Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Mitch McConnell: Obama Not Serious About Entitlements Reform

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Sunday that "this is the perfect time to tackle entitlement reform" because both political parties now share power – and responsibility – in Washington, but he said he does not think President Obama is serious about doing so.

"This is the perfect time to tackle entitlement reform. ... We have divided government," McConnell said on CBS' "Face the Nation." "That is, one party doesn't control the entire government. That's the time to do big things. Remember when Reagan and Tip O'Neill fixed Social Security. Remember when Clinton and a Republican Congress did welfare reform. This is the time to do important and difficult stuff."

McConnell was referring to the compromise former President Ronald Reagan made during his first term with then-Speaker Thomas P. (Tip) O'Neill, a Democrat, to keep Social Security solvent by raising payroll taxes and reducing benefits. Former President Bill Clinton, who ran in 1992 on a promise to reform the welfare system, wasn't able to do it while Democrats controlled Congress, but ended up getting a bill to sign – although one that was not altogether to his liking – after Republicans captured Congress in the 1994 elections.

"We're prepared to do difficult things, but [Obama] must be a part of it because we're not looking at making an issue here," McConnell said. "We're looking at making a law. And that requires the signature of the president of the United States."

As calls for tackling the federal deficit have taken center stage, both Republicans and Democrats have said it will be necessary to get costs under control for huge entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. But so far, each side has consistently ducked making any proposals about how to proceed on the subject, which has often been referred to as the "third rail" of politics.

McConnell called the costs of those programs "unsustainable."

But asked if he thought Obama was serious about tackling the issue, McConnell said, "No, I don't."

"What I don't see now is any willingness to do anything that's difficult," McConnell said. "I've a number of conversations with people who count at the White House. And I think that, so far, I don't see the level of seriousness that we need."

White House Chief of Staff William Daley painted a different picture when he was asked on NBC's "Meet the Press" if the White House was playing the political game of "you first" with the Republicans.

"The president doesn't feel that way," Daley said. "The president has had conversations with Speaker Boehner, Leader Cantor, Congresswoman Pelosi, McConnell and Reid -- Senators McConnell and Reid. And he is not going to play the Washington games."

"We've had enough in the last two years," Daley added. "I think the American people are sick and tired of it. They're tired of the partisanship. And if anyone thinks that out of this last election the American people were voting for more partisanship, more saying no, I think they're going to have a rude awakening in the next election."

On the other major budget issue of the day – whether the two parties can avoid a government shutdown after the latest temporary financing measure expires – Daley said, "I'm very optimistic that there will not be a shutdown."

However, the usual fencing continued Sunday between both sides, with Democrats accusing Republicans of being penny-wise and pound-foolish in cutting too deeply into necessary programs, and Republicans accusing Democrats of wanting to spend money the government doesn't have.

Asked about the measure passed by the House to cut $61 billion from the current year's federal budget, Sen. John Kerry (D-.Mass.), said on CBS: "I don't believe what we have from the House is a serious economic plan. I think it's an ideological, extremist, reckless statement. ... I think it's a very dangerous plan."

That brought this retort later from McConnell: "When my friend John Kerry says cutting government spending is reckless, I'm wondering, what planet is he living on?"

Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, said he expected the House measure to be put to a vote in the Senate and predicted its defeat.

"My guess is it will not come close to passage," Durbin said on "Fox News Sunday." "It's an indication that we need to get very serious, act like adults, sit down and not lurch from one week or two weeks to two weeks in funding our government. We need to try to reach an agreement on a bipartisan basis. And I hope that after our vote in the Senate, that will happen."

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

483 Comments

Filter by:
inasctg56

The democrats and even some tea party members want cuts made in areas of waste and military - areas where republicans won't go. For example it was just announced today that Bank of America paid zero federal taxes and the other big banks paid only 11%. This country has shifted the tax burden onto families while they worked longer harder and for less and corporations and wall street walked away with record profits. There is little room for compromise when dems fight for families and workers and republicans fight for corporations.

March 08 2011 at 11:25 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
inasctg56

reply to sfamilyent: Manufacturing sector has had 19 months in gains and exports have seen double digit gains. For every 10% gain in exports equals a gain of 7% in jobs. President Obama and his administration have negotiated better trade agreements and are enforcing existing trade laws (that Bush didn't enforce). Legislation has passed for businesses to writeoff 100% of improvements made in this country as well as hiring incentives. This holds business more accountable for job creation instead of just throwing them the money and hoping it trickles down - which it never did.

March 08 2011 at 11:21 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
sfamilyent

The primary issue of the day is jobs. Balancing the budget will be less of an issue if employment increases. So, where are the actions to produce jobs?

March 07 2011 at 7:41 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
klovepr

"We’ve just found out startling information, and I am calling on President Obama, Majority Leader Harry Reid and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to apologize to the American people and explain why in the bill known as Obamacare they put in over $105 billion in appropriations.

“The funny thing is, they forgot to tell the members of the Senate that there was $105 billion in spending in that bill. They forgot to tell members of the House.

