AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
While some feminists chafed at Portman's use of the superlative, and wondered whether reproducing is truly "the greatest thing Natalie Portman will do with her life?" my colleague Joanne Bamberger countered, "the experience of motherhood adds, not subtracts, from the full picture of being an accomplished woman."Mike Huckabee's comments on Natalie Portman's pregnancy are unwarranted and absurd. Portman is 29-years-old, Harvard educated, successful, and most importantly (to Huckabee's argument) engaged to her baby's father. It seems a bit hypocritical that Huck would slam Portman's choice to carry her pregnancy to term, and be a mother, rather than take other options he has built a platform around condemning.
And what about Huckabee's comments praising Bristol Palin and her family in such a "tough time" during the 08 elections? Palin was/is an unwed, uneducated teenage mother who is not with the baby's father and uses her "experience" as a take-off point for her career. Maybe the Huckster should look at condemning Bristol for exploiting her pregnancy, and her child, to gain an extra buck. Huckabee may as well take a look at Levi Johnston for being a dead-beat dad and splitting on his son's mother.
At least for Natalie and her fiance Benjamin, they are both successful in their own rights, and will provide for their child, without having to go on "Dancing With the Stars." Huckabee needs to move out of the 1950s, and into the new millenium. Divorce rates are settling around 50%, so would it really matter if Natalie and Benjamin got married or not?
Bottom line, look at everything else Natalie Portman has accomplished in her life. She's successful, ivy-league educated, a published scientist, a world ambassador for FINCA, an outspoken activist, and soon enough a mother. She should be praised for these things, instead of slammed for not having the "ideal" pregnancy in the eyes of a conservative, evangelical Governor from Arkansas.
You actually make some good points, but MISS the main one. It would have taken Portman & her baby's father just a few hours TO GET MARRIED. Even before their baby's conception, when they were obviously committing adultery, which has been a crime ALL through human history, EVEN in America, & EVEN in NY State, until 1976, if memory serves, just after I was dating the widowed NY Gov. Hugh Carey's oldest child of 12, Randy, in 1968 (without committing adultery, I must say!). Adultery, by BOTH parties, and of BOTH kinds, hetero- & homo-sexual, was a death penalty offense in Ancient Israel. A key point which Goldstein NEVER mentions.
March 09 2011 at 9:31 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHuckabee was not critcizing the baby only the self centerded girl. Most unwed mothers can barely afford to look after themselves, let alone a child. This unwed mother doesn't have that to worry about. I still feel sorry for the baby and I still find it a sticky situation as the kid grows up around intact families. They do question sometimes and how they percieve these things is not the same for everyone. Some get positive results and others not so.
Kids grow up more secure with both, mom and dad.
Yes, Natalie Portman lives in a free country and can have all of the out-of-wedlock babies that she wants. That's not the issue. The issue is that having a child out of wedlock is not ideal for the child; children are best raised in a home that contains both parents. Goldstein's attempt to recast Huckabee's remarks as somehow picking on the unborn child is dishonest. Portman is in the public eye and it is important that someone remind young people that Portman's choice was not the best and should not be purposely emulated -- for the sake of the unborn children.
March 07 2011 at 1:14 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyAnyone who would parade their private dalliances in such a public venue should expect comments, good, bad, or indifferent.
March 06 2011 at 9:47 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyNatalie Portman is a fine actress who obviously has her moral compass screwed up! This is a simple example of another Hollywood star who believes that they can do what they want - no matter what the established morals are. Makes me sick to think what message this sends to our young adults.
March 06 2011 at 6:41 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyNatalie Portman is 29 years old, an adult, established in her career and engaged to the father of her child. Her situation is not the same as a young high school girl who hasn't even graduated from high school, is still a child herself in many respects, and will need lots of help from her family in order to raise a baby. I can't see young girls identifying with her exactly. They are much more likely to be influenced by peers and family than an actress. I think Mr. Huckabee has every right to be concerned about teenage pregnancy but his argument is side tracked somewhat by the example he chose. Parenting is not for the faint of heart, and it's for life. You can divorce your spouse, if need be, but not your kids. It is the biggest responsibility you will ever undertake and we need to do a better job of communicating that to young girls and boys.
March 06 2011 at 3:50 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyI think Hukabee's comments are valid. Most children born to unwed mothers have been proven to suceed less in life than their contemporaries. The very reasons given extolling Natalie Portman, (a beautiful, intelligent, inspiring talent) should cause her to be even more of a role model for young, aspiring, women. For her to allow herself to be impregnated shows a definate lack of respect for herself and for her admirers. What's wrong with marriage?
March 06 2011 at 3:34 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyNote to Ms. Goldstein: Where were you when david letterman made the comment about Sara Palin's daughter? Where were you when tucker carlson made his nasty comment about Sara Palin? Mike HUckabee's comment were mild compared to theirs.
March 06 2011 at 2:31 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyLetterman is a comedian, albeit a bad one. And there has never been any excuse for Tucker Carlson and his bowtie.
March 06 2011 at 5:51 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhat I did not get about Mike Huckabee's comments: it seemed as though he was condemning Miss Portman for having the child and would have condoned terminating the pregnancy.... as the lesser of two evils I just don't get Mike Huckabee.
March 06 2011 at 7:51 AM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyThis occurred to me as well. Natalie Portman is doing everything "right" by conservative standards--carrying the unplanned pregnancy to term, marrying the baby's father--and yet she is something to be denounced?!
Mike Huckabee needs to get over the fact that he does not, indeed, have control over the bodies of women and cannot, therefore, prevent them from living their own lives. At least he has made clear what this is really about--a denunciation of the sexuality of unmarried women.
Which, of course, is what it has always been, and which is why conservatives declare war on contraception whilst professing to despise abortion and claiming to want to prevent it at all costs.
Hypocrites, plain and simple.
You need to spend a little more time listening and analyzing, before commenting.
March 06 2011 at 9:49 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHey Huckabee keep it up.For one your right Portman should not be having kids out of wedlock.This is a terrible example for anyone.
March 06 2011 at 6:31 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplySo she should have done...what exactly? Terminate the pregnancy?
March 06 2011 at 5:05 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
29 Comments