Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Public Support for Gay Marriage on Verge of Surpassing Opposition

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Gay marriage is continuing to gain acceptance among the public -- the latest survey from the Pew Research Center shows Americans almost evenly split between those who oppose and those who support same-sex marriage.

According to the poll, conducted during the last week of February, 45 percent of Americans say gays and lesbians should be allowed to marry, up from 37 percent in 2009 (and just 27 percent in 1996) while 46 percent oppose same-sex marriage, down from 54 percent two years ago, and down from a 65 percent disapproval rate in 1996.

Partisan differences remain stark, with 57 percent of Democrats and 51 percent of independents backing gay marriage. Only one in four Republicans support the right of gays to marry, but that is up from 15 percent in 1996.

Newly released data from the General Social Surveys (GSS) shows an even more striking shift, with a solid majority of 46 percent supporting gay marriage and just 40 percent in opposition.

As Charles Franklin notes at the Huffington Post, recent polls on same-sex marriage show approval for for civil unions, which was once considered by many to be the "safe alternative" to gay marriage, has remained flat while support for same-sex marriage itself has surged. And the rise is occurring not only among younger Americans.

"The trends here show that opposition to gay marriage is becoming a less and less acceptable position through the public more generally," Franklin writes. "It is not merely the young who are shifting views. While individual states are certain to vary widely in the balance of public opinion, the national shift is so striking and so regular that it is hard to imagine this issue will remain in doubt for much longer."

The latest shift is especially notable in that it comes as social conservatives have drawn a line in the sand against gay marriage, and just after President Obama announced his administration would no longer argue in court on behalf of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman.

But Republicans are ascendant in Washington and in statehouses across the country. And pollsters note that the public often reacts to shifts in political power by backing issues of the party that is perceived to be losing influence, preferring that lawmakers not go too far one way, especially on uncomfortable and polarizing issues like gay marriage and abortion.

In fact, support for legal abortion dropped from 55 percent to 47 percent in the first year of Obama's term, perhaps reflecting concerns that he would move too far too fast in liberalizing abortion rights. Support for abortion rights had since rebounded, the recent Pew survey shows, to 54 percent -- again a possible backlash against the GOP's sweeping takeover of the U.S. House in January and the Republican decision to make curtailing abortion rights and funding its top priority.

Social conservatives can take some solace in the fact that the degree of support for the anti-abortion position has remained relatively stable.

But the trend lines on gay marriage do not bode well for the conservative cause, and as Politics Daily reported, the relatively low-key Republican response to Obama's DOMA decision suggested that waning public backing is going to translate into diminishing political clout.

Indeed, Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, told Focus on the Family's Jim Daly last week that "it's clear that something like same-sex marriage -- indeed, almost exactly what we would envision by that -- is going to become normalized, legalized, and recognized in the culture."

"It's time," Mohler added, "for Christians to start thinking about how we're going to deal with that."

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

364 Comments

Filter by:
2 tell the truth

Mr. Gibson,

Your article and the Pew poll are a bit behind the times. An August, 2010 CNN poll reported 52% responding "Yes" to the question, "Do you think gays and lesbians should have a constitutional right to get married and have their marriage recognized by law as valid?" vs. 46% against.

And, another August, 2010 AP poll also found 52% in favor vs 46% against in response to the question, "Should the Federal Government give liegal recognition to marriages between couples of the same sex, or not?"

And, even more recently (as in yesterday's) Washington Post/ABC News poll found a 53% majority supporting gay marriage vs. 44% against.

The support has ALREADY surpassed the opposition.

(Links readily availiable thru the google.)

There's yet another poll regarding repealing the DOMA (one "skewed right", no less! but one required to balance things since it waas condoucted on behalf of the Human Rights Campaign) that found " 51 percent of voters polled oppose DOMA while 34 percent favor it. (Link: http://www.hrc.org/DOMApoll2011/ )

Mr. Moehler (with whom I almost NEVER agree- on ANYTHING) is correct when he says, "it's clear that something like same-sex marriage -- indeed, almost exactly what we would envision by that -- is going to become normalized, legalized, and recognized in the culture."