Here's an easy way to cut the budget...

“Since when do we pass a transformative piece of legislation like the government takeover of healthcare and just happen to drop in $105 billion in appropriations, the purpose of which will be to implement this massive new bill? No one knew. We have just found out in the last week or so.

“This is a stunning revelation. It’s shocking. We’ve been fighting to cut $100 billion out of the budget and then we find out that the Democrats led by President Obama have already spent $105 billion and didn’t bother to tell Congress.

Michelle Bachman (say what you will about the woman - but I seriously doubt she would make such an inflammatory claim without proof)

Read more on Newsmax.com: Bachmann Exclusive: Obama, Reid and Pelosi 'Deceitfully' Hid $105 Billion in Obamacare
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

March 07 2011 at 3:11 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
ginnyhuseby

Social Security and Medicare are not entitlement programs. These programs pay for themselves. If Social Security had been left in it's own trust, before Lendon Johnson made it part of the general funds, it would be self sufficient. I also had medicare cost taken out of my salary. My definition of entitlement is programs that do not contribute to their funding. So please do not keep refering Social Security and Medicare as entitlements. Medicade is an entitlement as it does not contribute, that is definitely a give away program states can not afford.

March 07 2011 at 1:23 PM Report abuse +11 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to ginnyhuseby's comment
klovepr

Agreed.

March 07 2011 at 3:12 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
asroyse

well said--sounds like you totally get it.The libs think social security is designed to use for all government giveaways

March 08 2011 at 10:01 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to asroyse's comment
Josh

What? Pay attention in history class; the libs invented Social Security and consider it to be one of the top victories in leftist politics.

Its the republicans in the legislative after Reagan that saw it as a piggy bank.

March 09 2011 at 3:48 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down
inasctg56

What the gop is serious about is cutting jobs and job creation at the federal and state levels. Cantor wants to bring back the 2004 tax rate of 5.25% for overseas profits and Michelle Bachmann wants to repeal the banking legislation - which is right back to their old failed policies. Why anyone could have been manipulated to vote them back in office is beyond me.

March 07 2011 at 12:34 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
tenderlies1

Mconnell say's Obama isn't serious, they come out and fight to give even more huge tax breaks that adds to the deficit and then they yell at Obma to cut entitlement, Social Security and medicare are not entitlements they were paid for and if the goverment ha been minding their own business adjustments could have been made long ago at a slow pace and would hav never hurt people as badly. If these programs had not been added in with the Federal budget to where the Politicians could get their hands on it it would be a lot better off as well. And if they think for one minute I will invest in anything the goverment has a finger in I will quit working at anything that shows on a tax form. And definately Wall Street is out totally . I do not trust the Republicans to do anything good for the people and for sure Mconnell won't . My major goal is to work from now till the next election time to remove him as well as Boehner , Next would be Issa and Eric Cantor.

March 07 2011 at 12:30 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
inasctg56

reply to msgusarmyret77: Your figures for the debt are wrong. Clinton went from a 399 billion debt left from Reagonomics and lowered it to $18 billion, which is what the gop started with under Bush and ended with over $11 trillion in debt - the largest amount financed from other countries in our history. But you are so right about the rest. One of the ways Clinton brought our debt down was taxing the upper 2% a little more, which the gop fights against when it would have been the smartest thing to do at this time.

March 07 2011 at 12:28 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to inasctg56's comment
msgusarmyret77

I got my figures from the history of the National Debt so I think they are correct.

March 07 2011 at 12:44 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to msgusarmyret77's comment
wolfsonnydiane

isnt the debt the money we are short on our current budget and the deficet the total amount we owe on our credit card wasnt our deficet when bush took over just a little over 5 trillion and we had a surplus left over from clintons last budget s of 245 billion dollars Bush then ran our budget deficet up by i.3 trillion dollars and our debt up by over 6 trillion While evan the 1.3 trillion was skewed by the fact the cost of the wars and medicare were left out of his budgets thefor not part of his budgets short falls

March 08 2011 at 12:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down
p47nandmosquito

wolfsonnydiane actually the deficit is what's on the current budget and the debt is the total owed.

March 10 2011 at 12:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down
tplapper

And how much pork has McConnell brought back to his state?

March 07 2011 at 11:54 AM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
msgusarmyret77

Where did the National Debt come from? Reagan $1.9 trillion. Bush I $1.6 trillion. Clinton $1.6 trillion. Bush II $4.9 trillion. Bush's tax cuts for the rich which didn't expire until Dec 2010 added another $1.2 trillion to Pres Obama's budget that he could do nothing about. So where were the Republicans when the National Debt was exploding. Their only solution now is to cut the help needed to the have-nots of the country. They will block any attempt to raise the income of the country by raising the taxes on the rich to where they were before Reagan. The top 1/2 of one percent of the rich own this country and the bottom 25% of the people are living on welfare because they have no jobs and starving.

March 07 2011 at 11:31 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>