Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

New Poll Shows Public Split Over U.S. Enforcing a Libya 'No-Fly' Zone

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
In contrast to an earlier CNN poll showing a majority of Americans supporting establishment of a no-fly zone over Libya, another survey released Tuesday finds the public almost evenly split on whether the U.S. should taker such action.

A Pew Research Center poll, conducted March 10-13, shows that a slim majority (51 percent) favor increasing sanctions on Libya, but when it comes to enforcing a no-fly zone, 45 percent are opposed while 44 percent favor doing so, with 11 percent undecided.

The CNN poll said Americans favored a no-fly zone by a 56 percent to 40 percent margin, with 4 percent undecided.

The results of the Pew poll conflicted with the CNN poll on another point: whether the U.S. should send arms to the Libyan rebels. In the Pew poll, Americans opposed doing so by a 69 percent to 23 percent margin, with 8 percent undecided. The CNN poll said 53 percent of Americans supported send arms and supplies to the opposition while 43 percent opposed doing so, with 4 percent undecided.

In both polls, large majorities of Americans opposed bombing of Libyan air bases by the U.S. or the use of ground troops.

The Pew poll also compared public desire (or lack of it) for intervention in Libya to other crises involving wars, and widespread death and destruction. Sixty-three percent said the U.S. does not have a responsibility to act in Libya while only 27 percent support intervention, with 10 percent undecided. That contrasts with the ethnic genocide in Darfur where Americans favored action by a 51 percent to 36 percent margin, with 3 percent undecided.

Americans were split on intervention in the fighting in Kosovo in 1999, with 47 percent favoring it and 46 percent opposed, with 7 percent undecided. And, by a 64 percent to 30 percent margin, with 6 percent undecided, they said the U.S. did not have a responsibility to intervene in the conflict between Serbs and Bosnians in 1995.

The biggest reason for the reluctance to commit to a U.S. role in Libya among was concern over how much American forces are already committed to conflicts around the world. Fifty-one percent of those surveyed held this view. Nineteen percent said that the Libyan opposition might turn out to be no better than the Gadhafi regime, 13 percent did not consider Libya of vital interest to the U.S., 5 percent said it was because they do not support the use of force and 12 percent cited other reasons or were undecided.

The biggest reason cited by those who favored U.S. involvement was that it was important to show that America backs democracy.

The belief that the U.S. did not have a responsibility to act in Libya cut across party lines, with majorities of Republicans, Democrats and independents sharing that view.

Follow Poll Watch on Twitter

Visit the Poll Watch Home Page and see all the latest polls in one place

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

7 Comments

Filter by:
jimgenejeb

America is the leader of the world and as such we must stop stalling and push post haste for a Libyan no-fly zone to protect those who are willing to die for the same freedoms we're willing to die for. John McCain has been pushing for a no-fly zone from the beginning and when it comes to things military, I respect Senator McCain's take on the increasingly deteriorating situation where the rebels, many only teenagers who barely know how to use a gun, are willing to sacrifice their lives to be free. If we don't help these people NOW, the consequences of our inaction will come back to haunt us. The world is watching to see what we will do. President Obama has asked Gadhafi to step down. Since Gadhafi and his sons have ignored Obama, it is especially imperative that America take action. Libyan rebels and France and Britain are NOT asking us to go in on the ground; they are asking us to protect the Libyan Freedom Fighters from three airports--that's right, THREE SMALL AIRPORTS--where enacting a no-fly zone will ensure that a world-acknowledged murderous madman cannot use them as striking pads to kill his own people. Because we are not talking about a significant investment of our time or troops, it is even more imperative in this increasingly small world in which we live that we take immediate action to aid these brave Libyan rebels who refuse to turn and run. Massacres no longer occur out of sight. If we don't act now, we and the rest of the world will see video evidence documenting our inaction as cold-blooded pragmatic timidity. The thought that we Americans, knowing the slaughter was easily preventable, might have to live with horrific images of a generation of freedom-loving young Libyans' lifeless bodies scattered over the scorched earth of Gadhafi's air attacks, will torment our American soul, and well it should.

March 16 2011 at 5:55 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
tistolaugh

I am not split over it at all. America is broke there are no jobs people are losing there homes and struggling to feed their families. The last thing we can do right now is get involved in another optional foreign war. How about putting America first for once?

March 16 2011 at 12:41 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to tistolaugh's comment
Josh

Guarantee people like you 5 yrs from now will be decrying this administration saying "why didn't we go in when we had the chance!" when the place is a hotbed for terrorism.

O, because going into Iraq was putting "america first' right? Yeah; maybe our gas tanks if anything.

March 16 2011 at 11:50 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
p47nandmosquito

While I can understand the reasons for hesitation, I do think we should impose a no-fly zone, without getting involved on the ground, and certainly without handing out weapons to anyone who happens to ask for them. Of course, enforcing a no-fly zone would be a challenge, because Gadhafi's forces surely have access to SAMs which would present a great danger to our aircraft. Thus to enforce it would almost certainly require destroying the SAM sites, which is harder for the average Joe to agree with. Probably the only way to do it would be to maintain a minimum of 2000 or more feet above the ground for all aircraft (to minimize the threat of MANPADS systems, and to have heavy Wild Weasel back up to take out any SAM sites that opened fire. It would of course be better if we could destroy the SAMs first, but that is unlikely to happen.

March 15 2011 at 3:17 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
John Vilvens

Nice article on polls. Polls are only as good as the way the questions are asked and who you ask. What america should do in Libya is a question that will be decided by people with more facts then I have. But america has to lead and either get on with the no fly zone or stay out. Not making decisions while people are dying is not helping. Make a decision and stand by it.

March 15 2011 at 7:16 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
dc walker

Diplomats, congressmen and the military generals have been warning this country to stay out of mid east politics since the 50s. All remarks were to stay out and let the dust settle. And here we are ready to send our best men and women to another hole in the world, won't we ever learn??? No fly means the US. What other country will use military might to stop them? When are we going to say enough waste over these two bit countries. We are $14 trillion in debt. We lost 58,000 in Vietnam, over six thousand in Iraq and Afghanistan. Let the Libyans take care of Libya.

March 14 2011 at 7:38 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
Richard McCabe

It depends on which poll you pick. The last one I read, not hours ago, had 75% in favor of no-fly. That was a scientific poll. In any case I think the US needs to stand aside and let others with better leadership handle the no fly zine.

March 14 2011 at 7:13 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>