When he says, "It's time for Christians to start thinking about how we're going to deal with that.", really, there's only one option if people really do claim the name of Christ, and that is to love one another.

This will, of necessity, mean the end of comparing loving, committed, adult, consenting relationships with "marryin' a dog", "child-molestation", incest, rape, ***********, etc. and all the other usual "suspect" false accusations that some who call themselves "Christians" are fond of hurling. This is not "love".

It will also mean the recognizing of the humanity of God's gay and lesbian children, and also the call for them to be treated equally before the law, thus fulfilling the other of Christ's commandments - to do to others what you would have done unto yourself.

March 19 2011 at 2:19 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
otter

i dont know where they do there polls but ive talked to hundreds here in my area and its the same, no to gay marriage.. its unnatural. civil unions, why not , but not to marriage. leave that to men and woman. if this passes then our great nation is doomed if it isnt already.....

March 08 2011 at 6:32 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to otter's comment
2 tell the truth

I assure you that it is NOT "unnnatural". Heterosexuality is only "natural" for heterosexuals. DUH! as the kids used to say.

I could give you 1,176 reasons "why not" to "civil" unions (those would be the Federal benefits that flow from marriage that are denied to legally married US citizens), and then I would add 31 more (those would be the States that changed their Constitutions so that they could deny equality before the law to their gay citizens, including FORBIDDING "civil" unions in the first place).

"if this passes"? "IF"??? Honey, CATCH UP!. It has ALREADY PASSED in five (actually seven) States, plus D.C. There tens of thousands of perfectly legal same-gender marriages in the US. They are being denied government recognition by the demonstrably UN-Constitutional DOMA, violating both the Equal Protections clause AND the Full Faith & Credit Clause.

DO BETTER!

March 19 2011 at 2:26 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Santa

Let them be parents as long as they impregnate naturally

March 08 2011 at 5:58 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Santa's comment
2 tell the truth

Since when is procreation a requirement of marriage? ANYONE'S marriage? Oh, and a hint: not all heterosexuals can "impregnate naturally" either. But we still allow THEM to marry. DON'T we?

March 19 2011 at 2:20 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
dbagman

There is no such thing as homophobia. That is like saying Hitler was afraid of the jews, or the Ku Klux Klan is afraid of black people. Now, Hitler and the Klan may have been "afraid" the jews and blacks would get equal rights, but that's called prejudice. "Homophobe" is a word we use to "hide" it. C'mon America! Come out of the closet!

March 07 2011 at 11:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to dbagman's comment
griffinnme

I did!!!! :)

March 08 2011 at 9:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
AZ Stang

...and so begins the downfall of our once- great country.

March 07 2011 at 4:25 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to AZ Stang's comment
2 tell the truth

Your "once great country" hasn't been very "great" since WWII. Now, please feel free to explain how treating all citizens equally before the law (i.e. living up to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights) begins a downfall.

March 19 2011 at 2:28 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Drego

With more than 50% of marriages ending in divorce within the first five years, With more than 40% of babies currently born out of wedlock and father's refusing to accept the legal, financial and moral responsibilities of fatherhood, With more than 60% of younger people (18 to 34) cohabitating without the financial and legal commitments of marriage, I find it hard to believe many so people are determined to deny two people of the same gender the rights to commit to the legal commitments of marriage. It is apparent the heterosexual community already have what they obviously do not want. Anyone concerned about the "family" should commit to the idea of outlawing divorce and forcing fathers to take responsibility for their off-springs rather than placing this financial burden on society. Allowing two people of the same-gender to commit their love and passion to one another thru "marriage" in no way hinders my 32 year marriage.

March 07 2011 at 2:04 AM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
cmdteachpe

I would like to know who gets polled. I never get asked and there are a lot of other people, I know, that don't get asked either. So where are all the numbers coming from? The institution of marriage is being destroyed by adultery, fornication, too many divorces and families are being torn apart. As the country goes down this road, we are losing what makes us strong; family units with a mother, father and children. Welfare system has destroyed the family unit because if you need assistance, can't be married. We are a stronger nation when we have a mother and father raising their children to be productive members of society. Gender matters in society. If you don't agree, you have a right to your opinion, just like I do. What you do in the privacy of your home is just that - private. Once government approves of gay marriages - the next thing will be trying to force religions to go against their belief and perform gay marriages. Wrong is wrong. Society is being destroyed by immorality, selfishness, not taking personal responsibility for your actions, indebtedness, greed, and the list can go on.

