Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Support for Construction of Nuclear Plants in the U.S. Drops Following Japan Crisis

4 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The nuclear crisis in Japan has had its impact on U.S. public opinion about construction of nuclear power plants here, with 47 percent now in opposition to building more plants compared to 44 percent who favor doing so, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll conducted March 15. Nine percent were undecided.

Prior to the Japan disaster, a large majority of Americans supported the construction of nuclear power plants, peaking at 62 percent last year, and slipping only slightly to 57 percent in Gallup's last pre-crisis survey in early March.

Seventy percent of those surveyed said they now were a lot or a little more concerned about the prospects of a nuclear disaster in the U.S., with 39 percent saying they were "a lot more concerned." Twenty-seven percent said they were not more concerned.

Despite the noticeable drop in support for construction of nuclear plants in the latest poll, Gallup said, "It is not clear, however, what long-term impact the Japanese incident will have on Americans' support for nuclear power, which has been consistently above a majority and higher than it was a decade ago."

Follow Poll Watch on Twitter

Visit the Poll Watch Home Page and see all the latest polls in one place
Filed Under: Polls, Energy, Poll Watch
Outbrain - The Most Trusted Content Discovery Platform

Get Your Content Discovered.

Promote your content on premium websites

Learn More ›

Outbrain Amplify:
Get your content discovered

Your content will be promoted on the web's largest and most respected media properties, including, Slate and ESPN. We make sure it's seen precisely when people will find it most interesting.

Learn More

Outbrain Engage: The solution for a modern publisher

Outbrain Engage is a full stack software solution that empowers an entire media organization to more effectively manage its online content and programming experience.

Learn More

The world's largest content discovery platform

We bring together premium publishers and marketers of all sizes (including many of the world's leading brands) into the world's largest and most vibrant content marketplace. Learn more about Outbrain ›

561 Million

The global audience reached by Outbrain each month*

190 Billion

The total recommendations we serve consumers monthly


Of the world’s leading brands use Outbrain

* Audience reach according to comScore, September 2014. Leading brands via Ad Age DataCenter / Kantar Media, 2014.

Andy Blau
We selected Outbrain not only because the revenues were higher than others, but because its engine drives better recommendations than others.
Andy Blau
Senior Vice President, Group General Manager
Time Inc.
Dan Horowitz
It's less about buying traffic than it is about reaching the right people with relevant headlines to get them to your content.
Dan Horowitz
EVP and Senior Partner
Fleishman-Hillard Digital
Katrina Craigwell
Our goal is always to deliver content that adds value to the conversations being held by the end user. Outbrain allows us to do just that.
Katrina Craigwell
Global Manager of Digital Marketing
Bailey Foote
The fact that we’re able to drive these kinds of transactions with consumers at scale and with increasing efficiency has made Outbrain paramount to our marketing strategy.
Bailey Foote
E-commerce Manager
The Line
Neal Moore
You cannot leave it to chance that someone will find and engage with your content. Outbrain can put your content in the midst of the world’s most prestigious publications.
Neal Moore
Zach Zavos
Having links to our content appearing directly on premium publisher sites helped us establish our brand.
Zach Zavos
Conversant Media
Mike Brito
Outbrain is one of those [critical] components helping us deliver the right messages to the right contingent at massive scale and in real time to counter a crisis.
Mike Brito
Group Director

A global footprint of service

We operate offices in 11 global territories and we partner with publishers and marketers in over 55 countries, including the U.S., UK, France, Brazil, India and Japan. Come join us ›

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:

Wow, as i read these comments, how foolish to say that Nukes are safe. Do we not have any feeling for human life. All the benefits of nuclear power don't outweigh the disaster that can happen if there is a melt down. Mind you whether its a earthquake or some human error at a plant. Its flat out disaster. How can we feel safe when we learn that these plant operators lie on their inspection reports. We learn that in Cali an earthquake response plan is not required. Are you people mad for even goin for this bull crap?

March 21 2011 at 9:19 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

On a serious note: The nuclear plants in Japan did indeed shut down as expected with the 9.0 earthquake. The problem was that the tsunami took out all the back-up generators which would have kept the cooling pumps running. Now, if the plants had not shut down, they would have continued to generate their own power, running the pumps. But if they had not shut down, we would be hearing people scream about that. When Apollo 13 had its terrible time in space, it was said that NASA learned more about space travel from what went wrong than from all of the flights that went right. Point- every reactor from now on will be better and safer than ever because of this incident.

March 17 2011 at 10:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

I lived the better part of thirty years within the 10 mile "strike zone" of a SAC airforce base where in every phone book there was the "nuclear incident evacuation" map. I guess I have just become accustomed to accepting the basic safety of nukes, for weapons or power. I guess though if people are going to get their panties in a bunch, we could always replace our nuclear plants with coal-fired plants. Then the neighbors would only have to wash the coal dust off their cars every morning. Nothing invisible or mysterious about coal pollution. LOL

March 17 2011 at 10:18 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply

WHAAAAAAAAAAA We have become a nation of ignorant cowards. We do not even have the final results as to what will happen in Japan with the Nuclear plants and opportunists for the apparant cave man dwellers assosciation are crying, 'the sky is falling!" We are regulatied to extinction. FEAR seems to be the product under promotion. And ingorance responds. Shame on us all.

March 17 2011 at 3:00 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

I never approved of these power plants in the beginning. Their are a lot of other alternatives . Not 2 miles from my home we have a generation station that runs on coal and I have never had a problem with that. The coal also supports a large industry in this country. I only live about 100 miles from three mile island. and the Salem power plant in New Jersey is only 40 miles from me. These plants could at any time pose a problem.

March 17 2011 at 1:41 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Thomas Mc

They keep assuring us a meltdown could never happen here.

They were saying the same thing in Japan just a week ago!

March 17 2011 at 1:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Thomas Mc's comment

Is there a melt-down? I hadn't heard that it had been confirmed. I am sure that a week ago no one would have said that Japan would suffer a 9.0 quake with an epicenter basically right offshore from the reactors. and within minutes have an enormous tsunami in the same area. There are hundreds of reactors worldwide and this is only the third incident of any note in the 40 years we have had them running. No sense going loony over the whole thing.

March 17 2011 at 10:30 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>