Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Rival Budget Bills Fail in Senate, Shutdown Countdown Begins

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The Senate voted Thursday to defeat two rival plans to cut federal spending through the end of the year, reflecting deep divisions over the best course to tame the country's spiraling debt.

The impasse means that lawmakers will continue negotiations ahead of a March 18 deadline. That's when the current short-term spending measure expires and the government could shutdown without a new agreement.

The first bill, approved by House Republicans last month, was rejected in the Senate by a vote of 44 to 56. All 53 Democrats and three Republicans voted against it. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) said the cuts in the GOP bill did not go far enough.

Then the Democratic alternative failed 42 to 58. All 46 Republicans voted no, along with 11 Democrats and one independent.

The GOP bill would have sliced $61 billion from the current budget through cuts to programs dear to Democrats' hearts, like implementation of health care reform, Pell grants, early learning programs, nutrition for women and children, and funding for Planned Parenthood.

The Democratic measure would have trimmed $6.5 billion this year by eliminating earmarks and zeroing out funds for several highway projects and programs that President Obama has agreed to end.

The three-hour debate leading up to the votes became heated at times, with Republicans accusing Democrats of ignoring the debt problem, and Democrats warning that the GOP plan would harm women, children, homeless veterans, the sick, the poor and the elderly.

"If this were a plan to get us to a balanced budget, I would support it, but it's not," said Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.). "It's just a plan that compromises our national security without doing much else. When a real plan is presented, I'll vote for it. Until then, I'm voting no."

But Republican senators argued that no matter what had led up to this moment, the country is burning cash at a rate that will cripple the nation and its ability to prosper in the future.

"For goodness sakes, we've got to stop spending money we don't have on things we don't absolutely need," said Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), a longtime budget hawk.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) criticized GOP efforts to cut non-defense discretionary spending alone. He said reductions to all programs, as well as "revenue raisers," or tax hikes, must be discussed during the next round of budget negotiations.

"This is a Trojan horse spending proposal and we should not be fooled by it," he said. "These cuts will harm our ability to prepare for the future because they gut the very priorities we need to be investing in to help our economy grow -- education, energy investment, technology and infrastructure."

Other Democrats wondered why Republicans have become so concerned about the budget under President Obama, but made no attempt to deal with deficits that George W. Bush presided over as president.

"We borrowed the money for [the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan] -- one that went way beyond what it was ever supposed to be and the other we should not have been in in the first place," said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.). "We also cut taxes for oil companies and rich people and everyone else."

For their part, Republicans said the Democratic proposal did not go nearly far enough. Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) called the plan to cut $6.5 billion at a time when the deficit is growing by $4 billion per day "pathetic and entirely inadequate."

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) warned that current spending levels had put the United States on a path toward European-style socialism.

"Are we going to be a country with a constitutionally limited government that limits the burden of taxation on individuals and families and businesses, or are we going to become Europe?" Hatch asked.

Several senators voted against both proposals, criticizing both parties for failing to put a serious and fair budget proposal forward for senators to consider.

"In my view, neither is serious," said Sen. Ben Nelson (D. Neb.). "These bills are loaded down with tricks, treats, gimmicks, and games."

With the two votes completed, senators said they are ready to go back to the negotiating table, a process that began last week with a meeting presided over by Vice President Joe Biden, but complicated by his current trip overseas.

Funding for the government will expire at midnight on March 18 under a short-term measure called a continuing resolution. On Tuesday, House GOP whip Kevin McCarthy said Republicans have little hope that a seven-month budget agreement will be reached before then, so are prepared to negotiate another continuing resolution to keep the government operating while the talks continue.

With a lengthy negotiating process ahead, Coburn warned Wednesday that time is running out for Washington to solve the problem.

"We can no longer kick the can down the road without spilling the soup all over our kids. The time for action is now," he said.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

8 Comments

Filter by:
inasctg56

House majority leader Eric Cantor wants to return the 2004 legislation that taxes corporations only 5.25% on overseas profits. Michelle Bachmann wants to repeal the banking legislation that protects consumers. The republicans at the federal and state levels are cutting jobs and wages while handing it over to businesses and corporations in tax cuts. Many gop governors are doing away with ALL business taxes. Their theory of only little people pay taxes has choked families and they use services just as much if not more. This is why they are far apart on reaching budgets. When Clinton addressed the debt - he enacted the tax on the upper 2% while creating jobs and tax cuts for middle class and it worked. There is no demand in our economy when the gop chokes working families - which is what they continue to do.

March 13 2011 at 4:09 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Chris

"Democrats warning that the GOP plan would harm women, children, homeless veterans, the sick, the poor and the elderly." - the same thing was said about Welfare Reform and it didn't happen.

March 10 2011 at 11:17 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
sfamilyent

The Democratic proposal is an insult to the American people. We don't have the income / revenues to support the spending levels, and it appears that they are ignoring the growing sentiment that we don't want to continue borrowing money to fund the shortfall. Cut the spending and force more efficient use of the money that we have. And, but the way, the Republican proposal doesn't go far enough either.

March 10 2011 at 6:12 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
kruddie00

If we quit balling in Iraq and Afghanistan that alone would satisfy a big cut in out of control spending. This country have problems with spending money on everything except these two wars that will destroy the country good financial standings. It's time to really take a good look at what the future beholds for our descendants. I'm quite sure it won't be fossil fuel.

March 09 2011 at 11:41 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to kruddie00's comment
Nickolaus

Kruddie- Get the facts straight. Entitlement spending accounts for more than 50% of the federal budget. Defense spending is a mere 14%. You can cut defense all you want, but it wont solve much.

March 10 2011 at 11:19 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
tnickerson08

The 61 billion the Republicans want to cut is less than 10% of what the liberals spent on the stimulus; which wasn't anything more than a union pay-off. Next the democrats are going to claim that the 6.5 billion is meeting the Republicans halfway.

March 09 2011 at 9:29 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Margaret

Defense needs to be cut by HUGE amounts. First, get out of Iraq NOW and get out of Afghanistan by the end of the year = BILLIONS saved. Secondly, do we seriously still needs bases in England and Germany? Bring our troops home. From EVERYWHERE. And stop paying independent contractors BILLIONS of dollars. That is the biggest waste in government. Unless both sides are willing to cut the military budget, we won't get anywhere.

March 09 2011 at 5:38 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Margaret's comment
Nickolaus

Margaret - While I agree with you on some of your points, I think your knowledge of the facts is a bit skewed. Entitlement spending accounts for over 50% of the entire federal budget. Defense is a mere 14%. Until we get entitlements under control, the budget problem will not be solved. Defense spending is a much smaller piece of the pie.

March 10 2011 at 11:17 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>