Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Roger Ailes' Sex-and-Lies Tale: There Is Something Different About Fox

4 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
If a television anchor were caught -- on tape! -- encouraging a colleague to lie to federal investigators in order to protect a high-profile friend, do you think he or she would still have a job? Probably not. But if you run a network and if it's Fox, well, then . . .

On Thursday, The New York Times broke one of those deliciously dishy New York political-media exposés involving bold-face names. According to legal papers filed in a civil suit, in 2004 Roger Ailes, the pugilistic head of Fox News, encouraged Judith Regan, a flashy publisher, to lie to federal investigators about an affair she had had with Bernard Kerik, the former NYC police chief nominated by George W. Bush to be the secretary of homeland security. Ailes' motive: to protect Rudolph Giuliani, a close pal of Ailes' and a mentor and supporter of Kerik. Giuliani was at that time looking toward a presidential run in 2008, and any scandal involving Kerik, his close associate, would be bad news for him.

In 2006, after she was fired by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., which owns Fox News, Regan (who had proposed publishing O.J. Simpson's hypothetical confession of the murder of his ex-wife) publicly claimed that a senior exec at News Corp. had asked her to lie about her affair with Kerik, who was married. (Reportedly, Kerik and Regan used an apartment near Ground Zero -- which had been donated for recovery and rescue workers -- as their love nest.) But Regan did not ID the News Corp. honcho who had encouraged her to hush up. In a lawsuit filed against News Corp. in 2007, Regan said this executive had told her that if she disclosed information about her tryst with Kerik, it "would harm Giuliani's presidential campaign."

There's more to this twisted tale -- including accusations of anti-Semitism, a $10.75 million settlement for Regan, a novel that portrayed baseball great Mickey Mantle as a lascivious drunk, and Kerik's indictment on tax fraud and other charges. (Kerik was sent to the slammer last year.) But let's keep the focus on Ailes. The Times scoop, based on legal filings in a case in which Regan's former lawyers are suing her for not paying them (oy!), reveals that Regan taped the phone call during which Ailes pushed her to lie to the feds about a sexual matter.

This tape is Ailes' blue dress.

Fox News, founded in 1996, went to town during the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal and subsequent impeachment crusade. That saga made Ailes' network. I doubt anyone kept track, but there must have been at least 17 million occasions when a Fox host or guest said that lying about sex in a legal proceeding (to prevent political embarrassment) was a high crime deserving impeachment -- or worse.

Yet that's what Ailes encouraged Regan to do. And this might have been illegal: conspiring to lie to federal gumshoes is a crime. But prosecutors don't usually bother with such cases. (Remember all those high-minded Fox Newsers who fiercely dismissed the argument that Clinton ought not be prosecuted or impeached for this sort of lie because prosecutors rarely chased after this kind of perjury case?)

Crime or not, Ailes did wrong. Last fall, he told the Daily Beast that it is important to maintain "the appearance of integrity" at a news network. (He was referring to MSNBC's recent suspension of Keith Olbermann for making donations to candidates.) But there's little integrity in a news exec leaning on a witness in a federal investigation -- especially when it's to help a presidential candidate who a few years earlier had used his political muscle to help that news exec get his channel carried on New York City's main cable system. The levels of improbity in this story are many.

I know Ailes. I worked at Fox for several years as a commentator. (If only I could tell you the conversations I heard in the make-up room!) Ailes was a decent boss, always straightforward with me and eager for a good argument. Once we were arguing before the Iraq war about the invasion to come, and I said that intelligence reports indicated that al-Qaeda was present in 65 countries. "Good," he said, "after Iraq, it will be one down and 64 to go." Ailes clearly knows that his whole fair-and-balanced shtick is a clever (and profitable) gimmick designed to make conservative shut-ins believe they are the real mainstream.

Ailes also must know now that he's been nabbed -- and compromised. He encouraged a cover-up (possibly a criminal act) to help Giuliani. And it would not be surprising, given that this episode was a central part of the dramatic legal battle between Regan and News Corp., that Murdoch was aware of it. (Regan's lawsuit against News Corp. declared that several executives in the company knew of Ailes' conversation with her.) Yet Ailes and News Corp. kept the lid on this for years, and now, I expect, they're going to pretend that lid is still there. In any other media empire, a top executive who had acted in this manner -- and who had been exposed -- would be deleted. But a spokeswoman for News Corp. told the Times, "The matter is closed."

Ailes and Murdoch contend that Fox News is a legitimate cable network, like any other (just more profitable!), that it deserves to be treated fairly by the Obama White House and be seen as reliable news provider. But it's hard to believe that the heads of CNN, MSNBC, NBC News, CBS News, or ABC News could get away with shenanigans that reveal such hypocrisy and fierce political favoritism. This sordid affair shows that, yes, there is something different about Fox.

You can follow David Corn's postings and media appearances via Twitter.
Filed Under: Deep Background

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:

So David, I assume you heard the tape and that the language Ailes used explicitly suggests that Judith should "lie" to federal investigators. Perhaps you should wait until you have an actual transcript before making such allegations. Further the "appearance of integrity" has nothing to do with actual integrity, of which little exists in political discourse as well as right/left journalism broadcast journalism.

Also, I find it contradictory that from your own experience "Ailes was a decent boss, always straightforward with me" you would still assume that he lacks integrity. Did you call him before you trashed him? I would think that such an idealist like yourself would give a man the same respect he afforded you.

And lastly, give me a break. If you have "political muscle" you will use it to achieve your political goals, right of left. Everybody in the big game has powerful friends; that's the way it's always been and I would bet that it's the way it will always be.

February 28 2011 at 3:03 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply


February 25 2011 at 4:51 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jbarbwire's comment
Just Steve

Wait -- what is not unbiased about this commentary? He's discussing something reported in the NY Times about Ailes, on tape, encouraging someone else to lie to federal investigators about a crime. So, because its FOX we should ignore it? Somehow he didn't mean to break the law, so its fine?

But I get it... these folks can do no wrong in your eyes.

February 26 2011 at 8:03 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply

"But it's hard to believe that the heads of CNN, MSNBC, NBC News, CBS News, or ABC News could get away with shenanigans that reveal such hypocrisy and fierce political favoritism." You've got to be kidding me, Mr. Corn. Everyone of these stations and their fierce political favoritism is what got Obama elected!

February 25 2011 at 3:01 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

As we have heard repeatedly from the protesters in Wisconsin, "FOX LIES". Apparently this willingness to abandon the truth in pursuit of an extreme right wing agenda has the implicit approval of Roger Ailes. FOX NEWS continues to lose credibility and its' 'fair and balanced' mantra is totally absurd.

February 25 2011 at 12:15 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

One problem with your Clinton reference: neither person referred to in your article is an elected public official. Also, neither has been proven to have lied under oath, at least according to what you wrote here. Further, the possible conduct of Mr. Ailes does not prove either bias or misbehavior at FOX. So, while comparing apples and oranges, you still failed to connect the dots. Go back and try again.

February 25 2011 at 11:29 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to trb2244's comment

It is called suborning perjury and it is a felony. So, you go back and try again.

February 25 2011 at 12:54 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Tausands: I did. Here in the People's Republic of Maryland making that tape would be a felony. Where's the proof?

February 28 2011 at 10:22 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>