March 06 2011 at 8:25 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to cmdteachpe's comment
dkdk

You might want to review the Constitution. If the government approves gay marraige it doesn't change anything any religion in America is already doing. Separation of Church and State, remember? If your religion wants to keep preaching hatred and fear about it, that is also protected under the constitution. But I guarantee you, nothing about your day-to-day life has or will change because of someone else's marriage.

March 06 2011 at 8:35 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
2 tell the truth

"We are a stronger nation when we have a mother and father raising their children to be productive members of society."

Surveys indicate that children do just as well with two parents of the same gender, if not better.

"the next thing will be trying to force religions to go against their belief and perform gay marriages"

I'm sorry, but I cannot sit by idly and let you continue to promulgate lies. This is an outright falsehood. This has not happened in the 7+ years SSM has been legal in America, (nor in any of the other ten countries with SSM) nor will it in the future. It won't because of the Constitution's promise of freedom of religion to ALL. It will not happen until the Catholic church is 'forced' to marry divorced people, or until the Church of the Aryan Nation is 'forced' to marry inter-racial couples.

You have made another false assumption by implying that gay people are ipso facto immoral, selfish, don't take personal responsibility, greedy, etc. This "list" you made up can just as easliy be applied to you betterosexuals.

Making false statements (aka telling lies, bearing false witness) is a sin. It sez so in yer Bible. Go look it up. Lying does not help your (anti-gay, anti-equality) cause. In fact, if you have to lie to 'win' your 'battle', you've already lost your (moral) 'war'.

March 19 2011 at 2:37 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
dkdk

To Rimmerjax & Pianomanref; Maybe it's easy for you to just brush it off and call it "nonsense" or say most people don't care. But that's because you can't possibly know what it's like to be on this side of it. Way too many people have lived their entire lives in this country where people make laws against them saying they are not allowed to marry the person they love or to be a parent. Would you like it if people who had no experience living the way you have your whole life decided laws against you?

March 06 2011 at 8:03 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
rimmerjax

I think the huge majority of the USA does not care, they are to worried about important things like, food, shelter, paying the bills, buying gas and living their lives.

March 06 2011 at 6:39 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to rimmerjax's comment
dkdk

The thing is, this doesn't concern the 'huge majority'. So why should those that aren't gay or don't care about gay issues have any say in this? It's not for you to decide. Would you like it if I tried to get a law passed saying that you couldn't marry the person you loved or adopt a child?

March 06 2011 at 7:51 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to dkdk's comment
Hoppypilot

Haha. BUT it is for ME to decide. Those who aren't gay or who don't care have a say because we live in a democracy. Everyone has a 'right' to a particular view point ...even if that view point is silly.

March 07 2011 at 10:08 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down
2 tell the truth

Hoppy,

Putting OTHER PEOPLE'S civil and human rights to a popular vote is an obscenity, an affront to the Constitution and unworthy of America, Land of the FREE. Whatever happened to LIBERTY and JUSTICE for ALL? Whatever happened to the inalienable right to the pursuit of happiness/.

Oh, and btw, just an FYI, you do NOT "live in a democracy". If you live in the United States of America, you live in a Constitutional Republic. The Constitution is there to protect minorities from the tyranny of the 'majority' like you. Just ask the Lovings. Or, take a civics class.

March 19 2011 at 2:43 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down
pianomanref

The world is on fire and we are worried about this nonsense?

March 06 2011 at 6:15 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to pianomanref's comment
dkdk

Nonsense? Really? Have people around you been trying to and succeeding at making laws saying you can't marry the person you love or raise a child? Yeah, try living with that your whole life and then come back and tell us how it's all 'nonsense'.

March 06 2011 at 7:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dave and mary

piano: you see moral issues not as important as economic ones; when it fact, the economy is the shape it's in because of our moral decline.

March 06 2011 at 8:21 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to dave and mary's comment
dkdk

THANK you!

March 06 2011 at 9:14 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>