargaining are not simply matters of ideology or power, but involve principles of justice, participation and how workers can have a voice in the workplace and economy."

Such words could have easily come from the Polish bishops, who unequivocally supported Solidarity's bid for workers' rights.

Moreover, diverse faith traditions share this insistence on the rights and dignity of workers. That was evidenced by the support for workers coming from Jewish leaders and the decision by religious leaders in Wisconsin and Illinois to offer their houses of worship as sanctuaries for Democratic state senators who walked out of the legislature last week to block a vote on Walker's proposal to roll back collective bargaining rights for public employees.

The Wisconsin governor is acting against the best impulses of democracy. The right to participate in discussions about wages and benefits is vital for a truly democratic and free-market system. As Pope John Paul II stated, a democracy that fosters the common good, "requires the effective exercise, even in the economic sphere, of the right of all people to share in the decisions which affect them." A "free economy" needs legal structures and institutions such as unions to ensure "equality between the parties" so that "one party would not be so powerful as practically to reduce the other to subservience."

The right to unions and collective bargaining is also necessary for human freedom. As both the Solidarity movement and Catholic social teaching have attested, freedom is fulfilled by participating in the construction of a just society. Unions safeguard workers' ability to function in this capacity.

Perhaps progressives and the tea party could find agreement in opposition to the fact that Gov. Walker would give government more coercive power and encroach on workers' ability to freely sell services in the marketplace. Union demands are not always justifiable, and sometimes workers must sacrifice a portion of their own livelihoods for the sake of the common good. But taking away their freedom is never acceptable. It is unethical, undemocratic, and un-American.

I'm certain the Polish freedom fighters who threw off the yoke of Communism would agree. Their motto was "no freedom without solidarity."

In spite of the dangerous precedent set by Gov. Walker's obstinacy -- other states are weighing similar anti-union legislation -- we can take heart in the solidarity between Wisconsin workers, student protesters and religious leaders – another parallel between Poland in 1980 and now. Perhaps like the Communist party officials in Poland, Walker may be unwittingly galvanizing an unstoppable alliance. A recent poll revealed that a clear majority of Americans oppose his attack on unions. When the dust clears, we may be indebted to him for our own era of solidarity.

Gerald J. Beyer is author of "Recovering Solidarity: Lessons From Poland's Unfinished Revolution" (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010). He is associate professor of Christian social ethics at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:

7 Years ago Cal voters recalled Governor Grey Davis 1 year after starting his second term. A stateside petition resulted in a special election, and Davis was voted OUT!

MADISON = 100,000 protestors x 10 supporters each = 1 million signatures. Maybe enuf for a special election. Is it time to vote King Walker out? Pls get this in the hands of unions, etc who can get the ball rolling.

Thank u for all u do for the middle class.

March 04 2011 at 8:09 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

I am a UNION employee. I am NOT the problem. We are NOT the enemy. If you're jealous of our benefits FIGHT for your own. Not against ours. The RICH who CREATED this crisis are putting middle class families against each other. We LIVE here, PAY taxes & WORK HARD to support our families!

February 27 2011 at 6:03 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to alifed2000's comment

If you are a private sector union member, I agree for the most part. If you are a public servant, I disagree: no rate of taxation, even 100 could raise a dime of net new taxes from a public servant as all of his/her salary had to first come out of private industry as taxes.

February 28 2011 at 6:46 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply

Unions and their bargaining rights are the backbone of the middle class. Their efforts have raised the standard of living of all the working people. We should all be thinking how can the workers in all industries should organize so the middle class do not continue to disappear in this country. The working and middle class people need to work together in stopping the assault on their livelihood.

February 27 2011 at 5:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

public unions do not become in government period. It undermines it.

February 26 2011 at 4:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I believe the labor movement is failing to adequately educate the people on the history of the labor movement and what life looked like for us before the advent of unions. The current generations to not have enough information to understand that history is once again repeating itself with all the implications of the human suffering of life without representation.

February 26 2011 at 7:15 AM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
3 replies to thewebdoctorisin's comment

The biggest hit the unions took was when Clinton put NAFTA into effect.

February 26 2011 at 6:35 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

FDR was against public unions. We have JFK to that for that.

February 26 2011 at 1:46 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to sgerlyn's comment

Wrong, FDR supported unions.

February 26 2011 at 10:30 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

FDR did support unions in the private sector but opposed them in the public sector. He claimed giving public unions collectibe bargaining rights would harm the country, making it more expensive and difficult to run. Look it up!

February 26 2011 at 11:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

How ridiculously far left wing can you get? AOL this should even make you ashamed!This comparison between Wisconsin and Poland is so far fetched and delusional that that it should really be classified as Communist propaganda and not journalism.

February 26 2011 at 1:20 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

This is an absolute lie, the Catholic Church does not support the union's power grab, nor the unionization of the public sector employees, who in no way need to be unionized since they work directly for the government who guarantees their wages and safety.
The Catholic Church supports collective bargaining more so in the private sector where abuses to employees in past ages were more likely to happen. Times have changed, however, and hence the Church does not support unionization for its own sake, especially in America where unions are nothing more than dues extracting machines, which they then use to support politicans (regardless of their moral views, especially those the CC considers essential, like respect for human life) who will be beholden to them and continue to give them power and access to the employees wages.

February 26 2011 at 12:44 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply

This is nothing more than SPIN, with a capital S from whoever the author of this piece is. Nothing could be further from the truth than the attempted connection between Solidarity and the cheeshead rebellion this guy is trying to force.
Two completely different motivations, evolution and end game between the two!
Solidarity was a movement for freedom from communist control from the Russian jackboot that had oppressed Poland for decades, but mainly its members sought RELIGIOUS freedom. The success and final outcome was ultimately facilitated by the help of Karol Woytila, or JP II, the past Pope without whose help NOTHING would have happened, no matter how brave Walesa was.

The cheeshead rebellion is nothing more than a power play by quasi(or even obvertly) communist manipulated unions, who are seeing their influence in the public sector threatened and will be DAMNED if they let it go without agitating.
American unions are in fact the exact the opposite of Solidarity, and any comparison is not only false but OFFENSIVE to Solidarity itself, and to anyone who has a modicum of brain. We know history, the author is nothing more than a revisionist.

February 26 2011 at 12:05 AM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>