AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
It was the president's sentiment that the Cambridge police "acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own house" that made headlines and launched debate on whether he should have said anything at all. Lost were his comments on racial profiling and a bill he worked on in the Illinois legislature.Dayton Ohio had test for the police department. Not enough minorities pasted. DOJ Holder made them re do the test. Dayton had and independent firm talk to police officers of all races and wrote a new test. They gave a new test with the same results. Now DOJ Holder want Dayton to lower the standard of who they will accept and fill quotas. Local naacp president disagreed now he says nothing after the national naacp agreed with HOLDER. This is racist when you are accepting a group for what they are not what they know or are qualified to do.
March 15 2011 at 7:07 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyI will never understand the woman who wrote this article or any of her cohorts and they will never understand me. It's sad.
March 14 2011 at 7:35 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyAs long as there are speakers and writers using racism as their soapbox there will be racism it's that simple, people like Louis Farrakhan and Jesse Jackson thrive on racism extorting millions from their own people to perpetuate their own importants and not caring about the cost. They want to hold up the great Dr. King as a martyr, and they're truly unfit to walk and his shadow. Dr. King wanted a equality across the land, todays black leaders want black domination, not equality , there will never be enough fairness to satisfy people like this.
March 14 2011 at 9:03 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyWhere is the mention of the black police officer that was present at the time of the arrest and backed the Sgt. 100% in his actions and the detaining of Prof. Ogletree? Why is race always assumed to be the motivating factor when a white police officer and a black (possible) offender are involved? Several years ago I watched a news interview of a South Florida Police officer who had shot nine black people in his 5-6 years as a Tactical officer. The interviewer asked how he could explain that all were black that he had shot and he responded, quite accurately, "...it's hard to shoot white people committing crimes in black neighborhoods." When an officer responds to a call and finds someone that may be breaking the law, the first thing the officer should do, regardless of the race of the encountered person, is to render that person harmless, then determine the situation.
March 14 2011 at 7:19 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyMy wife, two children, and I spent a long hour and a half on the Mall in Washington sitting in 90plus degree heat in an old, unairconditioned Jeep Wagoneer because I could not remember my Social Security number for a Park Police officer who had pulled me over for... a windshield someone had vandalized that I could not afford to have repaired. He was Black and in power, and we were not. Happens all the time. What's your point?
March 13 2011 at 3:24 PM Report abuse Permalink +9 rate up rate down ReplyThe police officer was just doing his job. Obama spoke before he knew all the facts. Professor Gates has an attitude problem and Bidin was there for the free beer. I think the whole charade was embarrassing and beneath a President.
March 13 2011 at 3:00 PM Report abuse Permalink +12 rate up rate down ReplyThis journalist and so many others, many of whom are liberal, are guilty of the same biases they think they are fighting against. A very large percentage of police, especially along the southwest border, are Hispanic. A very large percentage of police in our highest crime areas are black. Yet Obama and other liberals try to make the case that in the southwest, local and state police are too racist to enforce immigration laws without violating civil rights and that police randomly harass and arrest black Americans for being black. To smear an entire profession as noble as those who protect and serve at the very real risk of their lives is just wrong.
March 13 2011 at 12:26 PM Report abuse Permalink +11 rate up rate down Reply"But it says more about the broader issue that Gates is the one who has a lawyer -- me -- who has resources, who can get a positive result, and that's not the case for most people in America who are black or brown and poor."...............Do you really think it works any differently for the rest of us, Mary, who do not have the resources to fight back? Get real, please, time to drop the race issue.
March 13 2011 at 11:01 AM Report abuse Permalink +20 rate up rate down ReplyWow, the oversimplification of this article is breathtaking. It is just assumed that this was all a racially oriented incident and nothing about the police POV is even considered. The officer involved was very clear about police procedures underlying his actions. The fear was, this man who lived there could have been sent down by the two men who were reported as possibly having broken in, his family being threatened with mayhem if he did not send the police away. For this very rational reason he was asked to step outside, the stated reason being that out there he could more likely clarify exactkly what was going on.His objections to what was a routine police procedure contributed to what followed. Even if you don't fully buy this explanation, to boil this down to "prominent African Americans face racial prejudice every day" is just totally intellectually bankrupt. Shame on all who want to see the world in such simplistic terms.
March 13 2011 at 10:36 AM Report abuse Permalink +24 rate up rate down ReplyThese things you will find when you take the SAT to get in college. People are not accepted by scores but by quotas. When you are inposition to hire people you have to hire by quota. If you want a government contract you have to hire so many minorities to get a contract. So many government contracts have to be given to minorities not depending on price or experience. I have worked with many minorities that were great workers and deserved everything they got, but I have seen people promoted for what they are not what they know or do. Equality means you work or study hard you should get the benifits of your hard work no matter what race or sex you are.
March 13 2011 at 9:10 AM Report abuse Permalink +17 rate up rate down ReplySAT scores? LMAO! It was published a couple of months ago that 23.8% of hig school gradutes CANOT pass the test to join the Army. You know, tough questions like can you tie shoelaces or do you use velcro fasteners.
March 13 2011 at 2:17 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
16 Comments