AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
I didn't get out there, and I haven't yet heard reports that Tina Fey or Alec Baldwin joined the protesters, but I'm sure as members in good standing of SAG, we were all there in spirit. And I thought of someone else I suspect would be standing up for collective bargaining, and that's former SAG President Ronald Reagan. Republicans cheering Gov. Scott Walker's unyielding stance against Wisconsin's public employee unions overlook Reagan's activism as a union president, citing only his firing of striking air traffic controllers as president. Walker and other GOP governors hold up that decision as their model in the current confrontation with organized labor.Unions are not what they were when Reagan was their president. If he saw what they have turned into and what they are being allowed to do to this country, all for the sake of Democratic votes and money, he would be on the other side. That man cared about this country, something the unions do not!!
February 28 2011 at 9:52 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThere is no such thing as a right to collective bargaining for federal gov't employees. There is a set pay scale and set benefits and that is it, take it or leave it. This is a free country and nobody is forced to work a job they think is not in their best interest. Same should go for state and local gov't employees.
February 28 2011 at 6:45 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyI seriously doubt Ronald Reagan would support the public-sector unions. It's is collusion at its very worst when American tax-payers have to fund government union coffers who then donate to the democratic party, who then "bargains" with the unions for entitlements in exchange for votes. It's sickening. Nor do I think Ronald Reagan would support forcing individuals to join a union and have dues collected from their earnings every month just to get a job serving their government. Why do government workers even need a union? Do they think the government will reintroduce sweat shops and 14-hour work days? Of course not. Contrary to private sector unions, who KNOW they have to protect the bottom line or the company will go out of business, public sector unions have no such concern. They can just get their buddies in washington to raise taxes in order to provide more entitlemets. It's really kind of criminal to the tax payers of America who are the employers - yet have no voice at the bargaining table.
February 28 2011 at 6:38 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
3 Comments